Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lmao look at the kind of stuff they are deleting

https://www.undelete.pullpush.io/r/science/comments/uqgn6x/new_study_links_support_for_brett_kavanaugh_to

Basically anyone who criticizes social sciences generally, points out the obvious political agenda, agrees that the study is kinda weak (even the most mild critiques).

People love to claim that only racists and “bad faith” people are getting moderated out of discussions. Yet 99% of these could only be justified with some ideological position. Even then it has to be an extremely sensitive person at that.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Can't be helped when they have over 1500 jannies, can you imagine?! :marseyjanny::marseyjanny::marseyjanny::marseyjanny::marseyjanny::marseyjanny::marseyjanny:

![](/images/1652701886063127.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah and 1490 of them never touched the mop. It's just 10 users enforcing their world view there lol. I saw one of mods on some sub once boasting how he is keeping stuff like this to let evil Trumpets know that they're low iq poop brains or whatever

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah and 1490 of them never touched the mop.

i can't even load the moderator list on old reddit lmao: https://old.reddit.com/r/science/about/moderators

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm a mod on /r/science on some account or another. Never jannied a single thing.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseynerd:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's genetic, unfortunately.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Holy shit

And they all have PhDs so you know they don’t have a job or anything else productive to do

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

And they all have PhDs so you know they don’t have a job or anything else productive to do

I feel attacked.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

grad students and phds moderating reddit confirms so many priors

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

i should attempt to post astrology findings on that sub its as accurate and rigorous as the social sciences so it should be ok

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"In three studies (N = 886), we hypothesized and found"

seems like a bit of an issue

When the jannies remove criticism like that, we know they're being ideological c*nts.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.