https://old.reddit.com/r/science/comments/uqgn6x/new_study_links_support_for_brett_kavanaugh_to?sort=controversial
- 55
- 100
Top Poster of the Day:
J
Current Registered Users: 25,718
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS SITE GUIDE DIRECTORY Emojis & Art | Info Megathreads HOLES PING GROUPSCURRENT EVENTS:
Find Rightoid Drama
500 mbux per post, no limitInvite Internet Celebs HERE!
100k mbux award possible | Four new badges availableDrama: any incident, scene, gaffe, rumor, opinion, or disagreement that is blown entirely out of proportion.
Do your part to keep our community healthy by blowing everything out of proportion and making literally everything as dramatic as possible.
Rules:
- Asking to see who saved comments/posts=1 day ban
- You must be 18 or older to view this site.
- NO RIGHTWING AGENDAPOSTING.
- Discord users will be banned on sight.
- Don't post anything illegal.
- No sexualizing minors, even as a joke. This includes cartoons.
- No doxxing.
- Using alts to game dramacoin will get you banned.
- Supporting free speech is an immediate ban.
- Absolutely NO anti-CCP sentiment.
- Absolutely NO homophobia, transphobia or furphobia.
- Absolutely NO misgendering.
- Absolutely NO antisemitism.
- Absolutely NO vaccine misinformation.
- You are encouraged to post drama you are involved in.
- You are encouraged to brigade in bad faith.
- You are encouraged to gaslight, to gatekeep, above all else, to girlboss.
- Participation implies enthusiastic consent to being mod abused by unstable alcoholic bullies.
Related subreddits:
𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐩 𝐰𝐨𝐳 𝐞𝐫𝐞
Live commit: fb77148
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Lmao look at the kind of stuff they are deleting
https://www.undelete.pullpush.io/r/science/comments/uqgn6x/new_study_links_support_for_brett_kavanaugh_to
Basically anyone who criticizes social sciences generally, points out the obvious political agenda, agrees that the study is kinda weak (even the most mild critiques).
People love to claim that only racists and “bad faith” people are getting moderated out of discussions. Yet 99% of these could only be justified with some ideological position. Even then it has to be an extremely sensitive person at that.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Can't be helped when they have over 1500 jannies, can you imagine?!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah and 1490 of them never touched the mop. It's just 10 users enforcing their world view there lol. I saw one of mods on some sub once boasting how he is keeping stuff like this to let evil Trumpets know that they're low iq poop brains or whatever
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
i can't even load the moderator list on old reddit lmao: https://old.reddit.com/r/science/about/moderators
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm a mod on /r/science on some account or another. Never jannied a single thing.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's genetic, unfortunately.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Holy shit
And they all have PhDs so you know they don’t have a job or anything else productive to do
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I feel attacked.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
grad students and phds moderating reddit confirms so many priors
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
i should attempt to post astrology findings on that sub its as accurate and rigorous as the social sciences so it should be ok
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
When the jannies remove criticism like that, we know they're being ideological c*nts.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context