Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'd rarher die than read french

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Here, translated:

Emmanuel Macron to Vladimir Putin, four days before the war: "I don't know where your lawyer learned the law"

A conversation between Emmanuel Macron and Vladimir Poutine was unveiled in a documentary. On this occasion, the French president proposes a meeting in Geneva with Joe Biden. It will never take place. The verbatim of a firm dialogue

Initiate. French President Emmanuel Macron has tried to maintain dialogue with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, without having the slightest illusion and without any snippets of discussion filtering through. A documentary, which will be broadcast on Thursday June 30 on the French channel France 2, lifts part of the veil on these telephone conversations.

The verbatim of one of the last talks between Emmanuel Macron and Vladimir Putin before the war in Ukraine, four days before the start of the invasion, has been revealed. The French president has not yet seen this documentary on the backstage of the Elysée and the negotiations carried out with broken sticks, between familiarity, annoyance and incongruities. In this exchange, the Head of State offers the Russian President a meeting “in the very next few days” in Geneva with Joe Biden. It will never take place.

The verbatim

Emmanuel Macron:

Since our last conversation, tensions have continued to grow and you know my commitment and my determination to continue the dialogue. I would like you to give me your reading of the situation first and perhaps quite directly as we both tell me what your intentions are. And then afterwards, I wanted to try to see if there were still useful actions to be taken and to make some suggestions to you.

Vladimir Poutine:

What could I say? You see yourself what is happening. You and Chancellor Scholz told me that Zelensky was ready to make a move, that he had prepared a bill to implement the Minsk Accords. […] In fact, our dear colleague, Mr. Zelensky, does nothing. He is lying to you. […] I don't know if you heard his statement yesterday where he said that Ukraine must have access to atomic weapons.

(Diplomatic adviser Emmanuel Bonne: "But no, anything.")

I also heard your comments during the press conference in kyiv on February 8th. You said that the Minsk Accords must be revised, I quote, “so that they are applicable”.

(Macron's advisers: “No, he didn't say that”, “I'll tell him not to go into a detailed discussion with him.”)

Emmanuel Macron:

Vladimir, first of all, I never said that the Minsk Accords had to be revised. I never said it, neither in Berlin, nor in kyiv, nor in Paris. I said that they had to be applied, that things had to be respected, and I don't have the same reading as you of the last days.

Vladimir Poutine:

Listen Emmanuel, I don't understand your problem with the separatists. They at least did everything necessary, at our insistence, to open a constructive dialogue with the Ukrainian authorities.

Emmanuel Macron:

Regarding what you said, Vladimir, several remarks: first thing, the Minsk Agreements are a dialogue with you, you are absolutely right. In this context, it is not expected that the basis of the discussion will be a text submitted by the separatists. And so, when your negotiator tries to force the Ukrainians to discuss on the basis of the separatists' roadmaps, he is not respecting the Minsk Accords. It is not separatists who are going to make proposals on Ukrainian laws!

Vladimir Poutine:

Of course, we have a completely different reading of the situation. During our last interview, I reminded you of and even read articles 9, 11 and 12 of the Minsk Accords.

Emmanuel Macron:

I have them in front of me! It is well written that the government of Ukraine – paragraph 9, etc. – proposes, and that it is in consultation and in agreement with the representatives of certain districts of the regions of Donetsk and Lugansk, within the framework of the tripartite contact group. This is exactly what we propose to do. So I don't know where your lawyer learned the law (a counselor smiles) . Me, I just look at the texts and I try to apply them! And I don't know what jurist will be able to tell you that in a sovereign country, the texts of laws are proposed by separatist groups and not by the democratically elected authorities.

Vladimir Poutine:

(Firm and annoyed tone) This is not a democratically elected government. They came to power in a coup, there were people burned alive, it was a bloodbath and Zelensky is one of those responsible.

Listen to me carefully: the principle of dialogue is to take into account the interests of the other party. The proposals exist, the separatists, as you call them, transmitted them to the Ukrainians but they received no response. Where is the dialogue?

Emmanuel Macron:

But because, as I just told you, we don't give a darn about the separatists' proposals. What we are asking them is to react to the texts of the Ukrainians and things have to be done in this way because it is the law! What you have just said casts doubt, somewhere, on your own will to respect the Minsk Accords, if you judge that you are dealing with illegitimate and terrorist authorities.

Vladimir Poutine:

(Still very annoyed) Listen to me carefully. You hear me? I tell you again, the separatists, as you call them, reacted to the proposals of the Ukrainian authorities. They answered but these same authorities did not follow up.

Emmanuel Macron:

So ok: on the basis of their response to the texts of the Ukrainians, what I propose to you is that we demand from all the parties a meeting within the framework of the contact group in order to continue moving forward. Tomorrow, we can ask for this work to be done and demand that all stakeholders do not have an empty chair policy. However, the last two days, the separatists did not want to lend themselves to this discussion. Me, I will immediately demand that of Zelensky. Do we agree on that? If we agree, I launch it and I demand a meeting tomorrow.

Vladimir Poutine:

So to be in agreement, as soon as we hang up, I will study these proposals. But from the beginning, it was necessary to put pressure on the Ukrainians, but no one wanted to do it.

Emmanuel Macron:

But yes, I do my best to push them, you know it well.

Vladimir Poutine:

I know but unfortunately it is not effective.

Emmanuel Macron:

I need you to help me a little (mischievous) . The situation on the contact line is very tense. I really called Zelensky yesterday to calm down. I will tell him again, calm everyone down, calm down in social networks, calm down the Armed Forces of Ukraine. But what I also see is that you can really call to calm down your pre-positioned armed forces. There was a lot of shelling yesterday. If we want to give dialogue a chance, we have to calm things down in the region. How do you see the evolution of military exercises?

Vladimir Poutine:

Exercises are proceeding according to plan.

Emmanuel Macron:

So they end tonight, right?

Vladimir Poutine:

Yes, probably tonight, and we will definitely leave a military presence on the border until the situation in Donbass calms down. The discussion will be taken in consultation with the Ministries of Defense and Foreign Affairs.

Emmanuel Macron:

OK. Vladimir, I tell you very sincerely, for me, putting the discussions back in the right framework and avoiding tensions is an absolute prerequisite. And me, what matters to me – and I really ask you this – is that we have the situation under control. That is the first pillar. And I'm counting on you a lot. Do not give in to provocations of any kind in the hours and days to come.

I wanted to make two very concrete proposals to you. The first, organize a meeting in the next few days in Geneva between you and President Biden. I spoke to him Friday evening, I asked him if I could make you this proposal. He told me to tell you he was ready for it. President Biden also reflected on ways to credibly de-escalate the situation, take your demands into account and very clearly address the issue of NATO and Ukraine. Tell me the date that suits you.

Vladimir Poutine:

Thank you very much Emanuel. It is always a great pleasure and a great honor to speak with your European counterparts as well as with the United States. And I always have a lot of fun talking to you because we are in a relationship of trust. So, Emmanuel, I suggest you reverse things. First of all, you have to prepare this meeting beforehand. It is only afterwards that we will be able to talk because if we come like that, to talk about everything and nothing, we will still be blamed for it.

Emmanuel Macron:

But can we say to ourselves today, at the end of these discussions, that we agree on the principle? I would like a clear answer from you on this. I understand your reluctance on a date, but are you ready to go ahead and say today “I would like a two-person meeting with the Americans, then extended to the Europeans” or not? (counsellor: “Here.”)

Vladimir Poutine:

This is a proposal that deserves to be taken into account and if you want us to be well aligned on how to formulate it, I suggest that you ask our advisers to call each other to agree [… ] but know that in principle, I agree.

Emmanuel Macron:

Very well, you confirm to me that you agree on the principle. I suggest that our teams […] try to complete a joint text, a sort of press release at the end of this call.

Vladimir Poutine:

To be honest with you, I wanted to go play ice hockey because here I'm talking to you from the gym before starting physical exercises. I'll call my advisors first.

Emmanuel Macron:

Anyway, thank you Vladimir. We stay in touch in real time. As soon as there is something, you call me.

Vladimir Poutine:

Thank you Mr. President (in French) .

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

To be honest with you, I wanted to go play ice hockey because here I'm talking to you from the gym before starting physical exercises.

lmao what is this weird flex

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

As credible as hearing those words from Hillary "Fitness Mommy" Clinton.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

All them words won't bring your pa back.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Vladimir Poutine

Authoritarianism has never sounded so tasty

:#marseyflagcanada::#marseyfrylock:

Seriously though, it's really an enlightening read. (If you speak French.) It's always interesting to see when somebody who subscribes to mistake theory chats with somebody who subscribes to conflict theory - the fundamental differences in their worldviews are starkly apparent.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Authoritarianism is the worst possible way to run a society and your comment is an embarrassing example of how out of touch you are with reality. It's telling that you would find a book that promotes such an oppressive, regressive ideology "enlightening" - it just goes to show how little you actually know.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I fricking love this thing

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If you love it so much, why don't you marry it?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What book are you talking about? Did you even read the linked article? You're really terrible at making yourself sound intellectual, BTW.

I am a proud supporter of democratic authoritarianism. FDR was an inspiring visionary and the reason our oligarch elites have worked so hard to prevent more populist politicians like him from ascending is because they are terrified of anybody who can challenge their power.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You clearly didn't read the linked article OR my comment. I am not trying to make myself sound intellectual, I am trying to engage in an intelligent conversation. Your comment betrays a shocking lack of understanding of both the linked article and my comment. I am not a supporter of democratic authoritarianism, I am a supporter of democracy. FDR was a visionary and the reason our oligarch elites have worked so hard to prevent more populist politicians like him from ascending is because they are terrified of anybody who can challenge their power.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

FDR was an inspiring visionary and the reason our oligarch elites have worked so hard to prevent more populist politicians like him from ascending is because they are terrified of anybody who can challenge their power.

>FDR was a visionary and the reason our oligarch elites have worked so hard to prevent more populist politicians like him from ascending is because they are terrified of anybody who can challenge their power.

This is so weird. It's like you're trying to be me, but you're not as smart so the best you can do is a cheap knock-off version.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You're right, I'm not as smart as you. But at least I'm not a stuck-up jerk like you.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Interesting read, but it makes the French sound semi-sane and that Russia and them have some sort of homosexual relationship, which I highly doubt.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

According to Google, wet means "covered or saturated with water or another liquid." Since water molecules touch each other naturally as they move, and because there are always (99.999999%) more than a few molecules, they naturally shift and cover each other as they move.

In other words, water is wet. Checkmate mf

Snapshots:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.