.webp?x=8 "Top Hat (double rainbow) - Double the rainbow double the pride")
https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1556775245981356034
Better pic with the full statement:
](/images/16600011791336315.webp)
](/images/16600011972292957.webp)
Sigma male grindset, asking for donations after an FBI raid lmao. Never change Daddy
The seethe has started on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1556778305692606464
A sample:
](/images/1660000302635926.webp)
](/images/16600003638872714.webp)
](/images/1660000476675108.webp)
MarALago is number 2 1 on trending
](/images/16600024432443368.webp)
Charlie Kirk is furious but I can't take him seriously with that tiny little face
Sneed from Charlie's feed:
](/images/16600008612171648.webp)
@soiboi found this great seethe thread on patriots.lose
Lmao
](/images/1660002761645336.webp)
Get your Dark Brandon memes ready because they're going to piss off a lot of wingcucks
DEFUND THE FBI!
Sounds like antifa shit, if you ask me
Definitely not coping man Jack Posobiec is imagining he can hear Biden's cheers. The whole thread is full of r-slurs threatening Civil War if their favorite politician gets arrested. Frick the police, amiright?
Marge is now posting Anonymous memes and upside down flags. she's having a bad day
](/images/16674454055116708.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Something may actually happen this time within two weeks? Also
Makes it sound like the impeachments themselves were the hoaxes and they didn't happen.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It was all a bit! We frickin' got you Donald the camera's over there!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
He was acquitted from all charges. So they were hoax charges.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Cosby was acquitted, so I guess the charges were hoaxes.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
No, Bill Cosby may be a celebrity but he's still black
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The glove didn't fit!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
He wasn't acquitted lol. He got his conviction overturned.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You can get acquitted when you have been convicted. But that is only if a mistrial is declared.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If only politicians were in charge of the judicial branch. Only then could Justice rein across the lands.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
This is totally the beginning of the end for Drumpf
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Senate just decided if the charges were valid
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
No . The Senate conducted a trial and came to conclusion it was false.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They can't convict. It's not a criminal trial but quasi-trial. There is no conviction in criminal law sense but simply determination of validity of the impeachment charges . House sets the charges and senate determines if they are valid.
Also there is no jury nullification because there is no jury.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You're telling me that you think senators voted on their evaluation of the merits rather than to affirm/nullify based on their desired outcome?
It's obvious that Republicans voted to nullify, just as Democrats have in the past. It was a 99% party-line vote.
"Jury nullification" is simply the sense that "I'm voting on charges, and nobody can do anything about how I vote. So, I can nuke charges that are valid just because I want that outcome."
You'd have to be a rube to not understand how that concept is applicable to a "jury" of senators.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There is still no jury. All the Senate needs to do is try the charges with a vote. So senate pretty much says is if impeachment was guilty or not and that is final. It is like that because House can allege what ever it wants.
Because House sets the allegations while Senate pretty much confirms allegations be true or false.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes, I understand the process. I'm saying the same theory of jury nullification applies: if the people voting on the charges don't want them to stick, no merit to the accusations can force another outcome.
The Republicans had enough votes to nullify the impeachment charges against Trump, and they did. This tells us little to nothing about the merits of the charges, just as if a jury decided to nullify.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Youโd seriously canโt be looking at the hotbed of corruption Ukraine is and always has been and think โWow, there should have not been an investigation of thisโ (especially when Congress feels free to investigate everything else under the sun). Btw, there was no withholding of money from Ukraine
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context