https://twitter.com/Lee_H_E/status/1557562861102186497
Xi Xinpeng watching this, knowing thereโs absolutely no way his army of 5โ4โ 90lb soldiers can fight their way through entire cities of this and still enter Appalachia with any momentum https://t.co/tc8Fbia2Ua
— Lee E (@Lee_H_E) August 11, 2022
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Lol this r-slur actually thinks any of these groups (except the actual military) could stand against a foreign military. Even the chinks could handle a few gangbangers and gunnuts.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
afghanistan but orders of magnitude worse?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Is that even possible?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Like 1% of Afghans had outdated hand-me-down Soviet equipment, do you know how many burgers have modern guns? I'm not convinced all the official militaries on the planet combined (including America's) could firmly hold America if even 10% of the population was fighting back, shitty informal guerillas are already proven to be monstrously effective even against modern heavy equipment
Assuming it doesn't balkanize and everyone starts shooting each other, at least
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Burgers live concentrated in cities and most would die without access to 24/7 running water, electricity etc. Plus I think even Afg could have been won if burgers went scorched earth enough. They fight with medieval ethics, act like Timur and they'll fall in line.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
afghanies also had religious cause and fanatical devotion to their holy book. burgers only care about gasoline and macdonalds availability
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Most afghans hate the taliban, it really wasn't that many people fighting back I imagine there's a higher proportion of rightoids begging for an excuse to shoot, than there were people resisting the US in afghanistan
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
this is top cope. "not my president" secularist style
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
???? did you not see how many afghans were horrified that the taliban took over again? having a monopoly on violence doesn't actually require being popular, and it's not a big secret that they cause huge amounts of suffering
your same logic is saying random africans are happy about living under warlords just because they have the same religion and ethnicity, but in fact most people don't like living under violent regimes that kidnap kids and chop heads off anyone that doesn't pay the monthly labor tax. no amount of indoctrination is going to convince ordinary people it's a good thing to have their kids conscripted
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
true, but the Taliban are not like that.
so did many liberals in the USA when Trump won if the media focuses on them, you can make anyone see anything. Especially the big city slikers
(can't believe I am literally defening the taliban)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Lmfao like the entire country turned on the Taliban when the US rolled in in 2001. Radical muzzie leaders who swore they had the backing of the Afghan people were sold out by their brothers for the cost of stale MRE cookies.
The larger populace just supports whoever will give them the most money and has the most ability to drop bombs on their heads. Thereโs literally zero loyalty beyond the immediate family.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Did bush tell you this? lmao
u see the irony between the statements?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I think thatโs only true if the invading military isnโt perfectly ok with killing huge quantities of the civilian population
Romans killed a third of Gaul, British killed tons of Africans and Indians, and mostly things calmed down for both of them
Then again Nazis/Japs dealt with partisans in Russia/China forever and ended up losing even though they were happy killing a ton of them, but thatโs mostly because they were too overextended to clean things up like they wanted to. The Red Army/Chinese Armies beat them, not the guerrillas
I just think guerrillas arenโt a big threat if youโre fine with killing a lot of men women and children
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Look at Native Americans they fought forever until there was like 20 left
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah and we gave them little shitholes in Wyoming and killed most of them. My point exactly, guerrillas only threatening if you donโt wanna kill them all
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
And they knew how to live without WiFi
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
There weren't very many to begin with and were outnumbered like 100:1
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Yeah but they were just bonking each other with branches and shit. Then one day, frogs and bongs arrived and went "lmao wanna do some real damage? Take this boomstick" and their population halved overnight.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Thatโs why the Second Amendment needs to protect IEDs, MANPADs and ATGMs
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It would take some incredibly contrived circumstances for that kind of genocide to really be worth the costs, approaching a point where you might as well just nuke half the planet
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Idk sounds plausible to me
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Well if the alternative is you losing anything is worth the cost
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's not how it works when you're the invader lol, there are definitely worse outcomes than white peace
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
yeah and if you wanna go to the mall you have to do the same. That will show the chinx
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The sheer amount of isnโt enough to stop an invasion but I wouldnโt want to patrol cities and suburbs where millions of people literally have such hard wet dreams about it that they have to take a cold shower every night just to get back to bed.
Sounds like a shitty place to invade.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Amerimutts continue to have no idea what war means. If you get invaded by anybody, your houses get fricked, your kids randomly die or disappear, your neighborhood becomes a mine infested wasteland and you become a sad little beaten dog of misery. If anyone in that state "fights back" that person is completely mental knowing full well that the occupying force will retaliate by raping the next group of innocent teenage women and shooting up some more suspects of doing the same thing. You become a tool if you get invaded.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context