Reported by:

Girl knife fight.

https://twitter.com/Lee_H_E/status/1557562861102186497
80
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>IDK why this is funny but if China did attempt a land invasion via amphibious assault they have to effectively go through >Military blockades >Urban gangbangers >Suburban gunslingers >Rural militias Citizens armed to the teeth. Besides our oceanic advantage no one is invading us

Lol this r-slur actually thinks any of these groups (except the actual military) could stand against a foreign military. Even the chinks could handle a few gangbangers and gunnuts.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

afghanistan but orders of magnitude worse?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Is that even possible?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Like 1% of Afghans had outdated hand-me-down Soviet equipment, do you know how many burgers have modern guns? I'm not convinced all the official militaries on the planet combined (including America's) could firmly hold America if even 10% of the population was fighting back, shitty informal guerillas are already proven to be monstrously effective even against modern heavy equipment

Assuming it doesn't balkanize and everyone starts shooting each other, at least

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

afghanies also had religious cause and fanatical devotion to their holy book. burgers only care about gasoline and macdonalds availability

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Most afghans hate the taliban, it really wasn't that many people fighting back :marseyshrug: I imagine there's a higher proportion of rightoids begging for an excuse to shoot, than there were people resisting the US in afghanistan

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Most afghans hate the taliban

this is top cope. "not my president" secularist style :marseyxd:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lmfao like the entire country turned on the Taliban when the US rolled in in 2001. Radical muzzie leaders who swore they had the backing of the Afghan people were sold out by their brothers for the cost of stale MRE cookies.

The larger populace just supports whoever will give them the most money and has the most ability to drop bombs on their heads. Thereโ€™s literally zero loyalty beyond the immediate family.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lmfao like the entire country turned on the Taliban when the US rolled in in 2001. Radical muzzie leaders who swore they had the backing of the Afghan people were sold out by their brothers for the cost of stale MRE cookies.

Did bush tell you this? lmao :#marseybush:

The larger populace just supports whoever will give them the most money and has the most ability to drop bombs on their heads. Thereโ€™s literally zero loyalty beyond the immediate family.

Most afghans hate the taliban

u see the irony between the statements?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

???? did you not see how many afghans were horrified that the taliban took over again? having a monopoly on violence doesn't actually require being popular, and it's not a big secret that they cause huge amounts of suffering

your same logic is saying random africans are happy about living under warlords just because they have the same religion and ethnicity, but in fact most people don't like living under violent regimes that kidnap kids and chop heads off anyone that doesn't pay the monthly labor tax. no amount of indoctrination is going to convince ordinary people it's a good thing to have their kids conscripted

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Afghans educated in english posting on twatter aren't average afghans.

The america sponsored regime was also an islamic regime but I believe the rurals would like talibs more for their purer shariah. Remember the afghan monarchy fell cause the queen took off her veil at a meeting they are a very orthodox people.

![](/images/16602079836147206.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

but in fact most people don't like living under violent regimes that kidnap kids and chop heads off anyone that doesn't pay the monthly labor tax

true, but the Taliban are not like that.

???? did you not see how many afghans were horrified that the taliban took over again?

so did many liberals in the USA when Trump won if the media focuses on them, you can make anyone see anything. Especially the big city slikers

(can't believe I am literally defening the taliban)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

Burgers live concentrated in cities and most would die without access to 24/7 running water, electricity etc. Plus I think even Afg could have been won if burgers went scorched earth enough. They fight with medieval ethics, act like Timur and they'll fall in line. :marseyshrug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think thatโ€™s only true if the invading military isnโ€™t perfectly ok with killing huge quantities of the civilian population

Romans killed a third of Gaul, British killed tons of Africans and Indians, and mostly things calmed down for both of them

Then again Nazis/Japs dealt with partisans in Russia/China forever and ended up losing even though they were happy killing a ton of them, but thatโ€™s mostly because they were too overextended to clean things up like they wanted to. The Red Army/Chinese Armies beat them, not the guerrillas

I just think guerrillas arenโ€™t a big threat if youโ€™re fine with killing a lot of men women and children

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Look at Native Americans they fought forever until there was like 20 left

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah and we gave them little shitholes in Wyoming and killed most of them. My point exactly, guerrillas only threatening if you donโ€™t wanna kill them all

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah but they were just bonking each other with branches and shit. Then one day, frogs and bongs arrived and went "lmao wanna do some real damage? Take this boomstick" and their population halved overnight.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

There weren't very many to begin with and were outnumbered like 100:1

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

And they knew how to live without WiFi

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Thatโ€™s why the Second Amendment needs to protect IEDs, MANPADs and ATGMs

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It would take some incredibly contrived circumstances for that kind of genocide to really be worth the costs, approaching a point where you might as well just nuke half the planet

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>ChinX

:marseyhmm:

>nuke half the planet for r-slurred reasons

:marseyhmmm:

Idk sounds plausible to me

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Well if the alternative is you losing anything is worth the cost

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's not how it works when you're the invader lol, there are definitely worse outcomes than white peace

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The only reason Afghanistan was such a failure was due to the unique limitations of the American military, and not in any way due to the skill of Afghani fighters or the merits of guerilla warfare. Americans will never succeed in a single occupation of a nation that hasn't already had its male population decimated. They're too unwilling to comit retributive acts against the local populace i.e., "War Crimes" The British colonials managed to subdue entire vast swathes of the middle east because when one of theirs was killed they'd kill 100 of the locals in revenge, the same is true for the Turks. If the Chinese, Russians, or even Iranians or Pakistanis where the ones to occupy Afghanistan the Sunni Islamic forces would never have managed to "liberate" or "conquer" their nation back depending on your viewpoint. An American resistance against any such nations would see the same failures. Modern technology such as drones, surveillance cameras, and even simple things like ID's render too many advantages to an occupying force that doesn't have to worry about things like "The Press" or its own citizens bleeding hearts.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

yeah and if you wanna go to the mall you have to do the same. That will show the chinx

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The sheer amount of :marseygunnut: isnโ€™t enough to stop an invasion but I wouldnโ€™t want to patrol cities and suburbs where millions of people literally have such hard wet dreams about it that they have to take a cold shower every night just to get back to bed.

Sounds like a shitty place to invade.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Amerimutts continue to have no idea what war means. If you get invaded by anybody, your houses get fricked, your kids randomly die or disappear, your neighborhood becomes a mine infested wasteland and you become a sad little beaten dog of misery. If anyone in that state "fights back" that person is completely mental knowing full well that the occupying force will retaliate by raping the next group of innocent teenage women and shooting up some more suspects of doing the same thing. You become a tool if you get invaded. :marseypoor:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.