Unable to load image
Reported by:

:marseysailor:UK's newest and largest aircraft carrier broke down on the 2nd day of a mission to the US :marseybong: :marseylaugh:

https://www.businessinsider.in/international/news/uks-newest-and-largest-aircraft-carrier-broke-down-on-the-2nd-day-of-a-mission-to-the-us/articleshow/93853496.cms

The carrier, which has a crew of 1,600, spent fewer than 90 days at sea during its first two years of service after suffering multiple leaks, according to The Guardian.

:#taylaugh:

RULE BRITANNIA, BRITANNIA RULES THE WAVES!!

:marseyredcoat::marseyredcoat::marseyredcoat::marseyredcoat:

172
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Newest and largest

>Still has a ramp

![](/images/16618021561324835.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

angled-saxons

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Cope slope

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Seriously tbh I'm sure USA would just give them the tech lul why do bongs not have catobar? Its a 70k ton ship too, such a waste to build large ones like that with ramps.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Carrier catapults go all the way back to WWII. So them not having one is assuredly for some stupid reason and not that they don't have the tech.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Because the bongs probably would just have more problems maintaining CATOBAR systems, they’ve already been using American navy and coastguard engineering crew for years to make up for their deficiencies

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Dude it's one of the main reasons. Europoors just get equipment for driving and flying around their shit country. And they know if they need power projection they go to the US

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's easier with nuclear power because you've already got the steam to operate them, but yeah, it seems like a weird choice if you're going to build a carrier that big.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lmao 🀣

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sloped peepees are more powerful

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I thought bongistan had the worlds 2nd most powerful navy after burgeristan.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#taylaugh: :#taylaugh:

That's probably China at this point tbh.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Probably unironically correct. I've seen the russoid Navy with my own eyes in Murmansk and it was like taking a trip to the 1950s. Half their base had been turned into a coal plant, ships we would mothball they just let rust and sink so that they have all these ancient shitheaps half sunk in their ports, and every sailor we met looked like he was ready to rope at any given moment lmao

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The biggest indictment on the Soviet Navy to me is:

>Develop an advanced hunter-killer attack submarine that can dash at 55+ knots

>Pioneer pre-computer automated industrial controls to allow a small crew to fit in it's small hull required for speed

>Develop a never-replicated molten-lead-cooled nuclear reactor to produce obscene power in a tiny package

>Like half the production models become inoperable because the shore-based heating systems just fricking fall apart due to alcoholism and graft lmao

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The US has an almost comically OP navy - even if the all the world’s other navies ganged up on you, you’d still win.

Obviously we take the piss out of Burgers for being fat and r-slurred and constantly dying in mass shootings and stuff, but your navy is fricking rad tbf.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyno: Social spending

:marseyyes: Naval spending

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This, but unironically

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.