Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The liberal Christian view that Paul was corrupting Christianity like 30 years in is always such a mind boggling hot take I don't get why people bring it up.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think it's because a lot of Protestantism goes very heavily on the Pauline epistles for doctrine, so it's awkward when you want to say that gay s*x and the rest of it is totally fine and Christian, since St Paul is instructing the local churches "I heard one of you guys was banging his step mom. Stop that shit". So they have to fall back on "Well Paul corrupted it all" and "Jesus never said anything about abortion in the Gospels so that means He was pro-choice" and other rubbish.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Funny enough that is what the early gnostics thought.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.