!historychads in. Pretty good article about Stolypin

>When the second session of the Duma displayed radical tendencies, he simply ordered the Duma dissolved and had several members of parliament who had associated with terrorists arrested. He rigged election rules to ensure that future parliaments would have far more cooperative legislators.

Why is Russian history full of cute twinks?

It's the same story over and over again.

Lawlessness->One man swoops in promising stability->doesn't change any structure ->kills a metric frick ton of people->centralizes power to a degree never seen before ->is killed or dies->lawlessness

I fail to care about whoever this is or how they are different from any other ruzzian BIPOC

Bolsheviks would have failed if wypipos had been competent.

They were laughably incompetent. When they aproached pesants for aid. Peasant asked what in it for us?

>Nothing. When we win. You go back being dirt farmer.

What did pesants do? Nothing. Watched on sideline when reds r*ped wypipos. All they needed was to give inch to people and revolution would have failed.

Stolypin was so successful at stopping radicalism that radicals assassinated him in 1911 and overthrew the government in 1917 ... twice

  .-""-.
 /,..___\
() {_____}
  (/-@-@-\)
  {`-=^=-'}
  {  `-'  } Merry Fistmas!
   {     }
    `---'

Snapshots:

• ghostarchive.org

• archive.org

• archive.ph (click to archive)