https://old.reddit.com/r/antiwork/comments/1g42tm3/british_government_proposes_ozempic_for/
Yeah it's old but I don't give a shit.
Suddenly "muh medical freedom" matters lmao
Unironicly wouldn't be against it
So you can doordash and ubereats more fast food lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Now that roe has been overturned i anticipate the US government will require/force new conscripts to take ozempic as part of basic to deal with the fat problem when WW3 fully breaks out.
https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2023/10/13/nearly-70-of-active-service-members-are-overweight-report-finds/
https://www.military.com/daily-news/2022/09/28/new-pentagon-study-shows-77-of-young-americans-are-ineligible-military-service.html
!slots100
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
WW3 won't be fought with much ground troops lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
why does Russia/Ukraine/Israel fight that way rn then? Why is NK conscripting 1.4million troops? Why did selective service become automatic this year?
!slots100
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Because they are fighting with WW2 tech and would lose against any military with 2020s tech.
Kamala will win.
!slots100
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Well yeah because they are more forever-skirmishs that are meant to put pressure on you opponent until they concede.
If World War 3 happened and they need battles to be won quick and concisely, then you don't need as much ground troops just being seat warmers for occupied foriegn territory
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
why do you think WW3 would be quick outside of a global thermonuclear apocalyspe happening? Both ww1 and ww2 lasted like half a decade or more and i cant think of a recent war that didnt last like 5 years at least outside of africa.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
It turns out Jane Roe wasn't pregnant, she just got fat.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
lol, i know you joke, butt the ruling in roe wasnt just about abortion butt a right to medical privacy and bodily autonomy.
!slots123
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Well yes but actually no. The Supreme Court in Dobbs distinguished Roe from Griswold (the contraception case), and kitty-footed around attacking the underlying principle.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Thomas said in his concurrance that it should extend to griswold and obbergefell and suggested rhat thats next
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There is a reason Justice Thomas writes a concurring opinion on everything and doesn't get to write that in the opinion of the Court.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
because racism
!slots105
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context