.webp?h=8 "Merry Fistmas!")
https://x.com/Phil_Lewis_/status/1590209969374126080
Michigan voters have voted yes to Proposal 3, enshrining the right to an abortion in the state constitution.https://t.co/AyqDEiA8QJ pic.twitter.com/2BIWx0qMB6
— philip lewis (@Phil_Lewis_) November 9, 2022
Also it's funny how rightoids will complain about bleeding hearts and then say "noooo not the heckin fetoids 
"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
How’s that red wave coming along?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The "return it to the states" argument makes no sense because if you just want "smaller" government the ideal solution is to completely legalize it and make it a personal decision.
Thinking that "the state" is the ideal size is just showcasing that you care more about winning rather than removing the overarching power of government bodies.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It makes perfect sense. People want to be governed by those who were born and raised in the same area that they were, not by bureacrats they didn't elected 2,000 miles away.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah states are totally politically homogenous and the politicians that rise to the top are totally blue collar just like you dude
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Both points are irrelevant. Being governed by someone from the same place as you doesn't mean they need to be a copy of you, only that they grew up alongside your people and are intimately aware of the points of pride and issues that define your area, regardless of whether they agree or disagree on these points. Again, a bureaucrat 2,000 miles away has only spoken to a token representative of your people at best and either does not think about your state at all during lawmaking or does a scan of wikipedia and calls it a day before voting for the interest of their constituents over you anyways.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
incorrect. my arbitrarily sized entity is the correct one, and it is you that is misinforming people
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
the competition between political systems fosters progress, especially if citizens can move from one to the other easily.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Balkanizing it even further is the only righteous option then
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
based city states like ancient greece
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
To be clear im not arguing for or against, im saying that pro lifers view it as such and will take their wins where they can.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I know, hearing that r-slurred argument made me feel like I was taking crazy pills.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Being against child murder being used as birth contol isn’t wingcuck, it’s basic human morality. That anyone makes this about “foid healthcare” is legitimately r-slurred and also dehumanized foids into just baby makers who will inevitably always get pregnant no matter what
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah hard to believe but there are even democrats who believe in Christ and know slaughtering unborn children is wrong. His One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church is billions strong and the crimes against humanity of the secularists will face His judgement
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
This argument would have more merit a certain party wasn't also against other forms of birth control.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Just don't be a whore if you don't want a baby
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is basically it; Republicans are actually upset that women are having s*x, not so much that a fetus is killed.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I wonder why people would have a moral stance against that
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Again, this argument would hold more water if cons weren't trying to get rid of contraception. You have problems with women being whores, not so much the killing of the bastards.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I don't think anyone cares about black women getting abortions so it's a mixed bag
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Republicans sure use it as a talking point; Margaret Sanger was into eugenics, more black infants in NYC are aborted than carried to term, there is a genocide against minority babies.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Year of the Chud OVER
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context