.webp?h=11 "Nuzzles, pounces on you, UwU, you're so warm!..")
COMMUNITY NOTEDJust as it's unfair that men can reproduce longer than women, here's something else that's unfair: women simply don't crave sex and relationships as much as men do. For many men, their love rival isn't Chad--it's a happy life alone. Link in replies. pic.twitter.com/T4ORU3ki3Z
— Cartoons Hate Her! (@CartoonsHateHer) March 11, 2025
from CHH.
Of course, plenty of men will say—either directly or indirectly—that the solution to all our problems (read: their problems) is to somehow "return" to a time when women couldn't earn their own incomes, and thus, were forced to settle. This is the reason they didn't freak out about porn so much until Onlyfans came around—they will reliably seethe over an Onlyfans model being able to buy a luxury car as a result of s*x work, but don't seem bothered by the luxurious life of porn producers, or Andrew Tate's sprawling and dimly-lit man cave. These men might mask their agenda with concern for birth rates or veneration of homeschool moms, but a lot of it is just about maximizing their own sexual options, or the sexual options of the men who listen to them. It's the male version of decreeing that any forty-year-old man who dates a twenty-five-year-old woman is a libertarian.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This gets better and better.
It doesn't matter what you call it, women would still rather be single than be with many men. Despite your insistance that this is some culture war, only a tiny minority of women are like Andrea Dworkin (who ended up in a weird partnership with a cute twink anyway).
No part of that overlaps with my quote. You are 0/2.
Lol. Who is the one reflexively downmarseying the other party here? Or who edited their comment when they got pantsed? You are a terminal redditor.
This goes back to my Dworkin comment. Women aren't reading books about surveys of married people. They are looking at people in their lives, and they see what's going on with their married and divorced friends. That's why they are setting a high standard for who they want to marry - becuase they don't want to be a single mother or a "married single mother" (i.e. a situation where their husband is basically another child).
She has a monetized substack and knows how to get engagement.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You're such a smug r-slur you still haven't addressed what I've said, or even understood it.
Is your assertion that there are no women like this? If so, then you're full of cope there's no point in having a conversation with you.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is your motte? Sure, I know women like that, but that's not why most women turn down a date. And again, you clearly have contempt for them, so why the frick do you care that they're single?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Look up r-slur, it's what I said in the first post. The fact that you don't even know I said it shows you are having a conversation with someone you made up.
Do the single [men] and their married defenders not get to talk? I see a ton of people angrily responding to this essay, so your argument goes both ways. Maybe it's just fun arguing on the internet.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You also said:
So your point goes from, "Some women turn down perfectly good men" to "All women make suboptimal choices because they resent men." And it's clear that ultimately you hate women but don't have the stomach (nor butthole) for the bussy pill.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context