None
119
:marseyitsover:
None

Folk in the comments just as confused as me.

None

					
					

Rihanna is so disgusting for supporting abusive scrotes like Johnny and Chris Brown :marseysick:

![](/images/16685620835821528.webp)

None

He's her former jiu jitsu instructor, here's a vid of them training together earlier this year! https://x.com/giseleofficial/status/1496514489583292432

None

Modelling pics:

![](/images/16685167534928527.webp)

![](/images/1668516753986161.webp)

![](/images/16685169756635294.webp)

![](/images/16685179401080782.webp)

None
214
Know your worth kweens, 10 bill is minimum if I look like this
None
Reported by:

None

BUTT CHEEEKS CLENCHED

:#marseyxd:

None

The media, movies, and society consider s*x to be the most coveted pleasure in the world.

Often, they correlate happiness and contentment with an active s*x life. Whether this is true or not is still open for debate.

It turns out, today more younger men are going through "dry spells".

According to a recent report analyzing data from 2008 to 2018, men are having less s*x than ever. Not just men --- but men are the ones making headlines.

"[In the study], we found that from 2009 to 2018, fewer adults engaged in a range of partnered sexual activities ... Compared to adult participants in the 2009 survey, adults in the 2018 group were significantly more likely to report no penile-vaginal intercourse in the prior year, the researchers found. Study participants were also significantly less likely to report engaging in any other sexual behaviors examined in the study, such as oral s*x or anal s*x."

The decrease in sexual activity was particularly noteworthy in young male populations. While the phrasing is a little awkward (an increase in sexual activity = decreased sexual activity), this is noteworthy information.

"The researchers found that sexual inactivity had increased from 19 percent to 31 percent among men age 18 to 24. Men and women age 25 to 34 also reported an increase in sexual inactivity during the time period."

The drought has become a global situation. People are blaming social media, busy lifestyles, and video games. However, they are ignoring its many benefits and most importantly, the fact that men are being more mindful of their s*x life.

But I am of the opinion that this is for their own good.

Five reasons younger men are deciding to have less s*x --- and why it's good for them


1. Men are prioritizing careers and interests over s*x.

It is said that s*x doesn't allure men anymore --- you can't state a more misinformed statement than this. Men are still fascinated by the idea of a steamy lovemaking session. But s*x is not the alpha and omega of their life anymore.

The younger men are realizing different venues for gaining those endorphins and dopamine that the majority only aim to achieve from s*x. A good career, workout routine, well-being measures, and hobbies give us pleasure as well.

Your best memories are made of nature's scenic views, child's laughter, hitting milestones, landing your dream job, and the crazy time you spent dancing with your friends. It is not limited to s*x.

Consequently, younger men are more passionate about their goals and are taking more vacations.

2. Getting laid is not the symbol of masculinity anymore.

Men are afraid to admit that they are keeping it in their pants for months. The archaic concept of having s*x symbolizing power and masculinity made them believe that the lack of sexual intercourse makes them "less manly."

The younger generation is acknowledging this flawed concept and is eager to rectify it. The realization that their happiness doesn't depend on s*x anymore has positively impacted the way they approach relationships.

The younger men don't force themselves to sleep around just for the sake of it. As a result, mental health issues such as stress, frustration, shame, self-image issues, and low self-confidence have taken a back seat.

3. Men are seeking long-term stability in a relationship.

Surprisingly, men have taken the initiative to invest time only in those relationships that promise something more valuable than s*x, and most preferably, long-term stability. They are apprehensive to invest their efforts in anything less than that.

The number of men swiping right on online dating apps just for "Netflix and chill" has significantly reduced. While people still go on first dates with the plans of getting laid, most men are now waiting for multiple dates before sharing the bed with them or making out.

This, in turn, is promoting compatible, positive, and happy relationships. It is also saving them from a lot of unwanted trauma and complications that come with a failed relationship.

4. Men aged 18 and more are exploring better ways for intellectual growth than s*x

Society has even stigmatized virginity. According to some social constructs, losing virginity marks the transition from childhood to adulthood. Well, the young men are proving that age-old notion wrong.

Gone are the days when being a virgin or going through a dry spell was misconstrued as "uncool". Given the rising awareness around significant topics such as sexuality and consent, fewer men are pressured into sharing their bodies before they are entirely ready.

Instead of basing their intellectual growth on bringing ladies (or guys) home every other night, men aged 18 and more are choosing more efficient approaches and turning out to be more socially, intellectually, and emotionally mature than their elders. This justifies the raging number of young entrepreneurs.

5. Women are getting more serious about their pleasure.

The s*x-positive movement destigmatized pleasure for women. It gave them a voice to ask for their rights to satisfaction in an intimate or casual relationship.

Finally, women have begun taking their pleasure seriously, and no, they won't settle for the bare minimum. While there's a rise in women engaging in casual s*x, we are also witnessing more and more women getting confident about their sexuality.

The tendency of women to agree to sexual intercourse in hopes of saving their relationship is residing in the shade. Now, they are unafraid to say "no" before they are absolutely willing.

An apparent upsurge in women ditching casual s*x due to the lack of satisfaction is also visible.  The saying "there's plenty of fish in the sea", no longer stands and has removed some options for the men.

None

None

Just watch this video and you'll see exactly what I mean. I've never seen Ellen crack up like that before with any other guest. Moids are just jealous because they haven't achieved a fraction of what Amy has achieved.

Some redditors even tried to accuse her of r*pe, which is r-slurred because queens can't r*pe moids. It's physically impossible

None

https://x.com/MarinaMedvin/status/1590554599030591488

I don’t know how to process this. Montana voters were asked whether babies born alive should be given basic human necessities… and 226K people said no.

https://x.com/AbbyJohnson/status/1590575886432337920

I’m horrified that even ONE person would vote in Montana to deny babies healthcare after they’ve already been born. They’re basically saying they want the babies left out to die.

We need Jesus to save our nation. Desperately.

https://x.com/JesseKellyDC/status/1590559320705753089

Lotta people angry and horrified about Montana voting to let a baby die after birth.

But the devil is in the details and this is how horrific stuff passes sometimes when it shouldn’t.

Read that. That’s how it read on the ballot. How would you vote?

https://x.com/CatholicVote/status/1590550067760402432

Last night Democrats in Montana voted to ban medical care for an infant born alive after a botched abortion.

An innocent baby gasping for help…banned by law from getting help.

Let that sink in.

So much for the overwhelming majority that arrdrama fetuscels claimed to have lol. You can't even pass anti abortion shit in Montana with the most favorable wording possible :marseylaugh:. We seriously need more mayo scrotes to be aborted though

Jesus was a feminist and supported queens getting abortions btw

None

					
					

"You OK?" a boy asks me in the middle of consensual s*x. His hands are firm on my hips, his breathing ragged in my ear. I turn my head to the side, twist my mouth into a grimace. He's having trouble getting off, he tells me. He'll finish soon, he promises. One quick thrust.

"It hurts," I tell him.

"You want to stop?" He says without pausing. There's a slight annoyance in his voice as he continues, "I'm really close."

I don't remember the feel of this boy's hands, I don't remember his caresses or kisses, I don't remember the words he said to me before we started having s*x. I do remember his heaviness pressed against me, the way he pinned me down by the very act of what we we're doing; his erratic, persistent, insistent movements, his loud pleasure and my pain. I remember speaking this quiet, muffled answer: "Kind of." But it's unclear --- I will remind myself later, for days, for weeks, for years --- what exactly I have said "kind of" to. It's too noncommittal, and it's too late.

"Just let me finish," he says. "It won't be much longer." He hurries and then he comes. He's slumping on top of me, and though I'm not sure why, I'm starting to cry. When he sees me, he's angry. Why didn't I tell him I was crying, and why didn't I say I wanted him to stop? He feels weird now; he feels guilty. I have ruined this for him. I am always ruining things for him.

"I tried to tell you," I say. I thought I did. Didn't I? He's pulling on his clothes and observing me with disgust. I'm naked and confused, mascara-streaked and ugly, alone on a hotel bed. He tells me I don't get it. Get what? I think, with desperation. I pull the covers to my chin. He's already crossed the room. Get what?

I shower and I cry and I can't figure out what it is that I'm supposed to get. When I emerge, we don't talk about it. I never speak of it again.

Here's a recent search in my Google history: "Is it r*pe if you ask to stop in the middle of having s*x?" Yesterday, today, and in this very moment, girls on forums across the Internet are sending confused, desperate questions into the ether. "I didn't stop him," one girl writes. "I just laid there silent until he stopped thrusting." "Is it r*pe?" Another asks, her words urgent, awaiting someone, anyone, to validate her feelings about what has happened to her. "It started to hurt," she writes. "I told him to stop and he kept going."

"The first time he did it I did not give my consent, the second time I don't know why I asked him to have s*x with me," another writes. "I don't know if it's considered r*pe anymore because of the second time." And then again: "Was it r*pe?" Girl after girl after girl asks in a million different ways. "Was it r*pe?" They ask strangers from across states, countries, and continents, hoping for confirmation from anonymous people who will never know their names.

Did you say 'No'? Men and women alike want to know. If not 'No,' then 'Stop'? Had you already consented? How forceful was he? How forceful were you? How loud did you say it? Did he think you were kidding? Did he mishear you? Did he hear you at all? Did he get distracted? Was he unable to stop himself? Did he apologize after? Did you sleep with him again? Is this something you've done before? Are you the kind of girl who sleeps with strangers? Are you manipulative? Are you misleading? Are you a tease? Are you a slut?

"Between the abortion issue and a woman's 'prerogative to change her mind' at any given moment," one angry, anonymous forum-goer writes, "people will eventually squeeze all of the natural enjoyment out of s*x and reduce it to merely a legal act of business between two consenting parties."

My r*pe is not r*pe to attorneys or lawyers or judges. And if another woman has gone through something like this, it might not be her definition of r*pe, either.

The R*pe, Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN) lets me know via their website: "It doesn't matter if you think your partner means yes, or if you've already started having s*x --- 'No' also means 'Stop.' If you proceed despite your partner's expressed instruction to stop, you have not only violated basic codes of morality and decency, you may have also committed a crime under the laws of your state." Now I have to wonder if my scenario "counts" as r*pe. "Kind of" is not exactly expressed instruction. It is not a "No."

Recently, a friend and I were talking about our relationships, both past and present; the men who treated us well and the ones who didn't. Maybe it was the influence of alcohol or the dim lighting of the dark bar where we stood, or maybe it was the safety of friendship. We began to open up. "I think," she confided in me, "I've been r*ped at least twice by different men whom I've dated." I told my friend that I was pretty sure I had been, too.

Later, we admitted to each other that we'd never said those words out loud before. These men r*ped us, but even as we spoke our truths, we wanted to push them back in, to quantify what happened to us in a thousand different ways. But with solidarity came acceptance. Then we said it one more time, just to be sure: "He r*ped me."

My r*pe is not r*pe to attorneys or lawyers or judges. And if another woman has gone through something like this, it might not be her definition of r*pe, either. I'm not calling in a jury, and I'm not asking anyone's opinion. "R*pe" covers a multitude of experiences; it is gray and blurry and messy. In calling what happened to me "r*pe," it now has a name that takes the responsibility off of me and puts it on someone else, regardless of whether that person goes to prison for it or not.

In defining my experience as "r*pe," I'm no longer to blame. This doesn't change the fact that it happened, or the fact that there are still times --- before s*x, during s*x --- when I tense up in momentary fear that if I ask to stop, the person who I am with might not. What has changed is my strength in these moments. I am no longer scared to speak up. I no longer believe that anybody has the right to make decisions about my body for me but me, regardless of the situation.

To the girls who ask, *Was it r*pe? *I say this: Know that your experience should not be considered "normal" just because you didn't think you could categorize it as "legitimate r*pe." Know that many people will look at r*pe in terms of black and white, "No" and "Stop." Be wary. Hold out for the partners who ask if it's OK before they touch you, who ask and mean it, who in a moment of consensual ambiguity will pause the entire act until it becomes clear. Know that these people exist. Don't let negative experiences prevent you from trusting someone.

Know that you can always say "No." But if you're scared, if you're unsure, if your mouth won't form the words because you're so overcome with emotion or because you don't know what he'll do to you if you say it, remember this: You didn't ask for it. It didn't happen because you were too drunk or too dumb or dressed too scantily. It happened because the person you were with was greedy and wanted to take something that wasn't theirs. If you couldn't speak up then, speak up now. Be loud. Don't let anyone's questions marginalize your feelings or your value or your beliefs or your pain. Feel it all.

https://www.bustle.com/articles/135171-i-didnt-say-no-but-it-was-still-r*pe

None
None

Also it's funny how rightoids will complain about bleeding hearts and then say "noooo not the heckin fetoids :marseypearlclutch:"

None

None

Bumping into someone at a bodega counts as a date:

i'm so surprised by how common this appears to be. given the ratio and density of people i thought NYC would've been a great city for dating + wifesearching/husbandmaxxing. but apparently it sucks for that?? why?


NYC is the easiest place in the world to have an absolutely incredible first date with a smart, charming, attractive person, and the hardest place in the world to make it to a fourth date with them

If you aren't rich then she isn't impressed:

Women sort of make the rules of the game, men are just trying to impress you. Not impressed? Many men trying many strategies


They’re not trying to impress me, they try to impress their own ego

Many such cases:

What does the woman get from this transaction?


Some guy pretends you are beautiful for a few hours (you are actually mid and they are horny)

Homos stay winning under all circumstances:

> guy takes you to St.Patricks Cathedral

guy tells you about how is grandfather killed a british soldier because he stole his "potatoes"

guy gets in to a street fight with a drunken Armenian after he laughs at both of you outside the irish bar

guy deletes grindr

Post 2 because I cbf making two posts:

![](/images/1667906808060555.webp)

Yasss girl ditch that scrote:

How she talks about her hometown guy earlier in her timeline:

![](/images/16679068865155709.webp)

Can't believe chuds are still rating women like this smh:

I can't speak for the entire Midwest but she's a grand rapids, mi 4. maybe a 5 depending on the side of town & amount of alcohol involved.


Humbly decline, she's a NY 4 maybe. We'll pass her over to the south.

![](/images/16679068083055294.webp)

None
Reported by:
None

					
					

:#marseyobamacope:

@FrozenChosen discuss

None
None

Stolen from /r/wpt

Source :sciencejak:

None
82
Hot tip for you more generous ladies
None

https://x.com/cavseway/status/1588231601934286850

nobody wants to see that decomposing corpse at a lingerie show

:marseyhesright:

None
Reported by:
124
Which one of you queens did this?
None

This is the type of energy all queens need

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.