A Winnipeg man has been charged with multiple offences after s*x dolls designed to look like children were seized from his home.
According to police, officers with the Canada Border Services Agency in Vancouver intercepted a package from China destined to Winnipeg and alerted the police service's Internet Child Exploitation unit.
Winnipeg police took possession of the package on Aug 29 and found it contained a s*x doll anatomically designed to look like a pre-pubescent child. The doll is illegal in Canada under child pornography laws.
"Approximately 20 anatomically correct female dolls ranging from newborn to early teens were located along with clothing/accessories intended for the dolls," police wrote in a news release. "Some of the dolls had been physically altered from their original state."
Of course redditors aren't having it
Gross, no doubt. But I think there is a debate here. Would this doll lead this guy to eventually harming real human children or would the doll be enough for him to get his rocks off enough that he doesn't need to move to humans.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Does this doll satiate the libertarian's lust for children, or does it make it stronger to the point where they'll ?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Did watching porn make the men in the west have more s*x, or did it make them have less s*x?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It made me want to have s*x more but since I turned into a raging gooner women turn me down more and as a result I have less s*x.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There's your answer.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I want to agree with you, but then that means i have to agree that child s*x dolls are good. Maybe child s*x dolls are like the police, a necessary evil to keep society functioning until we can get to the point where theyre not needed. Do child s*x dolls lead to less children being touched leading to less total libertarians?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I don' know, I am not a libertarian expert
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This statement just makes it seem like your hoping the govt doesnt assign you to the research.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I don't get it but okay
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It was a clumsy attempt at a joke. I'm just imagining some poor bastard that gets assigned to figure out if child s*x dolls lead to less libertarians.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
That's obesity's fault.
<-- too fat for s*x
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
If science were actually objective in the West, we could have a double-blinded placebo-controlled randomized clinical (criminal) trial. But nooooooo
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context