Unable to load image
Reported by:
  • WayOut : I JACKED OFF! PLEASE SOMEONE LET AEVANN KNOW I JACKED OFF, I DON'T WANT TO BE BANNED!!
  • whyareyou : I reported @WayOut for jacking off desu
  • DangerousBlackGuy : Im defecating as we speak

Consistent with Pharaoh @Aevann's instructions, all rDrama users must report what they got done last week. Failure to respond will be taken as a resignation.

Please reply to this post with approx. 5 bullets of what you accomplished last week and cc your hole !jannies.

Please do not send any DMs, links, or attachments.

Deadline is this Tuesday at 11:59pmEST.

103
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Rome has opted not to seek formal excommunication in hopes that the problem dies off with time

You mean people who are more liberal, thus would advocate for such things leaving or not even joining the church, so only the conservatives stay that will oppose this? I mean it's also where the Church shrinks a lot, and a lot of people leave Catholicism.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Protestant congregations that have changed teachings to conform to secular morality have cratered even harder than Catholics/Evangelicals. I think you should probably keep in mind that this is more about genuine faith than politics, which is why the liberal churches have fared worse than we have - once you say "God got that one wrong, oops" you're really just "playing church" rather than worshipping. I want a Church of people with genuine faith, not political actors seeking to conform the Church to their preferred vision of society.

I get frustrated with more right wing Catholics who want to pick and choose which teachings to follow, too, btw. You can ask @C333 or @nuclearshill :marseywave2:

But if you're curious, Pope Benedict XVI gave several speeches when he was a priest/cardinal on this very subject. An excerpt from one of those speeches Fr. Joseph Ratzinger (Benedict XVI) gave all the way back in 1969 about politics, the Church, and the decline of Christianity:

"The future of the Church can and will issue from those whose roots are deep and who live from the pure fullness of their faith. It will not issue from those who accommodate themselves merely to the passing moment or from those who merely criticize others and assume that they themselves are infallible measuring rods; nor will it issue from those who take the easier road, who sidestep the passion of faith, declaring false and obsolete, tyrannous and legalistic, all that makes demands upon men, that hurts them and compels them to sacrifice themselves. To put this more positively: The future of the Church, once again as always, will be reshaped by saints, by men, that is, whose minds probe deeper than the slogans of the day, who see more than others see, because their lives embrace a wider reality. Unselfishness, which makes men free, is attained only through the patience of small daily acts of self-denial. By this daily passion, which alone reveals to a man in how many ways he is enslaved by his own ego, by this daily passion and by it alone, a man's eyes are slowly opened. He sees only to the extent that he has lived and suffered. If today we are scarcely able any longer to become aware of God, that is because we find it so easy to evade ourselves, to flee from the depths of our being by means of the narcotic of some pleasure or other. Thus our own interior depths remain closed to us. If it is true that a man can see only with his heart, then how blind we are!

"How does all this affect the problem we are examining? It means that the big talk of those who prophesy a Church without God and without faith is all empty chatter. We have no need of a Church that celebrates the cult of action in political prayers. It is utterly superfluous. Therefore, it will destroy itself. What will remain is the Church of Jesus Christ, the Church that believes in the God who has become man and promises us life beyond death. The kind of priest who is no more than a social worker can be replaced by the psychotherapist and other specialists; but the priest who is no specialist, who does not stand on the [sidelines], watching the game, giving official advice, but in the name of God places himself at the disposal of man, who is beside them in their sorrows, in their joys, in their hope and in their fear, such a priest will certainly be needed in the future.

"Let us go a step farther. From the crisis of today the Church of tomorrow will emerge -- a Church that has lost much. She will become small and will have to start afresh more or less from the beginning. She will no longer be able to inhabit many of the edifices she built in prosperity. As the number of her adherents diminishes, so it will lose many of her social privileges. In contrast to an earlier age, it will be seen much more as a voluntary society, entered only by free decision. As a small society, it will make much bigger demands on the initiative of her individual members. Undoubtedly it will discover new forms of ministry and will ordain to the priesthood approved Christians who pursue some profession. In many smaller congregations or in self-contained social groups, pastoral care will normally be provided in this fashion. Along-side this, the full-time ministry of the priesthood will be indispensable as formerly. But in all of the changes at which one might guess, the Church will find her essence afresh and with full conviction in that which was always at her center: faith in the triune God, in Jesus Christ, the Son of God made man, in the presence of the Spirit until the end of the world. In faith and prayer she will again recognize the sacraments as the worship of God and not as a subject for liturgical scholarship.

"The Church will be a more spiritual Church, not presuming upon a political mandate, flirting as little with the Left as with the Right. It will be hard going for the Church, for the process of crystallization and clarification will cost her much valuable energy. It will make her poor and cause her to become the Church of the meek. The process will be all the more arduous, for sectarian narrow-mindedness as well as pompous self-will will have to be shed. One may predict that all of this will take time. The process will be long and wearisome as was the road from the false progressivism on the eve of the French Revolution -- when a bishop might be thought smart if he made fun of dogmas and even insinuated that the existence of God was by no means certain -- to the renewal of the nineteenth century. But when the trial of this sifting is past, a great power will flow from a more spiritualized and simplified Church. Men in a totally planned world will find themselves unspeakably lonely. If they have completely lost sight of God, they will feel the whole horror of their poverty. Then they will discover the little flock of believers as something wholly new. They will discover it as a hope that is meant for them, an answer for which they have always been searching in secret.

"And so it seems certain to me that the Church is facing very hard times. The real crisis has scarcely begun. We will have to count on terrific upheavals. But I am equally certain about what will remain at the end: not the Church of the political cult, which is dead already, but the Church of faith. It may well no longer be the dominant social power to the extent that she was until recently; but it will enjoy a fresh blossoming and be seen as man's home, where he will find life and hope beyond death.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

As a small society, it will make much bigger demands on the initiative of her individual members.

What did he mean by this.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Initiative to go out there and spread the Gospel, initiative to keep the remaining Church community strong.

Maintaining the Church, let alone evangelizing the general public, requires much more of modern faithful than past generations as our cultural significance is largely gone and the general attitude of common people has shifted to one of passive rejection or hostility rather than passive and largely unquestioned acceptance.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How to evangilize in the mordern world without people feeling annoyed when you try.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The success I've had both here and IRL comes less from directly trying to convince people and more from a combination of prayer and trying to provide an example of someone who genuinely believes it's true and tries to live it out to the best of their ability (if a bit sperg-ily).

I spend my energy with you and a few others like @tempest :marseywave2: not because I think you're suddenly going to change your minds in the middle of a conversation but because you're willing to ask thoughtful questions/arguments for me to respond to without degenerating into name calling and it's a public space where others do read what's been said. Maybe down the road things I've said will pop up in your heads, IDK. :marseyshrug: That plus I WFH with an easy email job so I have time until we start having children.

Oh, and I guess with atheists/libs, I also want to convince you Catholics aren't just mindless bigots.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's a lot of text that won't matter when you go to heck for defending the Whore of Babylon.

!lutherans

:#marseyluther:


Gavel to gavel coverage, powered by cable.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.