Unable to load image

Corporations that ditch queer consumers will lose big money, new study suggests :!marseysmirk2:

https://www.intomore.com/impact/corporations-that-ditch-queer-consumers-will-lose-big-money-new-study-suggests/

!chuds thoughts?

A growing number of companies have been folding to right wing boycotts and ditching DEI programs, particularly those that support LGBTQ+ employees. But by appeasing a vocal fringe, those companies are poised to lose significant revenue from the communities they've abandoned, a new study suggests.

The data comes from the HRC Foundation's 2024 LGBTQ+ Climate Survey, conducted in partnership with LGBTQ+ research firm Community Marketing & Insights. Between August 8 and 18, nearly 2,500 LGBTQ+ adults completed the survey, and the results detail stark implications for corporations who have turned their back on DEI.

80% respondents said they would boycott a company that rolled back DEI programs, and over half would urge others to boycott, including making negative reviews and social media posts. Overall, 75% said they would look negatively on said companies.

For LGBTQ+ employees, 19% said they would quit or start looking for a new job in the event their company dropped DEI initiatives. 72% said they would feel less accepted at work and one-third said their productivity would suffer.

Recently, LGBTQ+ consumers have been estimated to command more than $1.4 trillion in spending power. That number seems only poised to grow in the future as younger generations continue to overwhelmingly identify with the LGBTQ+ community.

And LGBTQ+ consumers care about where they are spending their money, taking note of signals of support. 87% of survey respondents said that sponsoring a Pride event indicates support. 93% agreed that donating to LGBTQ+ causes earning a 100% score on the HRC's Consumer Equality Index, which rates corporations for LGBTQ+ inclusive policies, indicates some support. As part of cutting DEI programs, many corporations have opted out of the HRC's CEI.

Thus far, the corporations that have rolled back DEI programs include Molson--Coors, Harley Davidson, Lowe's, Ford, Tractor Supply and Jack Daniel's. The recent backlash has come at the behest of right wing provocateur Robby Starbuck, who targets companies with DEI programs and incites followers to boycott.

"The LGBTQ+ community is an economic powerhouse, and we want to work for and support companies who support us," Orlando Gonzales, HRC Senior Vice President, Programs, Research, and Training summed up.

"Attacks on DEI initiatives are shortsighted and make our workplaces less safe and less inclusive for hard-working Americans of all demographics and backgrounds. This new data confirms that companies like Molson Coors, Ford, and others that abandon their values and backtrack from commitments to diversity, equity, and inclusion risk losing both top employee talent and consumer dollars."

34
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>80% would boycott a company that rolled back DEI

Bullshit

>19% of LGBT would quit

Bullshit

This is why these studies are such jokes. You can't actually ask people what they believe and assume that it will be borne out in actions. No way anywhere close to 80% of people are boycotting anything they actually want.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>were going to keep telling people love is love but going to end lingerie for toddlers department

:marseywitchtriggered:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This study hinges on taking leftoids at their word that they would boycott these companies when in fact, they won't


We need trans hedgehogs! Trans hedgehogs belong here! We love trans hedgehogs!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'll believe them when a notable number boycotts every product that contains slave cobalt.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You don't believe that leftoids would boycott Harley and Tractor Supply? Ignorant chud. They've been boycotting for 20 years straight

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Chick-fil-e is strong as ever, meanwhile Bud Light is doing major course correction with a Shane Gillis commercial lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Attacks on DEI initiatives are fricking shortsighted and make our workplaces less safe and less inclusive :marseylgbtflag2: for hard-working Americans :marseyamericanpearlclutch: of all demographics and backgrounds. This new data confirms that companies like Molson Coors, Ford, and others that abandon their values and backtrack from commitments to diversity, equity, and inclusion risk losing :marseygambling: both top employee talent and consumer dollars.

:#carpsurejan:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17265256853326933.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>big money

>2500 surveyed

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The number surveyed is fine, provided the rest of their methodology doesn't have any issues. The selection bias, on the other hand, is almost certainly enormous. :marseynatesilver:

The HRC Foundation, in conjunction with Community Marketing & Insights (CMI), and [sic] LGBTQ+ owned research firm, fielded the 2024 LGBTQ+ Climate Survey online between August 8-18, 2024. Respondents were purposefuly sampled from CMI's LGBTQ+ Research Pane, a proprietary panel of over 50,000 LGBTQ+ identified adults, to ensure a diverse set of respondents, with supplemental recruitment conducted through HRCF networks for hard-to-reach populations.

I don't believe for a second that they've accurately reflected the LGBT populace in America, whatever their claims to the contrary. But even if they have, it doesn't really matter. Not when we're talking about such a small percentage of the overall population. :marseychartpie:

Recently, LGBTQ+ consumers have been estimated to command more than $1.4 trillion in spending power. That number seems only poised to grow in the future as younger generations continue to overwhelmingly identify with the LGBTQ+ community.

It's nice to say "102% of Zoomers identify as LGBTQIA+", but it's bullshit, and everyone knows it. Losing 3.2% (80% of ~4%, the actual percentage of people that are gay or bi) of the total population as potential customers is—or at least, ought be—meaningless to a business if it allows them to capture more than that from the remaining 96%. :marseychudchartuptrend:

Plus, let's be real. A huge percentage of the people that say they'll boycott for shit like this have eaten Chick-fil-A at some point within the past month. So really, the businesses are risking what, 2% of the population? Maybe less? They'd be crazy to care. :marseycapitalistmanlet:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's a very important point on top of all the other fallacies in the article. These are the percentages of respondents who said they'd boycott, encourage others to boycott, etc. There's nothing to say that they do, or pointing out they likely have a very different view of boycotting beer vs. Apple, for example.

This is a poll about potential future virtuous behaviour, and feeling frowny about corporations. It means nothing, every step of the way.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>HRC foundation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Rights_Campaign

The Human Rights Campaign (HRC) is an American LGBTQ advocacy group. It is the largest LGBTQ political lobbying organization within the United States.[2] Based in Washington, D.C., the organization focuses on protecting and expanding rights for LGBTQ individuals, including advocating for same-s*x marriage, anti-discrimination and hate crimes legislation, and HIV/AIDS advocacy.

so theyre lobbyists and bugchasers. No reason to suspect bias there

!slots202

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Breaking: Pork Council study finds that 90% of Americans support porkin it up, demand subsidies to make porkin easier and cheaper!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://media.tenor.com/wpVzBHkfPhMAAAAx/joe-manchin-west-virginia.webp

!slots100

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17265268586339738.webp

!slots2000

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More trustworthy than when I thought it was Hillary Clinton foundation lmfaooo

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://media.tenor.com/o0S5UqXS_Y8AAAAx/hillary-clinton-laughing.webp

!slots303

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oh no fellow !chuds whatever will we do? If Ford doesn't offer a pride flag paint livery-at 200% markup-to all their :marseytrain: supporters and make commercials with cute twinks taking road trips with their stolen buggery victims.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Thoughts, b-word? There's no study. It's a fricking survey. By an org that benefits from the fricking survey having a fricking certain result.

Anyway it presents a fricking false dichotomy as companies don't need to ditch queer consumers OR conservative consumers. They can just SELL THE fricking PRODUCT without pandering to either and be successful.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The data comes from the HRC Foundation's

In the trash it goes.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Pro LGBTQIABC+ foundation partnered with pro LGBTQIABC+ research firm and discovered not being pro LGBTQIABC+ is bad.

..

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"I made it up"

:#marseysurejan:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

yes snappy the are the ones with mpox

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

These people also all said they'd move to Canada if Trump won in 2016

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I thought they and their allies were a minority :marseygigathonk:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Now playing: Level Complete - Diddy (DKC2).mp3

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.