!chuds thoughts?
A growing number of companies have been folding to right wing boycotts and ditching DEI programs, particularly those that support LGBTQ+ employees. But by appeasing a vocal fringe, those companies are poised to lose significant revenue from the communities they've abandoned, a new study suggests.
The data comes from the HRC Foundation's 2024 LGBTQ+ Climate Survey, conducted in partnership with LGBTQ+ research firm Community Marketing & Insights. Between August 8 and 18, nearly 2,500 LGBTQ+ adults completed the survey, and the results detail stark implications for corporations who have turned their back on DEI.
80% respondents said they would boycott a company that rolled back DEI programs, and over half would urge others to boycott, including making negative reviews and social media posts. Overall, 75% said they would look negatively on said companies.
For LGBTQ+ employees, 19% said they would quit or start looking for a new job in the event their company dropped DEI initiatives. 72% said they would feel less accepted at work and one-third said their productivity would suffer.
Recently, LGBTQ+ consumers have been estimated to command more than $1.4 trillion in spending power. That number seems only poised to grow in the future as younger generations continue to overwhelmingly identify with the LGBTQ+ community.
And LGBTQ+ consumers care about where they are spending their money, taking note of signals of support. 87% of survey respondents said that sponsoring a Pride event indicates support. 93% agreed that donating to LGBTQ+ causes earning a 100% score on the HRC's Consumer Equality Index, which rates corporations for LGBTQ+ inclusive policies, indicates some support. As part of cutting DEI programs, many corporations have opted out of the HRC's CEI.
Thus far, the corporations that have rolled back DEI programs include Molson--Coors, Harley Davidson, Lowe's, Ford, Tractor Supply and Jack Daniel's. The recent backlash has come at the behest of right wing provocateur Robby Starbuck, who targets companies with DEI programs and incites followers to boycott.
"The LGBTQ+ community is an economic powerhouse, and we want to work for and support companies who support us," Orlando Gonzales, HRC Senior Vice President, Programs, Research, and Training summed up.
"Attacks on DEI initiatives are shortsighted and make our workplaces less safe and less inclusive for hard-working Americans of all demographics and backgrounds. This new data confirms that companies like Molson Coors, Ford, and others that abandon their values and backtrack from commitments to diversity, equity, and inclusion risk losing both top employee talent and consumer dollars."
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The number surveyed is fine, provided the rest of their methodology doesn't have any issues. The selection bias, on the other hand, is almost certainly enormous.![:marseynatesilver: :marseynatesilver:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseynatesilver.webp)
I don't believe for a second that they've accurately reflected the LGBT populace in America, whatever their claims to the contrary. But even if they have, it doesn't really matter. Not when we're talking about such a small percentage of the overall population.![:marseychartpie: :marseychartpie:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseychartpie.webp)
It's nice to say "102% of Zoomers identify as LGBTQIA+", but it's bullshit, and everyone knows it. Losing 3.2% (80% of ~4%, the actual percentage of people that are gay or bi) of the total population as potential customers is—or at least, ought be—meaningless to a business if it allows them to capture more than that from the remaining 96%.![:marseychudchartuptrend: :marseychudchartuptrend:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseychudchartuptrend.webp)
Plus, let's be real. A huge percentage of the people that say they'll boycott for shit like this have eaten Chick-fil-A at some point within the past month. So really, the businesses are risking what, 2% of the population? Maybe less? They'd be crazy to care.![:marseycapitalistmanlet: :marseycapitalistmanlet:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseycapitalistmanlet.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's a very important point on top of all the other fallacies in the article. These are the percentages of respondents who said they'd boycott, encourage others to boycott, etc. There's nothing to say that they do, or pointing out they likely have a very different view of boycotting beer vs. Apple, for example.
This is a poll about potential future virtuous behaviour, and feeling frowny about corporations. It means nothing, every step of the way.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Rights_Campaign
so theyre lobbyists and bugchasers. No reason to suspect bias there
!slots202
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Breaking: Pork Council study finds that 90% of Americans support porkin it up, demand subsidies to make porkin easier and cheaper!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!slots100
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!slots2000
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More trustworthy than when I thought it was Hillary Clinton foundation lmfaooo
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!slots303
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context