https://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/openforum/article/Supreme-Court-s-Roe-ruling-would-trample-the-17155205.php
You know what that means.
Top Poster of the Day:
Thirtythirst4sissies
Current Registered Users: 28,723
Welcome to the Marsey News Network, the official news hole of rdrama! This is where you post anything that happened on the news. Politics, general news, good news, any new in any topic that doesn't have it's own hole from any source is welcome! However, if you post an unreliable source, it may be flaired appropriately. Wingcucks welcome and slapfights encouraged!
Rules:
1. Follow sitewide rules
2. Post News
3. Have Fun! Don't be boring.
4. No chudrama-tier content. Rightoid news sources are allowed, but anything that belongs in chudrama or could get the site deplatformed will be moved to chudrama.
5. @DarkDeity and
@Spiderman has the right to post whatever news they want in this hole
6. Be nice.
/h/mnn SETTINGS /h/mnn LOG /h/mnn MODS /h/mnn EXILEES /h/mnn FOLLOWERS /h/mnn BLOCKERS
Current software version: c889144
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's a bullshit argument because Judaism argues that the life of the pregnant woman is more valuable than the life of the fetus if the fetus' birth will kill the mother. The reasoning is the mother can birth again but if she dies during childbirth then society loses a babymaker. I don't see any state forcing a woman to give birth if that means the woman will die from labor. Also, this was when women were giving birth in 110 degrees heat n the family's straw bed with a midwife nearby. Pregnancy-related deaths have gone down significantly with modern medicine.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Furthermore, (((Philo of Alexandria))), one of the most important Jewish philosophers of all time AND a contemporary of (((Yeshua Moschiach))) advocated the death penalty for those who carried out abortions.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
becoming so anti-Semitic you read obscure Jewish philosophy texts is a good bit.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's also a bullshit argument because Employment Division v. Smith states that you can ban actions that happen to be religious practices so long as you are not specifically targeting that religion.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context