https://x.com/IAPolls2022/status/1752775226612474145
🇺🇲 2024 GE: @QuinnipiacPoll (15)
— InteractivePolls (@IAPolls2022) January 31, 2024
Nov. 2023
(R) Trump: 48% (+2)
(D) Biden: 46%
.
Dec. 2023
(D) Biden: 47% (+1)
(R) Trump: 46%
.
Jan. 2024
(D) Biden: 50% (+6)
(R) Trump: 44% https://t.co/o5quaNGa46 pic.twitter.com/6jP0KUpUp8
!chuds in shambles
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Realclearpolitics has Trump winning +2.5. it aggregates polls by accuracies and lean
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I only trust analysis from Nate Silver because he makes wing cucks on both sides seethe no matter what he says.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
God I love Nate Silver
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Wrong, Nate silver is the goat because he's hideous, there's a correlation between your ability to do math and how butt ugly.you are
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
If you ignore how wrong he was about 2016.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes, you are one of the people seething, which I enjoy.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Didn't he give Trump the highest chance of winning among the major aggregators?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes the 538 final had Trump at 28.6%. To be fair most people are r-slurred when it comes to numbers and statistics though.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Remember when all the 2016 polls had Clinton winning by a landslide?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You know Clinton was up like 2% in the polls in 2016, which is the standard historical margin of error for polling, right?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Ps do feel at all silly for being completely wrong about Ukraine-Russia? You have to stop believing the tv bro
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
She did, just not the electoral college
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context