Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wasn't the original criticism of the phrase that it was (supposedly) used to defend male feminists and not actual children being annoying? In this context, it seems to be very much the correct argument. :marseybeanquestion:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They just pretended it was referring to r*pe so they could play the victim and act smarter than you for understanding the true meaning of the term.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.