1. No metadrama except in arbitrary circumstances.
2. Don't post in bad faith!
3. Try to be thought provoking, not provoking.
No email address required.
Wasn't the original criticism of the phrase that it was (supposedly) used to defend male feminists and not actual children being annoying? In this context, it seems to be very much the correct argument.
They just pretended it was referring to r*pe so they could play the victim and act smarter than you for understanding the true meaning of the term.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Wasn't the original criticism of the phrase that it was (supposedly) used to defend male feminists and not actual children being annoying? In this context, it seems to be very much the correct argument.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They just pretended it was referring to r*pe so they could play the victim and act smarter than you for understanding the true meaning of the term.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context