Front Page: Nuclear
proliferation is 
a good thing, chud! 
https://old.reddit.com/r/PrepperIntel/comments/1j2hgt3/trump_aiming_to_denuclearize_the_us_as_russia_is/
Drumpf saying that he wants to work with China and Russia so that all their countries can reduce their nuclear stockpiles to safer and cheaper to maintain levels actually means that Drumpf will get rid of all our nukes while Russia and China get double and then Drumpfnis gonna take ur guns!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Nuke the East
!friendsofkong
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Not sure why people act like this is unprecedented. There have been multiple nuclear treaties signed between the US and Russia or the US and China over the past several decades.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
people are full on r-slurred about nuclear weapons. listening to people try to discuss the topic is like watching a dog try to put on pants
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
no im smart. shut up loser.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
maybe but i bet you're not smart enough to give me 1k dc
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Do you think Russia or China actually follow through with any of their agreements?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Rightoids spent 10 years whining about trusting Iran.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
And they turned out to be completely right
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
the US Russia and China were able to collectively reduce their stockpiles before under the START treaty in 1991 Russia and US each reduced their stockpiles by about 80%
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah none of those three are ever going to give up ALL of their nuclear arms, we'll pretty much always keep enough around to obliterate all of our enemies.
But the stockpiles during the cold war were absurd overkill lmao.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
fr, butt they can all reduce those numbers mitually save money while maintaining armageddon levels
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
they're already at the lowest possible levels lmao.
russia, china, US only have enough nukes for primarily military targets at this point.
any excess is there to make up for nuclear weapon loss during the opening exchange.
most nukes are devoted to reducing the number of nukes your enemy has.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_with_nuclear_weapons
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Director of Diversity and InclusionExecutive BWC 1mo ago #7880303 spent 0 currency on pingsDarn, this really puts the whole don't antagonize Russia too much or nuclear holocaust thing in a whole new light. Also, I'm not trusting a word Russia says, we shouldn't give up shit. Plus if we're creating enemies left and right, now is not the time to disarm.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
look at the deployed number lil bro.
these are also much smaller nukes than you would think.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!ifrickinglovescience !friendsofpizzashill
@ACA what do nukes being "deployed" means?, does this means that technically speaking, Israel, India, Pakistan, and North Korea do not actually have nukes and all of their stockpile is just for peepee measuring and scaring off their enemies?, for example, if India and Pakistan wanted to nuke each other, they would take months to "deploy" their nukes or something? 
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
those countries have "deployed" nukes.
How stockpiles work is the reserve is meant to replace losses from the opening exchange. this is also why both the US and soviet union had like 70k nukes during the cold war, it was assumed most of these would be lost in an opening exchange.
seriously, we dont have enough nukes to just start hitting cities anymore, they're pretty much all for military targets, a decent number of them are tactical nukes as well.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Deploy just means store them in the area where they would be used. Like, when you deploy troops, you fly them to where the action is, but they might not be actually fighting.
So when you deploy nukes, you take them out of a long term storage facility and transfer them to where the submarines or planes that will use them are located.
In this example India would just have a bunch of nukes, but they wouldn't be stored in a war-ready location or condition.
Think of it as the difference between having a sword on your waist or having your hand on the hilt ready to pull it out.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
!glowies !fedposters
A reason for excess nukes is for maintenance and logistics and minimum storage/deployment numbers.
Example: They need to keep X number of warheads on Y number of missiles on Z number of submarines and W number of warheads in storage facilities.
However you need to maintain missiles periodically, and removing them from either the submarine or storage puts you below the amount you have to keep at any location, so you build enough to also keep in transition.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's not clear that any of Russia's high yield warheads are actually functional, at least too even a fraction of their rated yield.
Due too test ban treaties all high yield warheads in service or storage were designed and built using modeling too simulate detonation and non-nuclear detonations too ensure nuclear detonations actually work as expected. It's not clear that Russia retained the skills or institutional knowledge with the chaos after the fall of the Soviet Union too do this. Having nukes is much easier then having high yield nukes that you can build a reasonable deterrence around.
A 50kt yield is still dangerous but it's much less too worry about than 500kt.
RSM56 is the only nuclear equiped ICBM that it's clear actually works too, it's not at all clear Russia are able too deliver a nuke from Russia too any major population centers in the US, other than Alaska and no one gives a shit about Alaska, from their land based systems.
@fedposter strongly believe the US chose too fall below SSBN parity with Russia and have delayed replacing land based ICBMs because this is known. It's likely China has more nuclear teeth than Russia do at this point.
@fedposter suck Jewish peepee.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The US is in the same boat as far as lost talent and lack of testing. We have this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockpile_stewardship
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
That's nice sweaty. Why don't you have a seat in the time out corner with Pizzashill until you calm down, then you can have your Capri Sun.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Uh I'd have thought China would have much more and France much less.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
China's is the cheapest deterrence possible, France was planning on nuking Germany as a warning shot if the Soviets ever rolled towards the Rhine
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's just good policy in general.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
they're* lol
Also the lowest possible levels would be zero. Like fr did you even read what u typed when you boofed that?
!slots123
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
the lowest level possible means the lowest level in reality, lmao, not fantasy world drivel about 0. why would russia ever go to 0 nukes when they have a much weaker conventional military?
why would any country?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
in reality the world did jist fine with zero nukes before the 1940s.
!slotsmb123
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
but we didn't really? we had multiple insane wars in which millions and millions of people died and the world economic order was shattered?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!slotsmb1234
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!slots123
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Is there any legitimate Trump ties to Russia or are redditors still coasting on the russian collusion hoax?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The logic is this:
They literally cannot comprehend that there are actions which might be beneficial to both Russia and the US.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
nothing the guy has done is beneficial to america lmao.
this is a russian/chinese wet dream.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's reddit. They don't even read the articles people link to. They'll react to a rando posting a screenshot of a headline with no evidence an article even exists at all.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The two main things were unsubstantiated rumors found in oppo research (Steele dossier) and DJT jr met with a Russian lawyer who said they had dirt on Hillary (im 2016). DJT jr said they had nothing were jerking him around and redditors think that was proof of a grand conspiracy
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Democrats were the real war mongers all along?!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
being a war monger is when you dont bend over for your enemies
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Please, Dems have bent over for Israel since the beginning.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
first he came for our usaids, then he came for our trains, now he comes for our nukes, when will the madness stop???
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Here I was thinking we might finally finish designing a new warhead for the first time since the 90s
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
These people had literal r-slur brain.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
This is an old announcement
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
i know, butt the thread/seethe about it is fresh
!slots119
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
"The global importance of the Middle East is that it keeps the Far East and the Near East from encroaching on each other."
Snapshots:
https://old.reddit.com/r/PrepperIntel/comments/1j2hgt3/trump_aiming_to_denuclearize_the_us_as_russia_is/:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context