California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a pioneer for LGBTQ+ rights who decades ago upset leaders in his own party when he defied state law and issued marriage licenses to same-s*x couples, suggested Democrats were in the wrong in allowing transgender athletes to participate in female college and youth sports.
"I think it's an issue of fairness, I completely agree with you on that. It is an issue of fairness --- it's deeply unfair," Newsom said in his debut podcast episode of "This is Gavin Newsom." "I am not wrestling with the fairness issue. I totally agree with you."
Newsom's comments on the issue roiling political debates nationwide came in a conversation with influential MAGA-world figure Charlie Kirk, the campus culture warrior who leads the organization Turning Point USA and is a close ally of President Donald Trump and his son, Donald Trump Jr.
Newsom also agreed that the most politically destructive attack ads from Trump's campaign featured Kamala Harris' support for providing taxpayer-funded gender transition-related medical care for detained immigrants and federal prisoners.
"She didn't even react to it, which was even more devastating," Newsom said, suggesting upward of 90 percent of Americans disagreed with Harris' position. "Then you had the video [of Harris] as a validator. Brutal," Newsom added. "It was a great ad."
Kirk challenged Newsom, a likely 2028 presidential hopeful, to speak out against AB Hernandez, a transgender high school track star from California whose triple jump event in the women's competition is drawing fierce backlash from the right. Newsom said he has four children of his own --- including two daughters --- and noted that both he and his wife participated in college-level sports, she in soccer and he in baseball.
"I revere sports, so the issue of fairness is completely legit," Newsom said. "And I saw that --- the last couple years, boy did I [see] how you guys were able to weaponize that issue at another level."
Kirk challenged Newsom over his use of the word "weaponize," and Newsom replaced it with "highlight."
POLITICO last month was first to report Newsom's new podcast, with the Democratic governor saying he drew inspiration from the likes of HBO provocateur Bill Maher, who regularly finds common ground with conservative adversaries while taking frequent aim at Democratic dogma, including on youth trans issues.
Newsom's interview with Kirk was friendly, sometimes exceedingly so. He mentioned the influence Kirk and other MAGA-world figures have had on his 13-year-old son, distanced himself from the use of pronouns and the gender-neutral term "Latinx," called police defunding "lunacy," denounced "cancel culture" and agreed that there had been some internal issues in the leadership of the Black Lives Matter organization.
Indeed, the 75-minute interview presented Newsom in the opposite light than he appeared in over recent years when stumping as a surrogate for former President Joe Biden and Harris and sparring with ideological foes like Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Fox News' Sean Hannity.
Newsom in the podcast also was self-deprecating --- joking that he only eats meals (including grabbing take-out) at the famed three-Michelin star French Laundry where he got considerable heat for attending a friends' party during Covid lockdowns and conceding that he should have been celebrating at the everyman eatery Applebee's.
On youth trans sports Kirk drew out a longer response.
There are relatively few transgender athletes competing at the collegiate level. But Newsom said it was "easy to call out" the unfairness, echoing concerns raised by Republicans in Washington and across the country who argue that banning trans women and girls from participating in school athletic competitions designated for female athletes would ensure fairness.
While Newsom has at times touched on his own concerns about the issue, particularly around youth sports, the remarks on his eponymous new podcast are his most expansive on the topic. He went on to express sympathy for trans people, noting "these poor people" have higher rates of suicide and depression and saying "the way that people talk down to vulnerable communities is an issue that I have a hard time with, as well."
Yet, Newsom said Kirk was right when he contended that Republicans were capitalizing politically by painting Democrats as out of step with a strong majority of Americans on the issue. Earlier this week, Senate Democrats blocked a GOP-led effort to bar transgender girls from female youth sports.
"I agree with you," Newsom said. "We're getting crushed on it. Crushed. Crushed."
Newsom noted his own leadership on issues of LGBTQ+ rights but he said even some of his friends have privately asked him why he's not been more vocal about trans athletes.
He said the authority for trans K-12 athletes competing in girls' and womens' sports came from a 2014 state law --- signed by then-Gov. Jerry Brown --- that also allowed students who identified as transgender to use school bathrooms "consistent with their gender identity."
Newsom compared his position on trans athletes to conservatives who oppose same-s*x marriage on principle --- saying he values that Kirk and others are not abandoning their opposition now that gay marriages are both legally and socially acceptable by a majority of Americans.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Crushing women in sports is my human right
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
From the last election, it's very likely there are more women who will vote against trains than there are trains whose single issue voting will change who they vote for. I'm looking forward to when they are politically homeless because politicians realise it's a topic that will lose them elections.
The podcast itself sounds interesting, if only because Newsom sounds like he was trying to talk about things in political tactics terms, dissecting what worked and what didn't as a post-mortem, but it was Kirk who was pushing it to be more about where he personally stood.
They just need to take the step after banning trans women in women's sports and accept that means they don't believe, and therefore shouldn't treat, trans women as women on any other issue as well.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They literally just had to do what the gays did and go for moderate respectable "We're people too" policies instead of going for things like this that just piss people off and don't even benefit the majority of them. People are turned off by things that hurttheir kids.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
edit: leave your typo like a cute twink, straggot.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Now they are Ubermenschen.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
!wolfpack
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I need this with sound.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Was there another edit when The dog said the n word or am i imagining that
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Yeah, it was the YFRWK guy going "BIPOC"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
D'aww! Thank u, fren!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
And yet
s insist that they have a right to hurt your kids. They are willing to die on every hill, including the ones that involve them being allowed to groom children.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Well it works for them online when they can have the jannies mop it up
Sounds like it's time to start moderating votes
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It's because of autism. Neurodivergent people are typically black and white thinkers who are stubborn as frick and not prone to pragmatic compromise, and ASD is super prevalent amongst all forms of locomotive-enthusiast.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I mean that's basically the entire foundation of trains in the first place- exploiting people who's brains are still developing and aren't mature enough to diagnose what their real problems are
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Accusing people of grooming children is bullying and bullying is bad.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Accusing people of bullying is bullying and bullying is bad.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
they can't because
erism is inherently r*pey.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
you could unironically say the same thing about gay men
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes but the only people gay men could r*pe are scrotes and scrotes don't matter.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They reproduce by raping little boys though
Oh wait,
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Calling people male feminists is bullying and bullying is bad.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
There's an entire laundry list of their frickups
At least the gays knew when to quit while they were ahead (mostly) pride month is just blatant arrogance and flaunting now but even so they knew better than to even go near the same issues and topics the
s have.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There really are kids who are "trans", it's not just something that liberal Munchausen moms concoct. From the time my brother was a toddler, he talked about how he was really a girl. Thankfully this was the 90s and he just grew up to be gay.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
So your example basically is not an example of a real trans kid?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
He was someone who would totally be labeled as a trans kid today, then potentially put on puberty blockers and then hormones, as literally 98% of kids put on blockers are.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Which is why
ing out kids is homophobic.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Yea but to trains sucking peepee in public is their thing they want to push for because it lets them be gawked and sneered at forever
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
it isnt a big deal, but it is at the same time...the dems pushing this dont realize that most see it as weird men...saying that man is a woman is a huge lie, and if they will fight for that lie to the death...what else are they lying about...its the stupidest hill to fricking die on for the dems...
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
if you don't give gold medals to trans women for crushing female women's skulls, you're literally committing trans genocide.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
lol i hope that person enjoys president vance, i know i will
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
/u/whycarbon I wouldn't vote for a transphobe like Gavin Newsom too because trans women are freaking wholesome and valid and totally same as females and should be allowed to participate in all female sports but can you please make an account here to help affirm the feelings of
@CREAMY_DOG_ORGASM here? I'm sure he's sorely disappointed by Gavin and would love to seek some solace in someone as trans positive as you!!
oh I just saw that you're trans which makes it even better because
@CREAMY_DOG_ORGASM is infatuated with trans folx!!! 
chaserstrans affirming users likeJump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Me when thinking about valid /u/whycarbon is
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Is this queen even an athlete?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
if you are trans this position is the only rational one, shit the window as far left as possible so when the tide swings back, its "dems are the real transphobes"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
/u/whycarbon heres an idea: if the other candidate is running on "take away all your rights", maybe vote for the "only take away some of your rights" candidate?
Or better yet to be as charitable as possible: isnt it better to vote to have your rights taken away than let the guy win who's running on taking your rights away and then ahooting you in the face?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context