- whyareyou : False title! This is personal drama with a happy ending
- 12
- 21
The brakes on my bike were fricked and I feared I might have to wrote it off but I was able to fix it after all.
Currently biking a coastal trail in the middle of nowhere so I was quite freaked about having my brakes not working as of a sudden.
It's all good now
The beach is quite lovely today
END OF BLOGPOST
- 36
- 28
Back in day, travellers/explorers would draw what they saw. This is where many sea monster stories come from ie. tentacled and alienesque appendages emerging from the water - giving belief to something more sinister lurking beneath....however, many cases it was just whale dicks. pic.twitter.com/6ZH1nJZvB1
— Prof. Michael Sweet 🪸 (@DiseaseMatters) April 8, 2022
- 42
- 79
The majority of human beings cannot fully comprehend a statement that has a conditional as a key part of its meaning.
— Yishan (@yishan) May 29, 2023
This sounds incredible to those who can, but I'm pretty sure it's true.
Not drama, but want to showcase how absolutely r-slurred some people are getting.
Here's his example of "people unable to understand conditionals"
Here's an example of how the conversation goes, and how this fact remains hidden:
A: "If I were going to Paris, where would be the best place to get a baguette?"
B: "Oh! You're going to Paris?"
A: "No, I'm just saying, where's the best place in Paris to get a baguette?"
B: "Oh yeah, sure, you want to go to.... etc"
This is not them misunderstanding the question. This is people reading into the question, seeking context in to why he is asking such a thing if he is not going.
This user is the Dunning Krueger version of the breakfast question. He's on the opposite side of the problem than he thinks he is.
Anyways many are agreeing with him and this example in the replies and quotes. Remember that these are the people you argue with online! They aren't worth your time kings!
- 17
- 19
somebody confirm
- 4
- 11
please rate my neiman marcus x abercrombie Memorial Day design contest submission