Footballer cleared of r*pe for the second time, feminists in a shambles - HE CAN'T KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH THIS

https://twitter.com/jessx173/status/1679858853482037248

Context: Man City footballer Benjamin Mendy was found not guilty for raping 5 women back in January, with that jury failing to reach a verdict on two additional charges. Today, a new jury has cleared him of those as well.

Linked tweet:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16893584826256168.webp

Additional tweets:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16893584827186568.webp

https://twitter.com/antifamouss/status/1679863768505892871

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16893584828017633.webp

https://twitter.com/ajulestale/status/1679861980528558082

Reddit discussions:

/r/unitedkingdom

/r/soccer

/r/MFCC


Addendum:

/u/jackedtradie has been making troll comments on /r/uk since forever and he gets seething replies every time :marseykneel:

This is the problem with innocent until proven guilty. Men like this get away with whatever they want.

134
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

here’s a reminder that being found not guilty doesn’t mean he’s innocent.

Foid logic

:#marseyfoidretard:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Found not guilty of r*pe/SA, one of the hardest crimes to gather enough evidence to convict. Foidbrain is right once or twice a month.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You can prove two people fricked pretty easily, but when his side is "we had a couple of drinks, went back to hers and had s*x" and hers is "we had a couple of drinks, went back to mine and he r*ped me" there's not really anything to go on :marseyshrug: anecdotal evidence from a couple of cops I know is that 95% of the r*pe reports they get the foid essentially wants a piece of paper saying she was r*ped and therefore totally didn't cheat :marseywomanmoment2: they much prefer dealing with the other 5% where there's a chance of someone actually getting sent down :marseycoomer3:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

is ghost :marseyghostangry: pinging r*pe?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No, it's worse because it happens to me

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

As if I wouldn't immediately dump a b-word for getting r*ped lmao

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Always remember this, fellows: if you're dating a b-word and she says she got r*ped but she doesn't want to file charges against her male feminist, she didn't really get r*ped.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#mysides:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If you are alone with a man voluntarily it’s never r*pe

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If seven :marsey7o7: women :marseydarkfoidretard: couldn't provide any evidence, it's likely it didn't happen :marseyvenn6:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They could have had tons of evidence, jury can still refuse to convict for any number of reasons. This is the UK so it could be a 100% muslim jury that doesnt believe you can r*pe non-muslim foids. Or a jury of manchester fans. Or a jury of the smartest bongs who couldn't comprehend the evidence.

People get not guilty verdicts when they did it, all the time.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

also a lot of evidence isnt admissable in couet for various reasons. Like her tears, the jury almost never gets to see a victims tears

https://media.giphy.com/media/LUm1TO9b00cKTVUbdK/giphy.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

But in this specific case, it’s pretty clear he didn’t r*pe anyone.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Report within a day or is it two and they can get his semen, if there's signs of trauma that's enough I think for conviction. So just go to a gynecologist in two days. If foids can't even do that after being r*ped maybe they want the male feminist to go free.

:marseyshrug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Most of the time the accused aren’t denying s*x happened so semen is useless. Most r*pe isn’t as physically traumatic as you’d think. The issue with convicting r*pe is that there’s rarely any witnesses, that’s why they build these cases with multiple women. it’s unfair for men because they can rarely defend themselves and unfair for women since it’s difficult to prove it happened. What you end up with is a bunch of foids saying BELIEVE ALL WOMEN, and dramatards saying ALL FOIDS ARE LIARS.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

ALL FOIDS ARE LIARS.

In this case, the first trial proved they were liars though. There are recordings of the s*x itself, decent evidence of the foids colluding and one of the women went back the day after the "r*pe" and was seen smiling and laughing. It's the second trial you could bring this up for.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It doesn't matter. Truth is the first victim of ideology. Mendy is a male feminist because women want him to be a male feminist and men are too cowardly to disagree with them. That's the quality of our society nowadays.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Our society really ought to start shooting people who think this way. Direction-brain is a serious problem with human society and all the "people" who suffer from this mental illness need to learn how to do better

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why do you think the NPC meme sparked such a furore amongst the masses when it was popularised? That's because a large majority of the human population are NPCs when it comes to political ideology - like sheep, they unthinkingly follow the shepherd. Truly independent thinkers are as rare as black sand on a beach.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Of course, narcissists always become infuriated when you point out their narcissism.

On a related note, Trump for prison

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Of course, narcissists always become infuriated when you point out their narcissism.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

If s*x was forced then shouldn't there be injuries though? :marseyconfused: Apparently that's not needed legally but is it biologically sound that s*x without consent wouldn't cause injuries? I thought without lubrication gussy can't handle peepees?

I'm not really including drunk r*pe etc here, legally the definition is too loose to be useful.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:smh: Obviously most bonus hole havers don't fight back. And they probably often do get wet while r*ped because :marseykink:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's Fight, Flight, Freeze, Fawn type shit

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I know 4 people who were sexually assaulted and 2 who were falsely accused of sexual assault

so it's 33% that are lying, not 100%

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is why I think :marseybigbussyhunterlove: that prosecuting 20 year old r*pe cases :marseymanysuchcases: or s*x assault claims is just stupid. There :marseycheerup: is almost never :marseyitsover: any evidence aside from what someone recalls, which is just as good as making it up.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

within a day or is it two and they can get his semen

This is why I never go raw in foids. They will never steal my seed.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://media.giphy.com/media/GpA3niErkRyy4/giphy.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Foids do this weird shit when someone does something bad to them they'd rather run away and forget instead of punishing the offender and / or warning potential future victims. :marseyshrug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Facts

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Between military service and college - out of the nine times I have seen women accuse a dude of r*pe, eight of them were completely made up either as revenge or to save face.

One of those incidents was a gangbang that was videotaped, including a part where she called one of the dudes a kitty because he wouldn't piss on her.

Another one is now a prominent activist about "MST - Military Sexual Trauma", and has a whole business designed to leach money out of the DOD to lecture about it. The actual story, and why the dude didn't even see a court room, was because about 30 of us were there and we watched this chick molest this dude for about an hour before he finally gave in and fricked her. She also approached the dude about a relationship, which he declined, and then she filed charges.

WOMEN LIE ABOUT R*PE.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

people have trouble combining a couple things in their head that are all true:

  • only 1 in 10 r*pes is reported

  • only 1 in 2 r*pe cases that make it to court end in a conviction

  • only 1 in 3 r*pe accusations isn't bullshit

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Both MRAs and radfems are right in this case.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is entirely women's fault. Cameras exist

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Found not guilty of r*pe/SA, one of the hardest crimes to gather enough evidence to convict.

Yet the Crown Court found enough evidence to take it to trial and shamefully lost, not once, but in two separate trials. Stop being an r-slur and believing fake feminist stats about false r*pe accusations, they are far more common than the matriarchy will have you believe, especially if you frick hundreds of escorts and whores like Mendy.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How is foidbrain right here? You're saying we should change our standard to "guilty until proven innocent?"

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

For once the Twitter foids are right. Not guilty does not mean "the jury positively found that he didn't do it". It means "the prosecution failed to discharge their burden of showing beyond any reasonable doubt that he did do it".

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yes, innocent.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Innocent until proven guilty is such an outdated concept, haven't you heard of #BelieveWomen?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No, not guilty. L2read

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Meaning 'innocent' in every way that matters.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If a jury finds you not guilty, you are innocent :marseyangel3: of the charges against you.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No, you fricking r-slur, this is not a difficult concept. The jury acquits you or dismisses charges. It does not find you innocent. The charges are gone on a not guilty verdict, and that is all. At no point are you said to be innocent of the charges. The state failed to prove them, you weren't found innocent

:marseyreading::marseygigaretard:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If the state :marseycoonass: has not sufficient evidence to convict, then by that definition :marseyremastered: you are innocent. That's why it is the 'Presumption of Innocence' not the 'presumption that you will be acquitted because the jury won't find you guilty :marseyjudge: beyond :marseynietzscheretard: a reasonable doubt'

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>then by that definition you are innocent.

Wrong

>That's why it is the (r-slurred explanation)

Wrong

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://media.giphy.com/media/kRXnZwKrPTwVq/giphy.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

You're technically right. It's similar to testing a hypothesis. Your results either reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis. It "cannot" confirm the hypothesis; otherwise, we might quickly find ourselves in the realm of sophistry.

@decam, this dichotomy exists to prevent people from deceiving themselves. "A and not-A" exists, but "not-A" can be more than one thing (if that helps).

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Funny how feminists have now decided to twist the common definition of innocence the second it became inconvenient for them.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yes but in this particular case, if you look at the evidence, it’s obvious he didn’t r*pe anyone.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Just like OJ was innocent right?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

OJ was innocent, sweaty :marseyworried:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

His son did it. All OJ was innocent of us being the only black father to back up his son.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I actually :marseyakshually: had only heard :marseyjacksparrow: of that theory :marseyhorseshoe: like 5 years ago and it made sooo much sense.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The glove didn't fit, r-slur.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ah, yes. The one black dude that ever got away with it in the entirety of US history.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyagreesuperspeed::#marseyagreesuperspeed:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He IS innocent, chud!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think this is more leftie logic

Here in Brazil we have ''being found guilty does not mean he's not innocent''

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They tried to Emmet Till him and he dodged the noose, shows that Black Lives Matter and yts can't just kill any black man they want anymore.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

being found not guilty doesn't mean he's innocent! also, being accused of something DOES mean he's guilty!!!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why do women still act surprised at the fact that men hate them, when they constantly pull stuff like this :marseyhatium:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Babe turn the hate down a bit it's Friday lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Least Incel dramatard

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He was a renowned shagger, a rich footballer who was fond of throwing house parties full of attractive young women.

I haven't followed the case so I don't know what the allegations were, but why would you go to his house if you weren't expecting to have s*x with him?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The first group of girls were all part of an escort agency that were hired to frick the football players during some party at a mansion. They were all in a groupchat and one of the "victims" bragged about having s*x with another player. This girl is a "model" and I feel pretty confident that I know what that really means.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

can we start tweeting this at random minorities that get cleared of stuff=?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You'd think with how often women lie and get caught that they'd be used to it by now but no, they still shriek like harpies each time like it's the first.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Because their are no consequences for lying

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's way past time to change that

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"Guilty until proven innocent and even then still guilty" is such a weird zoomer mindset that I don't understand

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's just an extension of being completely, totally, and utterly incapable of taking personal responsibility for your actions.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Should we abolish the presumption of innocence or just ignore women's complaints for all time? This is a tough one brozzers

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyagreefast:

Both

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That why if I hook up with a new woman I always hit record on my phone and ask her if she’s sure, I also tell her that it’s cool to wait if she doesn’t feel comfortable and that I’ll still talk to her if she says no.

Kinda neurodivergent and mood killing? Absolutely, every chick has been like “of course I want to, you r-slur”. But I’m not taking chances. The second question prevents the Twitter originated accusations of “even though I consented I didn’t consent because of moid mind control”

Then I cancel them on Twitter for saying r-slur.

Sorry, we have to hold everyone accountable!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's neurodivergent and likely wouldn't help, the foid would just she was compelled to say that and the fact that you requested it is proof that you were just trying to cover up impropriety.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wrong. According to Reddit and Twitter, they always believe the man, so I’m safe!

:marseyclueless:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Greenwood.

I KNEEL.

Mendy.

I KNEEL.

!football

Over/under for Partey in you guys' opinions.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How would you have an over/under on a guilty or non-guilty verdict? Have you seriously NEVER had a gambling addiction? smh.

Anyway he’s guilty and should be shot.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Have you seriously NEVER had a gambling addiction?

No, I haven't.

:#marseyitsover:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This reminds me I recently saw a feminist professor :marseyradfem: or something tweeting that the word 'accuser' is anti-victim and needs to stop being used.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!biofoids HOW DOES IT FEEL TO CONSTANTLY LIE ABOUT MEN IN ORDER TO DESTROY THEM?

JUSTICE WAS SERVED, HE DIDNT DO IT, AND ANYWAY YOURE PROBABLY TOO UGLY FOR HIM TO WANT TO FRICK YOU

TRANS LIVES MATTER

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

FRICKS SAKE I CANT EVEN PING FOR THE SAKE OF SNEED FARMING?

@Aevann UNCHUD ME NOW

EDIT: PING CORRECTED. FOIDS EXPLAIN YOURSELF

MY DEMAND REMAINS

TRANS LIVES MATTER

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

theres no !foids ping group, its !biofoids

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Did he not get charged for the edited ping or does it just not show?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Its most likely just poorly implemented and only works when you make the post. Regular pings may be the same way but Im too lazy to check.

Slack has this same bug! You can edit in a ping and act like the person ignored your very important message.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

there was a bug so it didnt ping at all and therefore he didnt get charged

fixed king

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

the group is called biofoids you dumb chud

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's not the name of the ping group :marseyfacepalm:

Chuds frick up, refuse to accept it, and immediately start crying about oppression :marseyeyeroll:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's biofoids

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

@chiobu Greenwood comeback is next.

:werechioback:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16893591515679119.webp :#marseytwerkinitfaster:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Where's this?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Foids and lying about r*pe :marseychonkernoticeme:

Name a better duo

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

As we saw with the Manson :marseycharlesmanson: case, women :marseyuterus: have and do collude with one another to try and convict a man of things he didn't do.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He should get a freebie now.


:#marseyastronaut:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Is he actually raping though?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's sketchy. There were eight cases originally and 6 of those ended up being deemed not guilty because there was good evidence the women were outright lying and colluding. This trial just here were the two that were ruled inconclusive and I guess the jury just didn't see either as clearing the high burden of proof.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Black men are notoriously never prosecuted and beloved by the police, he flexing his black privilege to stay out of prison.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No, the women were all escorts who knew each other and colluded to extort him. 6 charges were dropped by prosecutors and 2 separate juries found him not guilty on the remaining 2. It’s all bullshit and he didn’t do anything.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Clearly these foids lied cause that guy is ugly as frick.

They clearly slept with him cause they were escorts.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Omg, Jess that pfp! Where's your mum, dearie?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Never forget the Seneca Valley High mean girls

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Its funny how like he has to quote not be found guilty like five more times to be innocent but he only has to be found guilty in the court of public opinion once

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yawn, another brigade from Drama? They must be tired of disrespecting the trans community or creeping on underage children if they're willing to shit on a wholesome subreddit that actually does something to help others.

Snapshots:

a new jury has cleared him of those as well:

https://twitter.com/antifamouss/status/1679863768505892871:

https://twitter.com/ajulestale/status/1679861980528558082:

/r/unitedkingdom thread:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.