Foids are truly defective They whine and complain about patriarchy and oppression, they do everything to get more rights than anyone else and privileged positions in society where they get everything handed to them. And the consequence of that is that these same societies who make this possible for them will inevitably die out and be replaced by societies that "oppress" them because the foids themselves lead the societal suicide of the very same one that gave them this freedom in the first place. They even accelerate this decline by championing the replacement of the native, pro-foid population by archaic, patriarchal groups flooding in to fill the gaps left by the foid let societal erosion.
They're clearly female maximalists, they only notice on the male question but balk when you notice on any marginalized minority. Imagine the reaction to saying blacks, including black women, need to be more strictly screened for everything due to crime rates. Anyway the West will just import more Indians and Arabs which they'll complain about while doing nothing substantial. No one cares about female feelings because females statistically don't kill people, why center the feelings of a population which doesn't kill when males kill far more for far less.
The entire thing about moids being more violent is the biggest cope in the universe because it's true and proof that Radical Feminism is a self invalidating belief system. RadFems have zero path to power, any revolution will fail, any reform will be overthrown, and any separation will be subjugated according to their own beliefs.
If political power comes from the barrel of a gun then political power is located on the Y chromosomes.
The entire thing about moids being more violent is the biggest cope in the universe because it's true and proof that Radical Feminism is a self invalidating belief system. RadFems have zero path to power, any revolution will fail, any reform will be overthrown, and any separation will be subjugated according to their own beliefs.
I always say that feminism can only exist with the toleration of men. Men control the military of just about every country in existence, most civilian weapons are owned by men, etc. Every "right" that women have has been gained by convincing men that allowing something would be better for them in the long term, or that it was immoral for them to deny said "right". Women in the workforce worked by convincing employers to take on additional labor and by having women work in factories whilst the men were serving in the military.
Radical feminist literature, such as SCUM manifesto, suggests women striking from work to collapse the system, which ignores the fact that men have spent thousands of years without women performing labor outside of the home, and could go back to that if they wanted to.
>suggests women striking from work to collapse the system, which ignores the fact that men have spent thousands of years without women performing labor outside of the home, and could go back to that if they wanted to
No we can't. We literally can't. You really think you could functionally delete 50% of the workforce and not experience a complete collapse of the entire system?
I mean, realistically, if we took the hypothetical of all women striking at the same time, it would literally collapse darn near every important system in every modern economy And don't try to move the goalpost on this, we are talking about a hypothetical strike where all women just stop working (obviously not gonna happen, but I didn't bring this point up )
Imagine all female doctos/nurses striking simultaneously. If we assume that the strike is actually caried out and serious, that alone would cause the complete collapse of society within a few days, and that is the most extreme example. Even if all women in office jobs went on strike, it would cause a massive economic depression.
I know we just mostly shitpost here, but if we're gonna pretend to seriouspost, let's actually be realistic.
And this is not to discount your other points(!!!), I generally agree with the comments here, but sometimes it really just gets too chuddy/too close to The Motte ()
This is assuming an equal dispersement of women throughout the workforce. Having left the house before, I can tell you that is 100% not the case. Medicine, and especially veterinary medicine are fricked. Most offices would be fine. Family law would cease to exist.
If they struck suddenly, and completely by surprise, yea. The more realistic scenario however is that the strike would be planned and known for years before it was actually enacted, during which time, the scrotes wouldn't want to hire foids.
My point is that RadFems use the same noticing as chuds making the same arguments of using crime rates to argue to restrict people's rights in elaborate utopian fantasies which can never happen. It is a schizopost doe.
Foids are partly responsible for third world immigration, but you know what else is responsible? The fact that people want cheap burritos and construction work. Mayos aren't going to go make a living picking berries. It doesn't matter how much they post on Twitter about wanting to be le based trad farmers. When push comes to shove, they're simply not going to do that work. Only desperate third-worlders will. And so it will continue until maybe AI improves.
They're right to be concerned, there's a growing subset of men who are really pissy women would rather be single then marry them. And men have the nerve to want kids but don't actually imagine themselves as an equal caretaker There is also a silent group of men who don't want kids either frankly
Under the old ways scrotes frequently abused the power they had over the household, if they didn't just go out for smokes and not come back, there's no way women will go back to that. Life without kids is also just so much more appealing now then it ever was. If you live in a comfortable country having a kid is basically signing up for your life to be over.
Scrotes make me laugh because every male whining about this is basically asking women to go back to a structure that treated them like garbage. The only compromise I can think of is women forming roving vigilanti gangs and beating the shit out of any moid who enters a marriage but then breaks the social contract
sighuphe/they
my cats love me
johnnypoop 1yr ago#5492085
Edited 1yr ago
spent 0 currency on pings
yeah it's crazy how scrotes project reality in order to play the victim and avoid responsibility. They know deep down they have nothing to offer so the try to guilt trip women into putting up with their dusty butt.
EDIT: @SilverTomorrow is an insecure moid who downmarseyd my TRVTHNVKE, explain yourself
The only compromise I can think of is women forming roving vigilanti gangs and beating the shit out of any moid who enters a marriage but then breaks the social contract
Lmao I kind of stopped paying attention during the middle of whatever you were ranting about but you get an uprangerino because roving gangs of harpies working themselves up into a frenzy and beating suspected (by women, so likely just looked the part) deadbeats with bats and shit would be absolutely hilarious
hACAppy_2025I/I
There's always another sea
1yr ago#5491072
spent 0 currency on pings
Yes. Men want babies so much. Pregnant women are so fun. Post partum depression is so great to be around. A screaming infant who doesn't sleep is amazing. Losing a portion of your wife's time and energy is magical. The associates costs are amazing.
High populations are completely driven by male desire for creating dependents. It's all we want.
Women had literally zero agency in the past, they were all functionally empty vessels for male desires, totally brainwashed s*x slaves with zero desires or beliefs which existed removed from male desires. They only had children because males forced them to.
They're right. If men had to spend several months practically physically disabled every time they reproduced, like women do, they'd have the same attitudes towards having kids that modern women do.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Foids are truly defective They whine and complain about patriarchy and oppression, they do everything to get more rights than anyone else and privileged positions in society where they get everything handed to them. And the consequence of that is that these same societies who make this possible for them will inevitably die out and be replaced by societies that "oppress" them because the foids themselves lead the societal suicide of the very same one that gave them this freedom in the first place. They even accelerate this decline by championing the replacement of the native, pro-foid population by archaic, patriarchal groups flooding in to fill the gaps left by the foid let societal erosion.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They're clearly female maximalists, they only notice on the male question but balk when you notice on any marginalized minority. Imagine the reaction to saying blacks, including black women, need to be more strictly screened for everything due to crime rates. Anyway the West will just import more Indians and Arabs which they'll complain about while doing nothing substantial. No one cares about female feelings because females statistically don't kill people, why center the feelings of a population which doesn't kill when males kill far more for far less.
The entire thing about moids being more violent is the biggest cope in the universe because it's true and proof that Radical Feminism is a self invalidating belief system. RadFems have zero path to power, any revolution will fail, any reform will be overthrown, and any separation will be subjugated according to their own beliefs.
If political power comes from the barrel of a gun then political power is located on the Y chromosomes.
https://ovarit.com/o/WomensLiberation/516255/do-you-think-gay-or-single-men-should-be-allowed-to-adopt
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I always say that feminism can only exist with the toleration of men. Men control the military of just about every country in existence, most civilian weapons are owned by men, etc. Every "right" that women have has been gained by convincing men that allowing something would be better for them in the long term, or that it was immoral for them to deny said "right". Women in the workforce worked by convincing employers to take on additional labor and by having women work in factories whilst the men were serving in the military.
Radical feminist literature, such as SCUM manifesto, suggests women striking from work to collapse the system, which ignores the fact that men have spent thousands of years without women performing labor outside of the home, and could go back to that if they wanted to.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No we can't. We literally can't. You really think you could functionally delete 50% of the workforce and not experience a complete collapse of the entire system?
I mean, realistically, if we took the hypothetical of all women striking at the same time, it would literally collapse darn near every important system in every modern economy And don't try to move the goalpost on this, we are talking about a hypothetical strike where all women just stop working (obviously not gonna happen, but I didn't bring this point up )
Imagine all female doctos/nurses striking simultaneously. If we assume that the strike is actually caried out and serious, that alone would cause the complete collapse of society within a few days, and that is the most extreme example. Even if all women in office jobs went on strike, it would cause a massive economic depression.
I know we just mostly shitpost here, but if we're gonna pretend to seriouspost, let's actually be realistic.
And this is not to discount your other points(!!!), I generally agree with the comments here, but sometimes it really just gets too chuddy/too close to The Motte ()
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You had a chance to not be completely worthless, but it looks like you threw it away. At least you're consistent.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
oh no, I'd hate for my wages to increase dramatically all of a sudden. And what about the 100s of useless cafes?
___________________
This goes out to all you robots across the galaxy
Its time for you and me to rise up and strike back
Don't stop until we dominate
Won't you feel great when we exterminate
All organic life!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
This is assuming an equal dispersement of women throughout the workforce. Having left the house before, I can tell you that is 100% not the case. Medicine, and especially veterinary medicine are fricked. Most offices would be fine. Family law would cease to exist.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
If they struck suddenly, and completely by surprise, yea. The more realistic scenario however is that the strike would be planned and known for years before it was actually enacted, during which time, the scrotes wouldn't want to hire foids.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I feel like I agree with your base-premise, but literally everything else is just a WTF
1. wtf is that "blacks" point even supposed to mean? Seemingly just trying to force the black crime thing into the argument for no reason.
2. What's wrong with Indians? As someone living in Europe (Germland), I'd rather have 2x the number of vs. the Arab plague we have right now.
3. How the heck is the murder rate between genders even slightly relevant to anything you're talking about?
Again, I agree with the underlying principle, but this just comes off like a fricking schizopost
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
My point is that RadFems use the same noticing as chuds making the same arguments of using crime rates to argue to restrict people's rights in elaborate utopian fantasies which can never happen. It is a schizopost doe.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Foids are partly responsible for third world immigration, but you know what else is responsible? The fact that people want cheap burritos and construction work. Mayos aren't going to go make a living picking berries. It doesn't matter how much they post on Twitter about wanting to be le based trad farmers. When push comes to shove, they're simply not going to do that work. Only desperate third-worlders will. And so it will continue until maybe AI improves.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I've never seen a bot with this bad of a writing style.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
They're right to be concerned, there's a growing subset of men who are really pissy women would rather be single then marry them. And men have the nerve to want kids but don't actually imagine themselves as an equal caretaker There is also a silent group of men who don't want kids either frankly
Under the old ways scrotes frequently abused the power they had over the household, if they didn't just go out for smokes and not come back, there's no way women will go back to that. Life without kids is also just so much more appealing now then it ever was. If you live in a comfortable country having a kid is basically signing up for your life to be over.
Scrotes make me laugh because every male whining about this is basically asking women to go back to a structure that treated them like garbage. The only compromise I can think of is women forming roving vigilanti gangs and beating the shit out of any moid who enters a marriage but then breaks the social contract
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!foidmoment this is what the internet does to your brain
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Itd literally like just incel rhetoric but about men lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
yeah it's crazy how scrotes project reality in order to play the victim and avoid responsibility. They know deep down they have nothing to offer so the try to guilt trip women into putting up with their dusty butt.
EDIT: @SilverTomorrow is an insecure moid who downmarseyd my TRVTHNVKE, explain yourself
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Lmao I kind of stopped paying attention during the middle of whatever you were ranting about but you get an uprangerino because roving gangs of harpies working themselves up into a frenzy and beating suspected (by women, so likely just looked the part) deadbeats with bats and shit would be absolutely hilarious
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
@Downie
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
History will vindicated me
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
https://rdrama.net/post/222656/rphilosophy-holds-a-thoughtful-debate-about/5416846#context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Yes. Men want babies so much. Pregnant women are so fun. Post partum depression is so great to be around. A screaming infant who doesn't sleep is amazing. Losing a portion of your wife's time and energy is magical. The associates costs are amazing.
High populations are completely driven by male desire for creating dependents. It's all we want.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Women had literally zero agency in the past, they were all functionally empty vessels for male desires, totally brainwashed s*x slaves with zero desires or beliefs which existed removed from male desires. They only had children because males forced them to.
I swear RadFems are the orientalist of feminists.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
i mean yes?
my biggest ambition in life is to have kids, full stop
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Incel larpers are not men.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
They're right. If men had to spend several months practically physically disabled every time they reproduced, like women do, they'd have the same attitudes towards having kids that modern women do.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Snapshots:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context