s (men) pooping up the thread will be removed from the entire Lolcow Salon for a month." 
The Kiwicel Man-Hate Megathread. 9k replies since August 2023 
"I've been thinking about this for a while and there's no other place I can express it, so here it is. Tell me what you think of the following idea:
Men are not capable of romantic love. They pretend to love women to get free labor (s*x/mommy bangmaid)
High value men (hot/rich) will use the promise of love to trick as many women as possible into free s*x, if/when a HVM wants children he will enter an established relationship with an attractive younger woman long enough to convince her to birth his children. If he isn't rich, he will likely stay with her long-term to avoid child support/get free domestic labor/boost his image. If he is rich he will not stay long-term, unless to boost his image. Regardless, HVM will not be loyal, and will cheat if they think they can get away with it.
Low value men (average/ugly and not rich) will use "love", or the potential of it, to trick women into relationships so they can get free s*x/mommy bangmaid they wouldn't be able to get otherwise. They deeply resent the fact that they can't have whatever woman they want like the HVM, and will often take it out on women, especially the women they're in relationships with. They would cheat if given the chance, they just usually aren't. This creates the illusion of love and loyalty."
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If I lost my status as a mommy bangmaid, then I'd just be some chick with two and a half jobs and only one cat, coming home to an empty house. That would suck so much!
Life would be so boring without moids, I will not accept life without my moid and his marsey
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!biofoids The Patriarchy got another one
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
He fed me three times yesterday. THREE TIMES THIS MAN FED AND STARBUCKS'D ME!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You are basically his pet at this point
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Holy shit, you're back. It's good to have you around, man.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Why doesn't he contribute to housing costs?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Not necessary at the moment. I prefer knowing the numbers. He contributes to groceries and other necessary purchases
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You know you can share numbers and have a household budget, right?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Look, the fewer pressures on me to join finances, the better. My parents have somewhat separate finances, and regardless of marital status, I'm just better at managing my side of things.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context