"I've been thinking about this for a while and there's no other place I can express it, so here it is. Tell me what you think of the following idea:
Men are not capable of romantic love. They pretend to love women to get free labor (s*x/mommy bangmaid)
High value men (hot/rich) will use the promise of love to trick as many women as possible into free s*x, if/when a HVM wants children he will enter an established relationship with an attractive younger woman long enough to convince her to birth his children. If he isn't rich, he will likely stay with her long-term to avoid child support/get free domestic labor/boost his image. If he is rich he will not stay long-term, unless to boost his image. Regardless, HVM will not be loyal, and will cheat if they think they can get away with it.
Low value men (average/ugly and not rich) will use "love", or the potential of it, to trick women into relationships so they can get free s*x/mommy bangmaid they wouldn't be able to get otherwise. They deeply resent the fact that they can't have whatever woman they want like the HVM, and will often take it out on women, especially the women they're in relationships with. They would cheat if given the chance, they just usually aren't. This creates the illusion of love and loyalty."
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Snapshots:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!chuds
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
ZWABAG HWABAG
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
What is it?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
soyjack party nonsense, they like this girl from a Dutch or Danish comic
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
also dutch isn't a real language
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
@Maya exprain
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context