Unable to load image
/h/toomanyxchromosomes
h8_wh8_w0m3n they/them  4mo ago (reddit.com) 450 thread views #266763

:chudsmug: :stabler: THEY ARE ONLY 17 YEARS 364 DAYS OLD YOU SICK FRICK!!!!

https://old.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/1cku49h/gop_official_argues_in_favor_of_child_marriage/ 




:marseynoooticer: :marseycoomer3:




















46





































New



Old



Top



Bottom



Controversial



Random



















Jump in the discussion.


No email address required.






















How was marriage already not set to a minimum of 18? :marseyxd: I know it required parental approval most likely but still.































Jump in the discussion.


No email address required.





















Imagine 2 16 year old make a baby. They would benefit from marriage status































Jump in the discussion.


No email address required.





















I get that and even had a couple get married at 17 in my hs class because of a pregnancy ( they just ended up getting divorced anyway since the dude was an r-slured alcoholic but anyway) Just seems like if 18 is gonna be the age of adulthood though then they should be consistent with it, also because the parental approval factor can still lead to abuse:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/child-marriage-united-states-donna-pollard/
Edit:
https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2015/10/28/452540839/children-get-married-in-the-u-s-too-15girls
"Tahirih also compiled data that included the age and gender of those getting married in the state of Virginia. Between the years 2004 and 2013, records showed brides and grooms as young as 12. In 2013, there were 199 brides and 28 grooms age 17 and under. More specifically, nine brides (and no grooms) were 15; 58 brides and 8 grooms were age 16; and 132 brides and 20 grooms were 17."
That's a lot more underage brides than grooms :marseydeadinside2:
I'd be fine with it if they banned underage girls from marrying adult men. The ban on underage marriage is usually because it leads to abuse by an older partner.































Jump in the discussion.


No email address required.





















I feel minimum should be 16 with some real stringent conditions until 18 (groom no more than 2-3 years older, with express consent of the parents of both parties, and maybe something else I'm not thinking of).
Even then, I'd be leery.































Jump in the discussion.


No email address required.





















I think those are fair requirements. But yeah. It should be treated with a lot of caution.































Jump in the discussion.


No email address required.



































hypergamy. typical.































Jump in the discussion.


No email address required.





















:marseyxd: jfc































Jump in the discussion.


No email address required.





















:marseywink:































Jump in the discussion.


No email address required.





















:#marseypolyamory:































Jump in the discussion.


No email address required.























































 Reported by:






okay, give me the chud award, but they really want the kids to frick with out consequence so their pair bonding is shot by the time they are 18 or out of college or 25 or have a master's degree you sick freak.































Jump in the discussion.


No email address required.





















Do you think white chicks are going to the multiple MLK Blvd abortion clinics in every city?































Jump in the discussion.


No email address required.










































You could be legally emancipated :marseybigbrain:
  • In 2018, Sununu signed a bill to raise the minimum age of marriage to 16.
  • For more than a hundred years, the law had allowed 13-year-old girls and 14-year-old boys to get married with parent and court approval.
  • On Thursday, two amendments were proposed to allow some exceptions for those under 18 to get married if they have been legally emancipated.































Jump in the discussion.


No email address required.





















I think if they've been emancipated then it's fair. I've just heard lots of stories of like 15 year old girls being r*ped and then pressured by their parents into marrying the dude much older than them and it just seems like a generally bad situation.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/she-was-american-child-bride-now-genevieve-fighting-stop-it-n1000276
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/asian-america/was-forced-wed-13-now-s-helped-make-child-marriage-illegal-ny-rcna1730
I'd be ok with teenagers getting married as long as the dude they're marrying is also a minor as a requirement. That's totally fine.































Jump in the discussion.


No email address required.




























They were reparation'd!































Jump in the discussion.


No email address required.



































Everyone going to highschool wasn't really a thing until 1940 or so. And even after that in the more rural states dropping out a year or two in wasn't completely unheard of. That's why the GED exists.































Jump in the discussion.


No email address required.



































Yeah that's super weird to say and even weirder when you see the guy. Ok he's a state senator and it's one dude blah blah blah…but yeah anyways I agree with arrr politics :marseyimpossibru:































Jump in the discussion.


No email address required.





















Same :marseyitsover: :marseyrope:































Jump in the discussion.


No email address required.



































!moidmoment































Jump in the discussion.


No email address required.




























Pedos (of all types and sizes) are bad; it's just common sense! :marseypedosnipe:
...but alas, because of the contentious nature of such a status, it has led to both sides militarizing the term more as a smear tactic for people they don't like, which can be hypocritical considering that...
:marseylibleft: "RepubliKKKans and Christians (the white kind not the black kind) are all sexist pigs who will not hesitate to ELIMINATE women's rights and force EVERY single little girl to become perfect tradwife slaves to endlessly groom and breed (like literally 1984 Handmaiden's Tale!!!), but CLEARLY the middle schoolers who were invited by their cougar lesbian librarians to dress in leather and twerk to the crowd on a pride month parade are actually enlightened queer revolutionaries who are sexually LIBERATED and COMFORTABLE with their bodies, and only a brainwashed KKKonserative that wishes it was Biblical times (or the 1950s) would be against such a thing!"
:marseychud: "The (((deep state))) are Satan-worshipping child traffickers who deliver all these poor innocents WHITE children to every single Democrat politcuck and :marseytrain: as slaves to r*pe and groom, but consooming dozens of loli hentai manga is actually BASED and a REDPILLED sigma male behavior, and trying to get it banned is CLEARLY a Cultural Marxist infringement on MY God-given rights to enjoy this TRAD BEAUTIFUL CUNNY that is untouched by moralstragging b-word feminists!!"
!grillers































Jump in the discussion.


No email address required.





















Impressive. Normally people with such severe developmental disabilities struggle to write much more than a sentence or two. He really has exceded our expectations for the writing portion. Sadly the coherency of his writing, along with his abilities in the social skills and reading portions, are far behind his peers with similar disabilities.































Jump in the discussion.


No email address required.




























!deepstate































Jump in the discussion.


No email address required.



































IDC
MANDATORY STATE GFS NOW































Jump in the discussion.


No email address required.





















as a post revolution leader, i'll take a fat state gf to set a good example































Jump in the discussion.


No email address required.




























This































Jump in the discussion.


No email address required.



































Apparently this is a hot take in $CurrentYear, but I think that children should not be allowed to marry or cut off their genitals.































Jump in the discussion.


No email address required.




























The rightoids are getting uppity.































Jump in the discussion.


No email address required.




























Women should not have the right to choose who to mate and breed with. That decision should be made for them by rational men of intelligence. If women continue to have rights, they will only hinder the advancement of the human race by breeding with degenerate men and creating stupid, degenerate offspring. This will cause humanity to become even more depraved with each generation. Women have more power in human society than they deserve, all because of s*x. There is no creature more evil and depraved than the human female.
Snapshots:
https://old.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/1cku49h/gop_official_argues_in_favor_of_child_marriage/:































Jump in the discussion.


No email address required.






























































Link copied to clipboard

















Action successful!








Error, please refresh the page and try again.