Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This but unironically. But just because I'm not going to support DeBeers' bullshit. If a woman wants you to just dump money in a burn pile for her, kick her b-word butt out.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah if I ever get married she's gonna have to accept a lab-grown diamond. It's the same fricking thing minus the child slave labor involved in harvesting "real" diamonds.


Current hyperfixation: https://i.rdrama.net/images/17146091388618665.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Nah it's deeper than that, wedding rings came about because of a massive DeBeers marketing campaign, but that's because America stopped recognizing/honoring breach-of-promise lawsuits,something I learned about from an old episode of Andy Griffith my parents were watching. Essentially if a man asked to marry a woman and then changed his mind, a woman could sue him,because once a man popped the question,even in the old days the hanky-panky usually started and there was a non-zero chance he knocked her up, but either way,; her smv as they thought of it back then took a huge hit. So basically women could sue men for stealing their virginity. The diamonds came in to replace that because it showed the man had a significant investment in the woman and wasn't playing around,and then once the question was popped, they would also hanky-panky. Today, it makes no sense when on average, if you're stupid enough to marry a woman, 4-7 men have enjoyed her before you,they don't honor their virginity so why should a man buy a big butt gemstone that was essentially buying it(her virginity) in the old days?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.