Context: The BBC put out an article acknowledging that men on the bottom rung don't get kitty. Naturally, foids are out in force to pretend the reason for this isn't obvious.
Don't believe your lying eyes! The fact that every primitive culture from the Amazon, to Africa, to Australia, displays the same divergence in gender roles doesn't mean anything. Not only are women the hunters, they're also better at it, sweaty 
It means foids are a net drain to the government purse. They use more public services, and receive more in government benefits, than they pay in tax.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2375926
Never ask a foid (or a moid, to be fair) what they're looking for in a partner. Look at who they choose when given the option - revealed preferences über alles.
https://gwern.net/doc/psychology/okcupid/thebigliespeopletellinonlinedating.html
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The studies showing that women were "Hunter/Gatherers" didn't make distinctions between size of game they would take. In most cases, they found evidence of women using bows, slings, or spears that would have been effective for small game like rabbits and fowl.
The most sensible conclusion to draw is that women stayed near camp and gathered edible plants and hunted small game when the opportunity presented itself while the men ranged further out to hunt large game.
The studies also excluded the vast majority of cases, where they couldn't determine the s*x of the hunter, and cite the percentage where they could and found a woman. It was something like 400 total, 60 where s*x could be determined, and around 30 with female hunters, which they declared is "50% of the time, women also hunted"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context