Sure you might they think they left alot of stuff out but don't worry they got you covered in the comments.
UPDATE: Lots of folks are upset that we didn't include posts from SBI's CEO or Kotaku writers that make them look very bad. Omitting these wasn't part of an agenda in our reporting - we just judged them as being unrelated to the core story (SBI injecting wokeness). Basically, we have to draw the line somewhere or we'd spend hours going over antagonistic posts on all sides.
Certainly, these posts make for a juicier narrative and make it easier to "pick sides," but believe it or not, that's what we're trying to AVOID doing. As much as we can, anyway.
With a topic like this - everyone's going to have a side and a version of events they want to see represented. We try our best to operate outside of those expectations, which basically means we're always going to disappoint someone. L
UPDATE UPDATE: We'll have a brief response to concerns in this story in our next report. Don't unsubscribe until then.
and they follow up with
The core story is that SBI has no real influence. The follow-up story is to dogpile on woke people that paint targets on their backs.
See guys they have no power and we're just going to ignore everything they did.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Sweetbaby themselves are just indulgency merchants capitalizing on social superstition, they don't really do anything that the studios that invoke them wouldn't already do, their presence is a red flag by itself
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context