As someone who is painfully plugged into online discourse to the point where I may soon just need to go live in an arctic cabin somewhere, I have borne witness to a narrative this year in the media landscape, namely across movies and TV, where right-wing media consumers and influencers believe they have defeated "woke" games and shows and those who support them, while claiming "wins" of their own. It feels like there's a new one of these that comes up every month, and I figured it was time to break down the perception of what's going on here, and the reality of what's happening.
Successes of "anti-woke" things are claimed as scalps, whether that was actually the intent of that work or not. Failures of "woke" things are purely because they're woke, not any other reason at all, ignoring any and all other factors. This happens every time, and it's time to add them all up here to show what's going on. Prepare the "cope and seethe," as they say.
Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League
Perception -- This was a "woke" version of the Arkham universe in which characters like Harley Quinn were more conservatively dressed than previously and there were things like Pride flags hanging out in base headquarters. A consulting agency named Sweet Baby Inc. was used in development of the game to advise on making things overly inclusive,
Reality -- Suicide Squad failed mightily because it was a live service game after Rocksteady had made its entire fanbase devoted to its single player superhero offerings, and not a particularly good one at that. It was a goofy concept, giving all Task Force X members the same guns, few differences in powers and aborting a storyline halfway through to do a live service concept which featured a dozen Brainiac copies. All based on an IP with one critically savaged movie and one box office failure in the DCEU. Supposedly woke critics scored the game a 60, one of the lowest major releases of the year.
Concord
Perception -- A hero shooter that failed because it's heroes were not attractive enough, and they were "virtue signaling" by putting pronouns in their select screens.
Reality -- Concord started development right after Overwatch launched in 2016 and arrived to the shooter landscape dated, with an ill-conceived $40 price tag in a F2P landscape and failing to meaningfully stand-out from its competition. Its character designs were poor, not for "hotness" reasons, but because of a lacking aesthetic that other games, with plenty of similarly sized and aged characters, had done much better. Supposedly woke critics scored the game a 65, lower than all its multiplayer rivals.
The Acolyte
Perception -- The "woke" series featured essentially no white male characters and focused on a cult of space witches, at least a pair of which were lesbians. The showrunner is a lesbian and her wife is in the show. The series broke canon and disrespected "true" Star Wars fans. This cancellation was even celebrated by Elon Musk who declared the series "went woke and went broke," as is the eternal mantra of this group.
Reality -- The show cost $180 million to make. It was the least-watched Star Wars show which is not a surprise given that it was trying to tell a story with wholly original characters and no connections to the Skywalker era. Every time people said it broken canon, upon closer inspection it did not in fact break canon, and critics either misunderstood the source material or were claiming Legends was still canon. Cost to viewership was the reason it was cancelled.
Stellar Blade
Perception -- The game was a big hit for AAA newcomer SHIFT UP because it embraced the idea that real g*mers want attractive women in their games, and they were provided plenty of fan service outfits to fulfill that desire.
Reality -- Stellar Blade is a solid action game on the whole and reviewed well among video game journ*lists, drawing an 81 on Metacritic and heralded as a great first effort for SHIFT UP.
Helldivers 2
Perception -- A game about killing bugs and bots and without woke agendas, it was a celebration of the kind of patriotism the left fails to embrace in the modern era.
Reality -- The entire game is based on Starship Troopers, a very clear, famous skewering of those very concepts. Journ*lists scored the game an 82 and it has been in conversation as a possible, if not likely, GOTY shortlist candidate.
The First Descendant
Perception -- The PvE hero shooter is full of attractive women which is responsible for its surging popularity, and its live plan has so far been introducing more attractive women, to ensure its ongoing success.
Reality -- The game succeeds mainly because it's a well-structured looter with meaningful progression systems and endless targeted farms. It struggles with RNG, however, and the game has seen precipitous playercount drops, down from 265,000 on Steam to 40,000 in a couple months, so its long-term future is uncertain.
Black Myth: Wukong
Perception -- Games media "wanted this game to fail" based on an IGN article that discussed sexism within Game Science in the past and its success is a blow against woke agendas.
Reality -- The game is an absolutely crushing, massive hit in China where no one is considering any of these controversies when purchasing. Again, games journ*lists scored the game a very positive 81.
The mental gymnastics here are always one of the following:
A game considered woke fails, and the reason is because it is woke
A game that succeeds must not be woke, or its woke aspects can be explained away as not really being woke after all
A game is considered anti-woke for some perceived reason and it being anti-woke is the reason it is a hit
A sentence or two from a single review or a specific tweet means that *all *woke journ*lists or players love or hate something
It's a set of moving goalposts where "woke and not woke" are whatever is convenient for the narrative at the moment. Baldur's Gate 3, the woke-ist game on planet earth won scores of GOTY awards but that's not really woke because, after all, it had attractive characters in it. You could say the same for almost every major hit of the past decade in some form or another.
On the other side, games "claimed" by anti-woke players like Stellar Blade or The First Descendant are in no way owned by them, and either review well among the supposedly woke games media and/or have playerbases far more expansive than those who are playing because attractive characters exist in them. The truth is no one is making games for this crowd specifically, which is part of what upsets them, and what has forced them to break down these wins and losses in their own minds.
This won't stop, and it's only getting worse in recent years. But it's important to understand what's going on here, and what isn't, despite what's being claimed.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What makes something woke or not woke mostly comes down to how it's treated by game journos. BG3 is really progressive but got a lot of hate (at first) by game journos, so it seen as a win for the anti-woke crowd. Stellar Blade was hit with the "g*mers don't know what women look like" nonsense, etc.
Look at the circus around that Harry Potter game; That game was very progressive but it was deemed evil by the woke clique.
It kind of goes like this: Woke journos try to poison pill a game before it comes out. If the game is still successful, they're try to claim it and/or memory hole a lot of their criticism. See Nier Automata for example...
The actual themes do not matter. It's about a small group of people trying to hold onto influence.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
BG3 was successful for both crowds. Initially it was because an indie studio had delievered a "feature complete*" game that raised the bar of its genre, drawing massive ire from slacker gamedevs who try really really hard to make terrible to okay-ish games. Gaymers love pooping on these devs, so they were pleased. Twittoids and journoids were eventually also pleased, because it presented a myraid of safe-horny ways for queer folx to represent themselves. I don't remember journos ever hating on BG3, it was always that one coping gamedev dude on twitter saying please guys don't expect so much from us now that someone else did our thing but 100x better.
*I have never played the game, but apparently the later portions of it have a bunch of cut stuff, but not to the extent of interfering with the main plot stuff
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I've been a Larian fan for a minute... So I've been sneeding at the journo commentary going back to when it was in early release.
Maybe hate is the wrong word but there seemed to be a push to take it down a notch. There was a lot of "entitled g*mer" articles, smug "it's overrated" takes, 3rd act sucks, this mod is problematic, etc. Which is fine (and has a lot of truth to it) but compare it to the same commentary for Starfield, which released around the same time...
And now that it's roundly accepted to be a good game (it got awards so it has to be good), a lot of that criticism has been memory holed.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The third act only sucks if you did nothing of substance in the first two, which sets up the third to tie up storylines.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It was a little rough at launch but Larian has been good with patches.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They got 500 dollars, that's your value as an employee at the minimum. Do more.
Not to mention, not enough s*x scenes. I could write 17 paragraphs with all the gay s*x I'd like to see. Larian, do better.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What do you mean?!
It's a metaphor for how Larian, and other devs, should have more gay s*x and make bigger titties.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Eh, it was a stretch But I kind of like that Marsey
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Wokoids will never get a monopoly over gaming and idk why they bothered trying. There's just too many edgy teenagers, incel NEETs, and devs who read Slatestar Codex for them to overcome. Resistance is futile.
I read 0% of your post btw.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
tl;dr - this game is fricking supposedly woke, but it isn't, and it failed because of some other reason that has nothing to do at all with the fricking woke factor.
This game is not fricking woke and is fricking successfully but not because it lacked woke stuff but because of another factor.
It was fricking very arbitrary and stupid.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Paul Tassi cried about Disney cancelling the Acolyte because he said they were emboldening the racist misogynists and that Disney was bending the knee to them. Now he wants to act like it was just cancelled due to money and the chuds didn't have anything to do with it. Which way is it and why does Forbes even have a video game writer on payroll no one is buying a subscription to read about video games?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Bad faith argument. People just didnt watch it because it was original characters and there was already a negative perception around Disney's Original Star Wars content. Thats literally it. There is only ever one reason people make decisions so if they make the same decisions it must be for the same reason. I would know, a journo told me
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I like just like it when media implodes
im literally screaming,
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
So woketards simply tend to make shit games more often than not? Got it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Woketards and commies are cut from the same cloth - incapable of creative integrity because they think all media and art must be made to function as political propaganda for their gay little ideology.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
True. The past few years have really changed my view of the market vs subsidised art.
Market appeal actually does a lot to prevent slop, as hard to believe as it sounds.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The average consumer is smarter than the average overeducated, pseudo-intellectual media literacy enjoyer (cute twink)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
no different than chuds really, all from the same autіstic INTJ race
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
"I read twitter outrage threads for 15 minutes a day and then use it as a source for my shitty articles that no one reads"
and Isn't this guy doing exactly what he's claiming the evil chuds are doing, claiming games as woke/non woke then coping why they fail or succeed?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
nah, he's doing it in good faith so it's all good. though he seems to have missed dustborn in his list of games chuds are pooping on, but I'm sure he'd be able to come up with a big brain reason as to why it's not doing well.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I wouldn't call it that really. If you aren't actively looking for it you won't see more gay shit than say, old Dragon Age games or Mass Effect.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I dont remember seeing any gay shit beyond the gay vampire in bg3. I heard you could frick a bear in it, but they dont show anything so whats the point? And getting worled up over weird relationship simulations im video games is so weird. Bioware would have been doing the world a favor by never putting any relationship stuff in Kotor or DA or that weird kung fu game. The kung fu game is my favorite.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They're playersexual so if you play a guy every other guy is gay
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Cope. Open cope cope
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The steelmanned argument is never that woke politics is solely responsible for torpedoing a game, but that it reflects a deeper corporate rot and mediocracy that that continually produces poor/"Millenial" writing, prioritizes diversity hiring/promotions over actual talent cultivation, etc. etc. Wokeshit is an indirect red flag.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
You let the bait get a little too obvious here
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Paul Tassi might legitimately be the only games journo who A: actually plays vidya and 2) is experiencing genuine cognitive dissonance about wokies ruining his hobby
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
He is right tho !nonchuds chuds can't even be assed to read the J*urnoids article before pooping out r-slurred buzzwords like the toddlers they are
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I mean it's completely fair to point out there are other factors in media failure besides DEI frickery and wokeness.
Acting like it has no bearing on it at all though just makes you an actual r-slur.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah, but he takes it up a fricking notch by ignoring any woke feature and blaming failure on another factor. For non-woke games, he doesn't attribute anything to their lack of woke nonsense in its success because of some other factor. The fricking "other factors" keep changing for each game, so you know he was fricking being very scientific about it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Libertarian talking ^
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Woke versus anti is a dumb argument but are you really trying to deny that attractive characters matter? There are dozens of studies showing that attractive people have advantages in basically every social arena and there's no reason to expect that this wouldn't extend to video games.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Who gives a shit either way? Like, why is anyone concerned how woke or anti-woke video game and TV slop is?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I just want as many queer women as possible to be purged from our cultural and educational institutions.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I love fact checks & deboonkings
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
That r-slur does realize it could be two things? It was shit and woke.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Sounds like a lot of "woke" stuff fails due to being boring or due to own goals and then "anti-woke" people claim victory they had nothing to do with. So "woke" is not being defeated by "chuds", it is mostly imploding.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Made sense to me until it started complaining about moving goalposts. Moving goalposts back and forth is the culture war.
Theres also not enough evidence to say these complaints didnt factor in to sales, but apparently there cant be multiple reasons something underperforms
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Snapshots:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/paultassi/2024/08/28/the-woke-war-why-the-right-believes-its-dominated-gaming-and-tv-in-2024/:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Game journos have to be thinking it at this point
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They would never be so generous
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
maybe if they make all the games woke, these losers might find better things to do with their time
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Gaming "Journ*lists" are not bullied nearly enough
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I have a theory that journos were paid to be woke and hate on fun stuff while acting as an authority and arbiters of gaming culture simply to make sure videogames keep their air of rebellious media. Frick off journos, games are for the players! The problem is when the rank and file of the game companies didn't get the memo that journos are paid to be the heel and not actually supposed to be listened too, they starting putting those journo ideas into games.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
title is a false premise
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context