Guardian gave it 100/100 we can throw that review in garbage can
Author of the review made a whole big butt article where he bitching about cutscene
Any one who played video games know a cutscene is better than an in-game cute scene where you can control your character because those are unskippable.
Mote bs reviewers and here it comes
https://n4g.com/news/2652490/civilization-7-review-ign#comments
IGN 7/10 basically the lowest score they could give
https://www.eurog*mer.net/civilization-7-review
Eurogaymers 4/10
So the game ain't that good.
Game probably will be in decent state after like 5 years and 100 paid dlc's
Sad but I guess only monster hunter and yakuza pirates for me in February and then in March butt shadow, atelier yumia, dead or alive prism
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I was looking forward to it too
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's always like this, five and six were launched with half the features they had by the end
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
yeah I remember. It's why I seethe whenever zoomers tell me civ 5 is the best and 6 sucks.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Civ 5 is the best. Civ 6 does suck.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
"oh look at my r-slurred butt i settled 4 cities and turtled"
Keep yourself safe
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
"You have to go wide and not tall, or it isn't civ!!!!"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Back in my day being "tall" meant you were going to be plundered for your wonders eventually. Expand or die.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
isn't it boring to always play the same way bb?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
To be fair, I've played like maybe 10 games total in Civ 5
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
CivV introduced the nonsensical notion that going "tall" should be an equally viable strategy in a 4X game
The game hardcoding handouts to you for failing to grow your empire is asinine
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Is Civ V actually a 2X since the expand and exterminate options are completely superfluous and suboptimal
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
They stopped being nearly as punishing for expanding in Civ 6. You run into issues with insufficient amenities but you can actually work through that, compared to civ 5 where having your happiness drop below 0 was basically a death sentence.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I like 5, but 4 is objectively better. 6 does suck though.
I just refuse to play 6 because they went from Based King Sejong in 5 to Literally The Worst Foid in Korean History Who Fricked Up Her Kingdom So Hard It Took a Literal Genius 60 Years to Fix and then another Literal Genius Another 20 Years to Regain Land The Worst Foid Lost in 6.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
yeah leaders sucked in 6 and that got worse in 7
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
dang you got me, I've only played 5 lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
5 was only needed 2 DLCs to reach full operational power.
6 is .....real Rowling Goblin Power Hour.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
my heart is telling me
people should wait two years and buy the super extra deluxe platinum edition during the winter sale for $24.99
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
They want 80 euros for this shit, was a hard pass for me
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context