Reported by:
- Unbroken : We shouldn't have to tolerate this, carp
- NotLikeOtherFoids : gross
- Shreddedmanlet : Carp please have Yellow Fever award made.
- WulongLongdong : Posting jailbait to own the non-libertarians. Mop and rope jannies
- of_blood_and_salt : ^what he said
- A30B_BATTALION : keep yourself safe
- JannyStomper
This college girl 
pays you to teach her advanced econometrics and time series analysis
What do you do?
- 83
- -23
Now playing: School House Harmony (DKC2).mp3
Top Poster of the Day:
911roofer
Current Registered Users: 30,841
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
HOLES
PING GROUPS
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Libertarians always use this excuse but my hatred for child molestors is more significant than my hatred for women so it doesnt work
Humans spent most of our existence murdering eachother but thats illegal too, "dude raping 8 year olds is natural" is a garbage argument
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
and butt
s*x is? strags are as unnatural as libertarians.
false.
lol, foid
logic. might as well 
chop 
ur peepee 
off cause you have no balls.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
My point was that the naturalistic fallacy is a named fallacy for a reason. "Its natural to do X/its not natural to do Y" is not a coherent argument
Proofs?
Im sorry to say but you dont seem to understand the word "logic" very well based on the above, but thats okay. You can just say "i want to frick 12 year olds and thats my reason", that would be a better argument
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
there is something to be said about evolutionarily successful paradigms. evolution
barred pregnancy until 13ish, so there 
was some advantage there. but social 
hysteria still hasn't explain why i should give 
a frick 
about raising the bar past that.
my point
was there 
is no "wider" trend towards attraction to youth, that was always the trend.
and you haven't made any coherent arguments against it. pointing
out perceived fallacies does prove anything cause fallacies aren't inherently incorrect, named the fallacy 
fallacy 
chud.
literally just
chop 
ur peepee 
off already, this sheeplefried foid 
logic 
is boring 
as frick. 
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
And also about socially successful political paradigms like the concept of informed consent which underlies many western laws. Anyway "evolutionarily successful paradigms" include genghis khan murdering half a continent so just because it worked once does not mean it should be encouraged.
Wrong, liberal democracy is the only truly successful period in human history and has recognized for over 100 years that allowing libertarians to frick 12 year olds leads to harm on the societal and individual levels. When underage marriage was common, divorce was not. If you want to frick a 12 year old you should be stuck with her until you die. Otherwise you just have a bunch of mentally damaged single mother foids running around ruining literally everything
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
errrr, no, society
can and does pull off braindead paradigms that frick 
it over 
in the long 
run ... and do it lot quicker than evolution 
can pull off.
more cope
cause that didn't last now did it? can you be less r-slurred 
please?
total cope, literally no one made this argument
when actually 
making laws. the laws were made entirely baed on gut reactions to the concept without any unbiased consideration. doesn't explain the hysteria over 
males either.
and the political paradigm isn't based
on "informed consent", any more than drug 
laws are based 
on "protecting people". both 
problems are heavily steeped in underlying social 
causes we aren't addressing ...
cause most people are barely thinking
sheeple 
too subconscious to realize how violence 
hatred is literally always wrong, including you.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
We are going in circles now but i genuinely cant parse this so im just going to ask what you mean:
Wut
Also muh sheeple is an argument most frequently utilized by 13 year olds. If youre 13 (including mentally, as is apparent) then I retract my accusation that you are a libertarian
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
cause ur opinion is informed by unrationalized gut reaction that has no bearing on why people started forcing the childhood virgin narrative down everyone's throats, in manner that is so religiously dogmatic they won't even allow alternative experiments to exist.
so? i find myself on a planet of people operating mostly on gut reaction without ever putting much unbiased thought into things. the amount of utter sin/insanity we are normalized to is both ungodly and unsustainable.
if you really gave a shit about solving single motherhood ... removing all exposure to sexuality as child probably isn't the right fricking way to do it. making people more ignorant of sexuality isn't going to then allow them to produce better decisions over it in the future ... i mean, literally no other form of knowledge is expected to work like this except carnal, apparently. like most of foid thought ... whatever r-slurred ad hoc rationalization pathetically attempting justify this emotion sourced hysteria, will form nothing more than a baseless house of cards.
ur too much a sheeple to even respond coherently, so just give up already.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If your complaint is "no fair stop being mean to the poor libertarians, use your words" then why are you calling me the foid? violence is a good thing and dissenters should be crushed. Thinking otherwise is feminine
Ah yes protecting children is a sin and raping 12 year olds is godly. Thanks Mr. Moore, I will keep that in mind
Gut reactions serve an evolutionary purpose too, you know
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context