Bong footballer gets r*pe charges dropped, feminists seething [Mason Greenwood]
https://x.com/TheSun/status/1621147308875472897
Mason Greenwood CLEARED of all chargeshttps://t.co/S8M7Hdnyae pic.twitter.com/gv2Hp56mak
— The Sun (@TheSun) February 2, 2023
Quick timeline:
Alleged audio of him trying to r*pe her: https://x.com/thfc___dan/status/1621155177146507271
They get back together: https://www.manutdtimes.com/harriet-robsons-recent-activity-hints-mason-greenwood-could-be-back-playing-for-manchester-united-again/
Charges laid: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-63272019
Charges dropped: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-64502021
Reddit discusses:
https://old.reddit.com/r/soccer/comments/10rqn2z/greater_manchester_police_criminal_proceedings/
.webp?h=11 "Nuzzles, pounces on you, UwU, you're so warm!..")
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Foids sneeding because they haven't quite managed to replace "Innocent Until Proven Guilty" with "Listen and Believe!"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
BIPOC
did you listen to the audio
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
He absolutely did it. Normally I'm a "don't judge till the trial happens" but yeah
he did it. Quit being r-slurred, r-slur.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I prefer my trials to be based on more than one single piece of information taken out of context, thanks.
These two could have known each other for years. Maybe she texted him afterwards begging for some peepee. Maybe they're into rough s*x and this is part of their dynamic. But hey, you gave me a sixty second audio clip, which is obviously enough to pass judgement on the entire case. LOCK HIM UP! We should give him ten years, one for every six seconds in that audio clip. Trial by jury has never been this speedy and efficient!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
"Stop, I don't want s*x" - the Foid
"I don't give
a frick" - the Male feminist
Are you r-slurred
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Well then, explain why the jury acquitted him. Are they all r-slurred? Or is it more likely that they had access to more information than just a single out-of-context audio clip?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The jury didn't acquit him you fricking
r-slur. It didn't go to court, because the r*pe 
victim 
has battered 
wife syndrome and won't testify.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You don't need to press charges in a criminal case, r-slur. The DA can choose to press charges anyway if they feel they have enough evidence
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context