Average sized nips, small sized in spirit 
Context
Video talking about the cafe:
Link to tweet discussing when it first opened
The coffee shop was a worker (one worker to be specific) owned, anti capitalist, anti colonial (?) cafe. Where you could read all 
from great progressive authors while enjoying a cup of overpriced coffee.
They leaned heavily into creating a safe space of People of color, so no dumb cops or army people were allowed on the premise. 
.
The cafe also made the wise choice of being open from 9 to 5, the time when all of the working class people were wage cucking lol
They also had this cool idea where you only had to pay as much as you could afford. Surely this wouldn't backfire 
Anyway less than a year later the cafe opening, the cafe shuts down and the owner puts at a statement on why it failed:
Unfortunately, the lack of generational wealth/seed capital from ethically bankrupt sources left me unable to weather the quiet winter season, or to grow in the ways needed to be sustainable longer-term,"
The landlord was also giving them a 50% discount on their rent and that darn capitalism still managed to shut them down 
Link to article about the cafe failing
Drama
R/Toronto Thread
As opposed to the super intelligent anti capitalist hate monger that couldnt keep their business alive for more than a year paying 1/2 price rent.🤔
For most of us it's worked out pretty well! And the alternatives don't look very appealing.
Yes, it worked well if you are a boomer who was able to buy up all the properties and become a full time landlord. For, the rest of us housing has become a luxury. This in my eyes is a systematic failure.
I'm GenX and have been eating the shit most of my adult life. But jcd ain't wrong (and often is), no alternative system provides better quality of life for the majority of people that we've figured out, thus far. Where we're really failing is on who we elect and how we balance our current system. But that's a whole other topic.
You do realize that capitalism is one of the only systems that marks basic human needs as luxuries? The only difference is that failures under capitalism are not properly accounted for. If a person is homeless under capitalism, it’s marked as the persons fault and not the states. If a person is hungry under capitalism, it’s marked as the persons fault and not the states. Since capitalism depends on the core belief that the meritocracy is real, every failure is attributed to personal failure and not a systematic issue. This is why people think capitalism is the best system because every failure is accredited to the individual suffering those conditions.
R/Neoliberal
Having dealt with co-ops, they tend to be really poorly run and are prone to major internal political drama as different types of employees have different interests. Older co-op owners tend not to want to reinvest in the business to maximize their own returns. Smarter younger owners do want to reinvest so they make more money long term. Dumb younger owners want to do all sorts of different shit. People want to cut corners. People don't want to do bad jobs and everyone suddenly thinks they're a business genius.
Your argument basically boils down to "people are too dumb for democracy to work". I'm not asking this to be snarky, this is honestly something I struggle with myself. Do you think that the problem you describe here justifies the authoritarian mode of production we use now? If so, why is this different from how we run our governments? Should we be modeling our government more like China's to make sure it's run better and not prone to internal political drama?
vibes
R/Destiny
it's just laughing at a stupid business that existed in contradiction to what it seemingly was preaching. it's like having a pro-Semitic non-racist Jewish Death Camp or a homosexual who's only attracted to the opposite s*x.
Frick lefties I wish them the worst, this bottom feeding commie hopefully learns what being poor is
Twitter Sneed
NOOOO THE CUSTOMERS HAD THE WRONG VALUES THATS WHY IT FAILED
Someone make a marsey of the meme
No and I dont care
[Twitter search for the cafe](https://x.com/search?q=toronto cafe&t=SL0NgnPVHsAMTlONYcbNjg&s=09) mostly just capitalist chuds gloating
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I honestly don’t mind online communists that much but something about Anarchists makes me want to beat them to death with a sock filled with nickels.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The absence of a state and hierarchy among humans is an inherent impossibility - humans will naturally form gangs, leadership and tribes regardless and those will become states in practice, no matter what. The anarchist has no path to get what he wants, and no path to keep it that way should he get there, and is entirely divorced from the very nature of power and structure amongst humans.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The only based thing communists ever did was bussyblast anarkiddies, repetitively, all through history.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It's because they can't even be anarchists properly. Anarcho-whateverism is a cop-out and basically admission that you know anarchism wouldn't work.
I don't even know what an anarcho-communist government would do, other than hunt down anyone who trys to trade shit.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Anarchism is childish fantasy put to "politics"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It’s because you’re stupid.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Think there's something suspicious about anyone who is so devoted to an ideology that promotes a co-operative, voluntary, self-governing flat society that they make enemies with everyone who isn't on board and generally act like an entitled brat.
If anarchy ever was introduced, these types would be banished on day 2.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes. I think I inherently hate lazy people and modern anarchists tend to fit that bill to a T.
Like it’s basically the ideology of someone who hasn’t worked an actual day in their life because they have some fake ‘sensory’ disorder or something and act like they will appraise anime all day while the peasants will be toiling in the fields.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes they imagine there'll be room for a whole class of people who make crafts, read stories to people or generally add no value to the society and that the new fledgling society will accept that when it needs workers and strivers to make it happen.
They basically imagine themselves to be the new lazy upper class bourgeoisie which is why they can't be taken seriously. If they were up to their necks in mud digging the mass graves for their enemies, maybe they'd get some respect.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's because r-slurred anarchist ideologies stupidly rely on the good will of others while ignoring human nature and the willingness of others to cooperate. It's an ideology for r-slurs that should be relentlessly bullied.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context