Enrico_MotassaHank/Hank
Got my hat now itโs time to grill bb ๐ฅ
2yr ago#441872
Edited None
spent 0 currency on pings
B-but now the sweet pibble won't be able to give sweet kisses to cats, small dogs and toddlers.
Also if you don't collar your dog, you're not even doing the very minimum of responsible pet ownership. Your dog deserves to suffer for your bad choices.
PatriceOneale/acc
We went to a musical called "Oh Africa, Brave Africa". It was a laugh riot.
Arran 2yr ago#442395
Edited None
spent 0 currency on pings
I havenโt laughed that hard in a while. Thank you
From the moment it premiered Family Guy has been relevant and it has never stopped being relevant ever since. It is the only show that consistently managed to keep up with the development of humor; from inventing the word "normie" in 2000 (influencing chan culture), to Peter Griffin grinding his gears (influencing millennial advice animal memes), to Quagmire potty (influencing surreal humor). There is an entire Tumblr subculture that swaps the faces of family characters on other ones (something that the makers of the show themselves started as well). The plurality of the comedy deployed by the writers ensures that almost every demographic gets to enjoy Family Guy. It has been pointed out that even post-ironicism has been greatly influenced by Family Guy, with proponents of this theory specifically pointing to the "Peter Griffin explains" meme which is a direct reference to a similar joke made on Family Guy.
There is a severe lack of culturally relevant references produced by other shows. Take The Simpsons, some would point to sneed (1999) or reaction images (all of which have been around since 9gag). We can rightfully point out that almost all Simpson references are old and outdated. Most other shows don't fare well in cultural relevancy either; you will almost never see a reference to Bojack Horseman, American Dad, or Bob's Burgers. I could list more but most of these shows are even less relevant than the Chinese cartoons enjoyed by weeaboos. Even a bigger show like Rick and Morty stopped being relevant after 2018 when their trademarked pickle joke became stale. South Park which is praised by many rightoids is only relevant in select rightoid spaces. And despite being written by a leftoid, Family Guy still manages to PERFORM BETTER with rightoids.
Enjoying family guy "ironically" or "loving to hate" the show still counts towards its entertainment plurality and its cultural relevancy.
Many of the criticisms of Family Guy are often poorly substantiated and come from a trend present specifically in millennials and gen-x individuals; the trend to "hate" a certain piece of entertainment for the sake of hating it. A similar phenomenon could be witnessed with the Star Wars prequels, which were hated in the mid-2000s and early 2010s but are now miraculously beloved (often by the same people who hated them at first). We should therefore not confuse genuine criticism with influenced criticism, in this case, influenced by a particular trend that originated in mid-2000s internet culture. The embodiment of that "trend" being the multi-part episode "Cartoon Wars" released by South Park in 2006; which criticized family guy but lacked any real substance to said criticism. It has been pointed out by Trey Parker himself that the fact that the majority of Hollywood hated Family Guy in the mid-2000s can partially be attributed to JEALOUSY reasons regarding its high ratings.
Almost everyone is casually invested in family guy, not as self-declared "fans" like many of the aforementioned shows; liking Family Guy isn't even seen as an interest. People call themselves "Rick and Morty-" or "South Park fans", but no one calls themselves a Family Guy fan. This is because liking Family Guy is the status quo. It doesn't need to be declared; if you ever watched tv you have watched (and enjoyed) Family guy. It doesn't need to be praised and rarely is, even by subcultures influenced by Family Guy.
Many people who claim to hate Family Guy will admit to liking it just alright when questioned, providing further evidence that most of the criticism that Family Guy has been subject to is mostly fabricated.
The relevancy of TV, in general, has declined. This has resulted in the decline of cultural influence that many shows used to have. But not Family Guy. There is a large group of individuals who spend their time uploading all sorts of Family Guy content on Youtube. Google suggests there are about 82 million results for Family Guy on Youtube. The Simpsons trail behind at 62 million despite being on air for 10 years longer, having more than double the episodes and similar ratings on television. South Park is at a measly 21 million. Most other shows have even fewer results, but it is generally accepted that they are less popular so it would be pointless to name them all here.
There are a large number of internet subcultures that are influenced by Family Guy. On every social platform, obscure references to Family Guy can be found, and because of the plurality of Family Guy humor, these aren't exclusive to a specific internet subculture. Most of these influences are subtle, and whereas other shows have their own declared forum or group, Family Guy humor has embedded itself into many subcultures, becoming an intrinsic part of the sense of humor within these groups (rather than just an influence from outside dependant on popularity). Even the Family Guy subreddit is a mish-mash of posts from a wide range of different internet subcultures. A stark difference with something like the Rick and Morty subreddit, which is CONFINED to its own subculture.
Despite being a leftoid Seth Mcfarlane has been getting away in Hollywood with making fun of ๐s, ๐s, ๐ณ๏ธโ๐s, and most importantly, mayos. And he has been doing so in a manner much more subtle, funny, and consistent than South Park, a show which gets praised for "making fun of everyone" despite having a clear bias in almost every episode (this does not mean there is no bias present in any of the Family Guy episodes or jokes, we are simply pointing out that biases in Family Guy are incidental and dependant on the episode whereas biases in South Park are structural).
Other shows (animated and non-animated alike) flat-out refuse to make fun of certain groups, especially their own. Seth McFarlane is comfortable making fun of leftoids and owning up to them being part of his own group. Other shows might appear to make fun of their own group, but it often becomes clear that they cannot resist the need to put disclaimers and exclude themselves from the group they are making fun of. Because of this, the comedy of Family Guy has much more integrity which contributes to its social relevancy. Jokes on family guy have more potential to become objective humor, as opposed to the circlejerk humor that's present in The Simpsons or South Park (which confines the influence of these shows to their own target audience)
The humor of Family Guy that is influenced by partisan politics is limited in frequency, confined to specific episodes, nuanced, and more morally ambiguous than in most other shows. Seth McFarlane has a self-admitted leftoid bias but his show still manages to stay relevant in rightoid spheres.
Some may say that Family Guy is only relevant because the show is stupid without realizing it, becoming what is essentially a laughing-stock. This doesn't affect its relevancy (as we explained in paragraph 3) however it is still wrong to suggest this. The show has sustained a "love to hate/mock/parody" relationship with a large portion of its viewers for such a long period of time that it is unlikely this suggestion bears any truth at all. Seth McFarlane has admitted to not liking Family Guy anymore, yet they still haven't changed how the show is written. The logical conclusion is that Family Guy is bad on purpose, and people that claim only enjoy the show in an ironic way simply don't realize that the show WAS MADE to be ironically enjoyed.
I myself have been attacked by a pit bull. It took my motherโs ear and almost killed her. But this is too far. That is just messed up. No matter your reasoning, never celebrate a loss of a pet. People are such jerks on the internet.
Either this is one of you, or this guy's got awful pattern recognition. God I hate furbabies
Sasanka_of_Gaudamaha/raja
Hypermuscular Hindu Beast
W 2yr ago#443007
Edited None
spent 0 currency on pings
Yeah this lion only dragged off Grug and Greg, I'll be fine it's probably full for no-
AAARGHHH
And this is how this story of an mentally ill individual would have ended in a just world. Civilization and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
Now_and_KlenShe/Her
Frick you, that's my name!
2yr ago#442033
Edited None
spent 0 currency on pings
It's sad when rightwingers die of the coof because they're innocent victims of a terrible plague but good when shitbulls die because they're scum and they deserve it.
RPDfefi/fofum
Learning not to huff baby boomer farts
The_Homocracy 2yr ago#444592
Edited None
spent 0 currency on pings
After you've recovered from the first infection of course. Theoretically, it would be funny if there was a super-deadly variant of Covid with say a 10% death rate, since it would actually be worth trying to get infected with the old variant (over being vaccinated) to reduce the likelihood of getting the new deadlier variant.
The_HomocracyCute/Twink
๐ฃ๐ฑ๐ฎ ๐ฐ๐ช๐ ๐ช๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ท๐ญ๐ช ๐ฒ๐ผ ๐ท๐ธ ๐ต๐ธ๐ท๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ธ๐น๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ธ๐ท๐ช๐ต
RPD 2yr ago#444675
Edited 2yr ago
spent 0 currency on pings
That would be funny because it would kill everybody but vaxxed that had Covid before. According to the study, having a previous infection and getting vaxxed conferred the highest level of protection against the coof.
RPDfefi/fofum
Learning not to huff baby boomer farts
The_Homocracy 2yr ago#444876
Edited None
spent 0 currency on pings
I'm sure being vaxxed on top of already being infected would offer even more protection.
But if you're vaxxed in the first place without having had Covid19 first, then you're potentially missing out on the opportunity to be better protected in that theoretical case I gave, since you're less likely to catch Covid19. Ironically, it would be better to be unvaxxed so you could catch Covid19, and THEN get vaccinated afterwards.
PatriceOneale/acc
We went to a musical called "Oh Africa, Brave Africa". It was a laugh riot.
Buck 2yr ago#442400
Edited None
spent 0 currency on pings
Unironicdramadebaterthey/them
I need a strong woman to love me
2yr ago#442249
Edited None
spent 0 currency on pings
More proof these people are mentally Ill and not fit to he members of society. All of these people who place dog lives above people are all just animals themselves that shouldnt be able to vote on national issues.
TheFatControllerchoo/chooo
get away from xer you bitxh
2yr ago#442063
Edited None
spent 0 currency on pings
I think I'm better than the r*dditors, but I'm trying to figure out what makes me different from them, because I like cute pibbles more than rightoids.
When I was a kid I witnessed my butthole creepy uncle hanging his German Shepherd repeatedly by her leash. She was the sweetest dog despite this.
Fast forward to me in my 20s home on leave from the Army. Found out he molested my brother. I got to whip his butt for my brother and that poor dog. I wanted to hang him.
That was 40 years ago and him abusing that dog is burned into my soul. Pissed now thinking of it and my Shepard and Malinois came up to lay with me.
Why do Redditors always feel the need to "share" (AKA LARP) about random bullshit that's not even relevant to the thread?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
B-but now the sweet pibble won't be able to give sweet kisses to cats, small dogs and toddlers.
Also if you don't collar your dog, you're not even doing the very minimum of responsible pet ownership. Your dog deserves to suffer for your bad choices.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Preach brother
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I pissed my pants a little bit laughing at this.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I havenโt laughed that hard in a while. Thank you
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
From the moment it premiered Family Guy has been relevant and it has never stopped being relevant ever since. It is the only show that consistently managed to keep up with the development of humor; from inventing the word "normie" in 2000 (influencing chan culture), to Peter Griffin grinding his gears (influencing millennial advice animal memes), to Quagmire potty (influencing surreal humor). There is an entire Tumblr subculture that swaps the faces of family characters on other ones (something that the makers of the show themselves started as well). The plurality of the comedy deployed by the writers ensures that almost every demographic gets to enjoy Family Guy. It has been pointed out that even post-ironicism has been greatly influenced by Family Guy, with proponents of this theory specifically pointing to the "Peter Griffin explains" meme which is a direct reference to a similar joke made on Family Guy.
There is a severe lack of culturally relevant references produced by other shows. Take The Simpsons, some would point to sneed (1999) or reaction images (all of which have been around since 9gag). We can rightfully point out that almost all Simpson references are old and outdated. Most other shows don't fare well in cultural relevancy either; you will almost never see a reference to Bojack Horseman, American Dad, or Bob's Burgers. I could list more but most of these shows are even less relevant than the Chinese cartoons enjoyed by weeaboos. Even a bigger show like Rick and Morty stopped being relevant after 2018 when their trademarked pickle joke became stale. South Park which is praised by many rightoids is only relevant in select rightoid spaces. And despite being written by a leftoid, Family Guy still manages to PERFORM BETTER with rightoids.
Enjoying family guy "ironically" or "loving to hate" the show still counts towards its entertainment plurality and its cultural relevancy.
Many of the criticisms of Family Guy are often poorly substantiated and come from a trend present specifically in millennials and gen-x individuals; the trend to "hate" a certain piece of entertainment for the sake of hating it. A similar phenomenon could be witnessed with the Star Wars prequels, which were hated in the mid-2000s and early 2010s but are now miraculously beloved (often by the same people who hated them at first). We should therefore not confuse genuine criticism with influenced criticism, in this case, influenced by a particular trend that originated in mid-2000s internet culture. The embodiment of that "trend" being the multi-part episode "Cartoon Wars" released by South Park in 2006; which criticized family guy but lacked any real substance to said criticism. It has been pointed out by Trey Parker himself that the fact that the majority of Hollywood hated Family Guy in the mid-2000s can partially be attributed to JEALOUSY reasons regarding its high ratings.
Almost everyone is casually invested in family guy, not as self-declared "fans" like many of the aforementioned shows; liking Family Guy isn't even seen as an interest. People call themselves "Rick and Morty-" or "South Park fans", but no one calls themselves a Family Guy fan. This is because liking Family Guy is the status quo. It doesn't need to be declared; if you ever watched tv you have watched (and enjoyed) Family guy. It doesn't need to be praised and rarely is, even by subcultures influenced by Family Guy.
Many people who claim to hate Family Guy will admit to liking it just alright when questioned, providing further evidence that most of the criticism that Family Guy has been subject to is mostly fabricated.
The relevancy of TV, in general, has declined. This has resulted in the decline of cultural influence that many shows used to have. But not Family Guy. There is a large group of individuals who spend their time uploading all sorts of Family Guy content on Youtube. Google suggests there are about 82 million results for Family Guy on Youtube. The Simpsons trail behind at 62 million despite being on air for 10 years longer, having more than double the episodes and similar ratings on television. South Park is at a measly 21 million. Most other shows have even fewer results, but it is generally accepted that they are less popular so it would be pointless to name them all here.
There are a large number of internet subcultures that are influenced by Family Guy. On every social platform, obscure references to Family Guy can be found, and because of the plurality of Family Guy humor, these aren't exclusive to a specific internet subculture. Most of these influences are subtle, and whereas other shows have their own declared forum or group, Family Guy humor has embedded itself into many subcultures, becoming an intrinsic part of the sense of humor within these groups (rather than just an influence from outside dependant on popularity). Even the Family Guy subreddit is a mish-mash of posts from a wide range of different internet subcultures. A stark difference with something like the Rick and Morty subreddit, which is CONFINED to its own subculture.
Despite being a leftoid Seth Mcfarlane has been getting away in Hollywood with making fun of ๐s, ๐s, ๐ณ๏ธโ๐s, and most importantly, mayos. And he has been doing so in a manner much more subtle, funny, and consistent than South Park, a show which gets praised for "making fun of everyone" despite having a clear bias in almost every episode (this does not mean there is no bias present in any of the Family Guy episodes or jokes, we are simply pointing out that biases in Family Guy are incidental and dependant on the episode whereas biases in South Park are structural).
Other shows (animated and non-animated alike) flat-out refuse to make fun of certain groups, especially their own. Seth McFarlane is comfortable making fun of leftoids and owning up to them being part of his own group. Other shows might appear to make fun of their own group, but it often becomes clear that they cannot resist the need to put disclaimers and exclude themselves from the group they are making fun of. Because of this, the comedy of Family Guy has much more integrity which contributes to its social relevancy. Jokes on family guy have more potential to become objective humor, as opposed to the circlejerk humor that's present in The Simpsons or South Park (which confines the influence of these shows to their own target audience)
The humor of Family Guy that is influenced by partisan politics is limited in frequency, confined to specific episodes, nuanced, and more morally ambiguous than in most other shows. Seth McFarlane has a self-admitted leftoid bias but his show still manages to stay relevant in rightoid spheres.
Some may say that Family Guy is only relevant because the show is stupid without realizing it, becoming what is essentially a laughing-stock. This doesn't affect its relevancy (as we explained in paragraph 3) however it is still wrong to suggest this. The show has sustained a "love to hate/mock/parody" relationship with a large portion of its viewers for such a long period of time that it is unlikely this suggestion bears any truth at all. Seth McFarlane has admitted to not liking Family Guy anymore, yet they still haven't changed how the show is written. The logical conclusion is that Family Guy is bad on purpose, and people that claim only enjoy the show in an ironic way simply don't realize that the show WAS MADE to be ironically enjoyed.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
K
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
This is King of the Hill erasure.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
South park will always be better.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They've placed a wrong bet on 2016 election, which ruined them spiritually and made them lose their magic powers
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Wrong
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Based
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Either this is one of you, or this guy's got awful pattern recognition. God I hate furbabies
Don't forget to turn off signatures in settings!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Almost killing my mother I could handle but eating a new baby is going a step too far!
-redditors
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
And this is how this story of an mentally ill individual would have ended in a just world. Civilization and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
RIP sweet baby. I'll feed mine an extra toddler in your memory.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It's sad when rightwingers die of the coof because they're innocent victims of a terrible plague but good when shitbulls die because they're scum and they deserve it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The unvaccinated are more innocent than the vaccinated because they haven't let themselves be pumped full of devil juice.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is why I'm pro-covid
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I saw a study recently that showed having Covid19 a first time provided much better immunity against newer covid variants than having the jab.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Cool story r-slur
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
After you've recovered from the first infection of course. Theoretically, it would be funny if there was a super-deadly variant of Covid with say a 10% death rate, since it would actually be worth trying to get infected with the old variant (over being vaccinated) to reduce the likelihood of getting the new deadlier variant.
Since it does indeed offer better immunity than the vaccine.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That would be funny because it would kill everybody but vaxxed that had Covid before. According to the study, having a previous infection and getting vaxxed conferred the highest level of protection against the coof.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm sure being vaxxed on top of already being infected would offer even more protection.
But if you're vaxxed in the first place without having had Covid19 first, then you're potentially missing out on the opportunity to be better protected in that theoretical case I gave, since you're less likely to catch Covid19. Ironically, it would be better to be unvaxxed so you could catch Covid19, and THEN get vaccinated afterwards.
Arms races are funny things.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Sure and being vaxxed is still better then no vax, in all cases.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
In that theoretical case I gave, only AFTER getting Covid-19 first.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Yeah but who makes money off that arrangement?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I almost wanna use masstagger or something and see the overlap of HCA posters on there.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I see a pibble on the road, I speed up. Simple as.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Whatโs the ideal rpm youโd say?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Redline + 200.
If you aren't bouncing off the governor, you aren't doing it right.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I hate redditors
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
And they call democrats triggerlywhatevers
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Pit bulls are my ideal pet. I hate kids, pit bulls are hardy with minimal health problems, and you can get them at shelters.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
ESH. Their dog shouldnโt have fricked around and found out the consequences.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
https://old.reddit.com/r/awfuleverything/comments/q404n8/rbanpitbulls_hoping_someones_lost_dog_gets_hit_by/hfxa91i/?sort=controversial
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More proof these people are mentally Ill and not fit to he members of society. All of these people who place dog lives above people are all just animals themselves that shouldnt be able to vote on national issues.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I think I'm better than the r*dditors, but I'm trying to figure out what makes me different from them, because I like cute pibbles more than rightoids.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Those little guys are totally adorable. Just have to make sure you put them down in the next two or three months.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It's the perfect camouflage - some children will get closer and open themselves up to an ambush instead of running away.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
If God didnt want pibbles to nibble toddlers, why did he make them so tasty?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Why do Redditors always feel the need to "share" (AKA LARP) about random bullshit that's not even relevant to the thread?
Utterly disgusting.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Pitbulls are exactly like black people: fricking awesome
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
https://old.reddit.com/r/BanPitBulls/comments/q0x0pi/10321_1_year_old_dies_ohio_while_in_the_home_with/?sort=controversial
Like clockwork, the pro pitbull posts happen right after a mauling
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
O say can you shart, in the local Walmart?
What so proudly expelled from anus' last leaking
Whose broad streaks and brown stars through the perilous blight
O'er the aisles we watched shit, gallantly streaming
And mutts nappy hair, negroes everywhere
Give proof that our race is 56% disgrace
O say, does that shiet-spangled bummer yet cut
O'er the land of the shart and the home of the mutt
Snapshots:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context