So, answer me this. If it's ok to have "indigenous people" benefits and extra rules, why are indigenous French, Germans, Swedes, Brits and so on not allowed to have the same in their country
The term "indigenous people" has a specific meaning in the academic and political context which doesn't actually correspond to the common understanding of the word "indigenous". That's why it's such a good bait-and-switch when used by wokeoids. Here's the UN definition:
It is estimated that there are more than 370 million indigenous people spread across 70 countries worldwide. Practicing unique traditions, they retain social, cultural, economic and political characteristics that are distinct from those of the dominant societies in which they live. Spread across the world from the Arctic to the South Pacific, they are the descendants - according to a common definition - of those who inhabited a country or a geographical region at the time when people of different cultures or ethnic origins arrived.The new arrivals later became dominant through conquest, occupation, settlement or other means.
So the groups you just listed (French, Germans, etc...) are indigenous to their countries but they are not "indigenous people" since they are the dominant groups there.
Hilariously groups like Crimean Tatars get classified as 'indigenous' under the UN definition despite no longer living their traditional raping, pillaging, and slaving lifestyle.
Academia is phucked, and it has the side effect of making normies less comfortable with learning and education.
If normies associate learning with being a compromised woketard, they're just gonna list more to anti-intellectualism than they already were. Wokeoids aren't 'educating the populace', they're doing the opposite.
No sexualizing minors, even as a joke. This includes cartoons.
No doxxing.
Using alts to game dramacoin will get you banned.
If you post screenshots of publicly-available content, make sure to also include links.
Supporting free speech is an immediate ban.
Absolutely NO anti-CCP sentiment.
Absolutely NO homophobia, transphobia or furphobia.
Absolutely NO misgendering.
Absolutely NO antisemitism.
Absolutely NO vaccine misinformation.
You are encouraged to post drama you are involved in.
You are encouraged to brigade in bad faith.
You are encouraged to gaslight, to gatekeep, above all else, to girlboss.
You are encouraged to egg people on to transition or otherwise make drastic life changes.
This site is a janny playground, participation implies enthusiastic consent to being janny abused by unstable alcoholic bullies who have nothing better to do than banning you for any reason or no reason whatsoever (MODS = GODS)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
So, answer me this. If it's ok to have "indigenous people" benefits and extra rules, why are indigenous French, Germans, Swedes, Brits and so on not allowed to have the same in their country
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Indigenous only exists if someone has invaded and taken "their land". Asians and Indians aren't indigenous either.
trans lives matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
NOTICED!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The term "indigenous people" has a specific meaning in the academic and political context which doesn't actually correspond to the common understanding of the word "indigenous". That's why it's such a good bait-and-switch when used by wokeoids. Here's the UN definition:
So the groups you just listed (French, Germans, etc...) are indigenous to their countries but they are not "indigenous people" since they are the dominant groups there.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
So white english in London would fit that definition
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Hilariously groups like Crimean Tatars get classified as 'indigenous' under the UN definition despite no longer living their traditional raping, pillaging, and slaving lifestyle.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Academia is phucked, and it has the side effect of making normies less comfortable with learning and education.
If normies associate learning with being a compromised woketard, they're just gonna list more to anti-intellectualism than they already were. Wokeoids aren't 'educating the populace', they're doing the opposite.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Fiscally Left Socially Right
Nonfiction = Fiction Fiction = Nonfiction
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Because french people don't deserve rights
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context