Female coomer book writer tried to relase coomer book named after hitler youth slogan in 4/20

Greene was born on June 28, 1934, in Memphis, Tennessee[1] to Arthur Evensky and Sadie (née Steinberg), but was raised in the small city of Parkin, Arkansas, where her parents ran the general store. Her maternal grandparents were Hyman and Tillie Steinberg who had a successful general store in Wynne, Arkansas.[2][3] As a Jewish girl in a town of Christian fundamentalists, she experienced discrimination and learned what it was like to be an outsider. Since her parents spent a lot of time in their store, Greene was raised mainly by her family's African-American housekeeper, Ruth, who was Greene's model for the character of the same name in Greene's debut novel, Summer of My German Soldier (1973).

Fricking shit why didn't they just put it in a panel?

This is unironically the most beautiful love story ever written !followers please watch until the end

Further I got before was to some point in an apartment where she drinks from a bowl, some point after the teeth breaking

>Ur insight is super valid and interesting!

Whats wrong with her nails?

Also:

Cuanto necesita para vivir bien en Uruguay con hijos?

Hola, perdon, español no es mi lengua materna.

Soy uruguaya por parte de padre. Estoy pensando en mudarme y mi hijo a Uruguay desde Eeuu y tengo preguntas.

Primero, cuánto necesita para vivir bien en Montevideo? Hablando en usd $. Trabajo remote y gano dinero en usd.

Otra cosa, soy madre soltera y joven para ser madre. quiero saber como tratan a la gente asi en uruguay? Hay mucho estigma?

También ya lo sé que a la gente aca le gusta hablar de lo malo bajo Estes posts. Entiendo que Uruguay tiene muchos problemas. No tengo mis ojos cerrados. Cada país tiene sus cosas feas y hermosas.

Gracias 🫶🏽

lolololo

español no es mi lengua materna.

Soy uruguaya

!latinx

Checked the wikipedo page, surprise surprise,

it's all chairo r-slurs putting bullshit without good attribution "according to this guy who was on the losing side..."

60,000, which is stated in the lead seems to come from a Mexican newspaper's editorial page which is not valid source

there was terrorism in South American countries and this was part of the pretext of at least some of the coups, although left-leaning commentators like to ignore this completely.

The article makes numerous claims about US involvement without sources and even has a map claiming this. When a source is used, it is an unsourced Communist newspaper. An attempt was made to correct but was reverted without explanation.

Iminsbila, I just finished reading the Calloni article, which is why I'm here--using the Wikipedia article's references to find more info on the subject. Calloni's article lacks reliable footnotes, which is surprising because she is an experienced journ*list. She uses footnotes extensively, but nothing lines up... for example she discusses Condor's role in the assassination of Carlos Partas. The footnote has nothing to do with Carlos Partas. Irregardless of this, Calloni is a highly biased source. She is pro-Castro, pro-Chavez, anti-(anything estadounidense). The wiki article over-relies on her. Additionally the Wiki article like Calloni's "Archivos del Horror del Operativo Cóndor" article places much blame for what happened on the US...but fails to connect anything to the US. The "proofs" that both use are reports from the US State Department describing Operation Condor. That's not the same as participation. They collected information and intelligence and reported it back to Washington in a neutral manner. Don't blame the messenger. Journ*lists write of terrible atrocities every day. But that's not to say that the journ*lists are responsible for the atrocities.

Calloni, like many of her contemporaries have a tendency to "blame the messenger," instead of acknowledging the fact that unfortunately since se independizaron de España, Latin American countries have almost always had terrible, corrupt, and murderous leaders. The actions of the dictators (right and left) are to blame. I know it's tough to swallow but coup followed by golpe followed by coup has shown that Latin American countries have had shitty rulers

The number of dead from Operation Condor, seems way too high. For example up to 20,000 may have died under Videla and perhaps 3,000 under Pinochet prior to to Condor beginning. So where does the other 40,000+ come from. It seems unlikely that the dictatorships of Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay murdered anywhere near that many people. It definitely seem way too high. Does anyone have any breakdown of how many are supposed to have died in each of different countries. I have never heard of mass killing in any of the southern cone countries bar Argentina and Chile, so it does seem way too high

Anon editor: It is not sufficient to remove sourced the statement regarding the estimate of the number of deaths. You need to add the contradictory evidence and sources for the "modern estimates" you mention. Bagunceiro (talk) 23:10, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

See the main pages regarding Stroessner, Pinochet, Videla and the other involved juntas. The modern estimates for people killed during their regimes is far lower than the mentioned Condor estimate. This doesn't take into account that many of these deaths are before Condor and even the ones during Condor are not necessarily part of Condor. It is fairly obvious that 60,000 people were not killed. For example modern estimates for Pinochet are 1,200 to 3,200 with 3 quarters in 1973. The rest is not necessarily part of Condor. 10,000 to 30,000 under the Argentine junta from all violence not just Condor. A few thousand under Stroessner and he was in power long before. The rest of the Juntas are accused of hundreds of deaths each if not a bit more.79.75.116.68 (talk) 17:03, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

No, it simply won't do to just delete a fully sourced item. It is by no means "obvious" that these sources are wrong or that the arIf you have contrary evidence then include it with references.