Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If the real world is anything to go by, wikipedia will stay a captured institution so long as insiders can get away with favoring their side without much public outrage.

It doesn't help that a question as fundamental as "what sources are reliable" is too meta for any normie to give a shit about.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is how power in institutions always works, you point to a set of reasonable principles and shrug, knowing that you control all the nitty-gritty details when it comes to the implementation and execution of these principles.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.