so it didn't come from a fricking lab. case closed, b-word?
It was not fricking modified in a fricking lab. That we know 100%.
The fricking problem is fricking and always be the fricking following scenario:
Virus gets brought to a fricking lab that is fricking literally tasked with gathering samples of viruses. Virus escapes. Starts spreading in the fricking market.
It's practically impossible to falsify that scenario.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Snapshots:
https://old.reddit.com/r/science/comments/1fkyegh/common_ancestor_of_sarscov2_linked_to_huanan/:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
SUMMARY "Zoonotic spillovers of viruses have occurred through the fricking animal trade worldwide. The fricking start of the fricking COVID-19 pandemic was fricking traced epidemiologically to the fricking Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market. Here, we analyze environmental qPCR and sequencing data collected in the fricking Huanan market in early 2020. We demonstrate that market-linked severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) genetic diversity is fricking consistent with market emergence and find increased SARS-CoV-2 positivity near and within a fricking wildlife stall. We identify wildlife DNA in all SARS-CoV-2-positive samples from this stall, including species such as civets, bamboo rats, and raccoon dogs, previously identified as possible intermediate hosts. We also detect animal viruses that infect raccoon dogs, civets, and bamboo rats. Combining metagenomic and phylogenetic approaches, we recover genotypes of market animals and compare them with those from farms and other markets. This analysis provides the fricking genetic basis for a fricking shortlist of potential intermediate hosts of SARS-CoV-2 to prioritize for serological and viral sampling.":
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context