Ethics:marseysoylentgrin: Strags piss and shid themselves when a sigma Stacey :gigachadqueen: cures her own cancer without a loycence :marseybongcop:

https://x.com/alanlparker/status/1831717051951460457

the longhouse doesn't even let women do cool shit :marseyeyeroll: and all "ethicists" should be shot into the ocean they don't ever even say a real objection just "the ethics are troubleing :soycry:" or some vague shit like that.

151
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think the main concern isn't she saved herself/did it to her self but if the journal accepts her article, it tacitly approves on self experimentation which will encourage a bunch of r-slurs and schizos to try on themselves and end up giving themselves aids.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Researchers should be allowed to give themselves AIDS if they want. You can't put limits on science.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It kinda skews because people already do unsavory things like abuse underlings and lie about data just to get published in top journals. You could imagine a repeat of that Korean grad student abuse case but now with self experiment.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Bro no way I just finished this two part video twenty minutes ago.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I turned myself into a vegetable, Morty!

:marseybeanpickletalking#:


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17270378440055554.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyautism: look another vegetable :#marseypoint2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They are but this is probably to prevent r-slurred uni freshmen on top of kruger effect from killing themselves

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

We shouldn't prevent that kind of thing

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

r-slurs harming themselves is always more ethical than them harming someone else, so I don't see the problem

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think the issue is that there are a bunch of rules for doing research on other people

If we let scientists just inject themselves with whatever they might turn invisible or smth

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>I think the issue is that there are a bunch of rules for doing research on other people

which are also incredibly r-slurred. The incredibly costly worldwide covid lockdowns could've easily been prevented by human experimentation.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Or exacerbated

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

no

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Couldn't COVID be worse if they were openly and excessively testing on humans in the Wuhan lab?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The people here are too r-slurred to reason this many steps ahead.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.