Ethics Strags piss and shid themselves when a sigma Stacey cures her own cancer without a loycence

I hate women, but self-testing experimental stuff is based old-school science, so I approve

it was a 2.5-year battle with different reviewers and editors from 13 different journals...

The principal reason for all these rejections was the concern on ethical issues.

I'm delighted the subject is well, but the ethical dimensions are very troubling: Ethics of self admin, her own doctors, the reagents used, the funding, the institutional oversight, the journal publishing the work. Where to begin?

I am not commenting on the ethics here - just that this will be a challenging one medical ethicists

Safetyism now says its unethical to survive

She's curing her breast cancer in bad faith!

DIY cancer treatment

>NOOO THE HECKING ETHICS

DIY gender transition

>Yasss go off queen

I think the main concern isn't she saved herself/did it to her self but if the journal accepts her article, it tacitly approves on self experimentation which will encourage a bunch of r-slurs and schizos to try on themselves and end up giving themselves aids.

noooo dont treat your breast cancer just work and die

If this is an ethical minefield then ethics is a field that deserves to be mined.

How does ethics even come into curing your own cancer? That's fricking r-slurred.

I heard a take once that it was unethical to transplant a new arm onto an amputee because you go from having a healthy patient with one arm to a sick patient with two arms who will be on medication for the rest of their life. Like b-word frick you, I want two arms.

If only every woman was this keyed.

Professional Ethicicists are really just Capital Rights Propagandists. They only ever advocate for the political rights of businesses/capital. Ethicist is a title mainly found in corporate/NGO(corporate) settings, seldom even found in academia, with exception for universities that function like holding groups (princeton, harvard, etc). They dont call themselves ethical philosophers, or people of a particular political pursuasion, and linguistically assert themselves as arbitors of absolute morality. To clarify Im not defending moral relativism, but claiming to hold the answers to absolute morality in all things is usually an activity done by fundie american christians.

CIA psyop to give 1 in 10 doctors a fatal disease at random to see whether it increases new medical cure discovery rates

Hey everyone! My name is Juan-Elias Riesco, my mom and I own Nini's Deli together, and before I gave my life to Jesus Christ, I used to be a homosexual.

I still remember the day as if it was yesterday when my older brother Jose shared the Good News of Jesus with me and told me that I was on a path of destruction without Christ. I thank God that he did not sugar coat it, because it was his forthrightness that struck a cord heart. After that moment I was immediately convicted for my sins, and just a few months later I went to church and cried out for Jesus' mercy over my life!

Now, I am married to the woman of my dreams and we have two precious children together (and Lord willing many more). It is because of this that I as a business owner now have such a big heart for my #LGBTQ friends. If Christ could change me, surely He can change anyone!

Snapshots:

https://x.com/alanlparker/status/1831717051951460457:

• ghostarchive.org

• archive.org

• archive.ph (click to archive)

Her body her choice but literally and unironically.

You just know these "ethicists" that are hemming and hawing about this are fully pro-choice but only when it comes to pre-approved beliefs.

This woman doesn't need an ethics review, she needs to be given a lab to develop this even more.

Experimenting on yourself is probably the most ethical thing anyway.

A woman cannot be sigma lol

This is why they want vaxed against everything

I read two seconds of the article and gave up, I aint doing university research or readings again.

>I don't care that you, as a woman, consented to get vaxxed by some weird stuff. It's heckin UNETHICAL and HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION

>It is important to emphasize that virus preparations were of research grade and of complex biological composition, considering that purification of viruses from host–cell components was not performed. These impurities could also affect the overall outcome of the described protocol. Two cell lines, MRC-5 and Vero, both regulatory acceptable and widely in use for the upstream processing of human viral vaccines [20], were used for the laboratory-grade virus production.

Ok, after reading some more, this woman put un-purified virus prep into her tumor. I can't tell if this is even more based or if it's r-slurred. If it were me, I'd probably have tried to clean it up some more.

God darn this is based hfs

Barry Marshall must be spinning in his grave so fast he's gonna take off.