Ethics:marseysoylentgrin: Strags piss and shid themselves when a sigma Stacey :gigachadqueen: cures her own cancer without a loycence :marseybongcop:

https://x.com/alanlparker/status/1831717051951460457

the longhouse doesn't even let women do cool shit :marseyeyeroll: and all "ethicists" should be shot into the ocean they don't ever even say a real objection just "the ethics are troubleing :soycry:" or some vague shit like that.

151
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

it was a 2.5-year battle with different reviewers and editors from 13 different journals...

The principal reason for all these rejections was the concern on ethical issues.


I'm delighted the subject is well, but the ethical dimensions are very troubling: Ethics of self admin, her own doctors, the reagents used, the funding, the institutional oversight, the journal publishing the work. Where to begin?


I am not commenting on the ethics here - just that this will be a challenging one medical ethicists

Safetyism now says its unethical to survive

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Remember, experimenting on yourself is unethical, but administering a dangerous pharma product to millions of people while suppressing all evidence of efficacy and having the government, media, and scientific establishment repeat talking points about the urgency of taking it is Safe And Effective

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What are you talking about

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He's promoting dangerous malinformation about the vaxx because he hates old people and fat people

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Vaccine misinformation on my rdramadotnet?

It's more likely than u think

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think we would be out of the solar system by now without these useless eaters in academia cuckholding the actual researchers.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

very likely

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

they really are the worst people, and shockingly stupid.

a budy of mine works at a research hospital doing grants and biostatistics and every day he has a new story about r-slurred butt phd researchers that like aren't normal humans socially, nor can they do very basic stuff.

one of them was a breast cancer researcher writing a paper on breast cancer treatment and didn't know some basic aspect of it, he asked her several times and she just kept saying she didn't know. I told him to look up her published work and she was a fricking co author on a paper discussing the very treatment he was asking her about, it's like her brain was blank.

he went from being rabidly pro academia to thinking they're all r-slurred while working there. and these are doctors, I can't imagine how bad it is outside of the hard sciences.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Modern research is still very new. Near all progress was made by nobility and clergy who had the assurance and confidence to just DO SOMETHING and the time and money already secured so monied interests while still present was far less so. Copyright only cane about in the 18th/19th century.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Co-authorship is given out as a favor, it's literally a circlejerk. A friend gives you co-authorship to get your name on more papers, you give them co-authorship back, so on and so forth.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's shockingly easy to get co-authorship by ingratiating yourself to the right people.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If you are willing to do your own research and not rely on the lame stream media, you will find that it's already happened. The people who went on the Titan submarine were not in fact killed in an explosion but instead teleported themselves to a new colony on Beta Century

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Academics is built on climbing the ladder, enslaving younger reseachers to do all the work, claim the reseach and then kick it down so no one else can succeed.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Stop making academia sound so cool

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Its so much worse in the humanities where its just a small clique trying to keep their meal ticket by only allowing other grifters in.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>The principal reason for all these rejections was the concern on ethical issues.

:#soyjakfrontneutraltalking:

>Ethics of self admin, her own doctors, the reagents used, the funding, the institutional oversight, the journal publishing the work. Where to begin?

:#soysmugtalking:

>I am not commenting on the ethics here - just that this will be a challenging one medical ethicists

:#smugjaktalking:

see how they just vaguepost. B-word your JOB is supposed to be ethics at the very least say what your ethical objection is.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I am not commenting on the ethics here (actually I did. I just am refusing to elaborate in any way)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>barge into the ethics committee

>"This research is unethical and may not proceed"

>refuse to elaborate

>leave with emeritus appointment

:#gigachad4:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

And after all that time I spent drawing the cowtopus on the whiteboard?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseychemist2: I consent!

:marseychemist2: I also consent because I'm the same person!

:taylorlorenzcrying: :marseywomanmoment2: We don't!

Is there someone(s) you forgot to ask? :marseydisagree:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I am not commenting on the Portuguese people here, I am just saying they will be a challenging people for Europe

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

These same bedwetters want to give your 13 year old lupron.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Shut up chud. Don't you know its illegal to save yourself without government intervention.

:marseysmoothbrain:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>deal with the replication crisis

:#marseyno: this is not a concern

>promote ethicirinos

:#marseyagree: this is heckin unethical

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

But the replication crisis is due to the fact that people are acting unethically.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Give all these losers mega cancer, they either die or they invent their own treatment and hopefully will shut up about ethics after, win-win :soymad:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The issue with the ethics of this is that it's easy to misrepresent and mislead when you are both administering, studying and are the subject.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I agree with that, but if commenters had that specific issue in mind, they wouldn't have all written some variant of "wow... This is just so TOUGH guise :soycry: just wow. There's definitely an ethics in the vicinity"

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.