r/minnesota seethes as their largest newspaper won't endorse Kamala/Waltz, Waltz being their own governor! Weird! 
A couple of newspapers are deciding not to endorse a presidential candidate this year which has completely broken the minds of their audience, who they have been coddling and shaping the opinions of with their poorly sourced drivel for years, screwing their audience to a drooling r-slur, left-leaning semi-human. Papers have found out that endorsing a candidate is literally too on the nose and seeing as how no one trusts them are attempting to back peddle as their trust levels fall into despair. Now they are losing the audience they have cultivated for years because, like toddlers, if you don't give them everything they will through a tantrum and fling shit at your walls.
/r/minnesota literally can't face the reality that Kaham is just terrible 
/r/minnesota, within two posts are already delving into numerous conspiracy theories with regarding to the owner. My knowledge of Minnesota sports says he should sell all their sports teams cause they all fricking suck shit (except their WNBA team, they actually win! 
)
People admitting they actually read the OP-ED section when they don't realize they can skip that since the whole paper is an op-ed. 
I can assure you the only reason rural Minnesota would buy your newspaper is to stock up on fire starting material for winter.
"People" actually bought the "Democracy dies in the darkness" bullshit 
There's plenty more seething in the thread!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This kills the redditard.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The official account /u/star-tribune answered! https://old.reddit.com/r/minnesota/comments/1geci37/the_star_tribune_chose_not_to_endorse_a_candidate/lucqoij/?context=8
"opinion editor Phil Morris explained [..] By focusing on the issues, rather than telling people how they should vote, we hope to use the cowtools of opinion journ*lism in more empowering ways that add value to your voting experience .."
is this ...
actual journ*lism? 
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No, shes just that bad.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That, and also this editor seems to have a bit of intelligence left and not pick sides in an already happening train wreck. This might even resemble integrity. But it's probably just self preservation.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You know its not 100% she loses
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Of course. The train wreck currently happening is that everyone loses regardless of which party wins the presidency. It's all too opinionated. I'm a !grillers and I welcome any movement back to the ground of issues, which this opinion editor(!) proposes.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Ofc she is gonna win, rightoids are just loud online
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
This whole endorsement charade probably took the national share of trust in the news from 9% to 8% because 1% are libtards upset WaPo aren't endorsing Harris but they're the same r-slurs that think NPR is right wing so they're in
territory anyways
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I don't know. 409 redditors is a lot of people.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context