Unable to load image

Bernie Sanders agrees with Musk about slashing the Pentagon's budget. Redditors suddenly decide massive military spending is of utmost importance.

https://old.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/1h4bikk/bernie_sanders_agrees_with_elon_musk_on_slashing/?sort=new

								

								

Yeah, all those high paying civilian jobs will go away. That's smart

the fricking comments in the thread :marseyxd:

152
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17331245993581486.webp

"he will do blatantly obvious illegal thing". If you work as an advisor to the government that doesn't mean you can conspire to kill off competition and not have Justice Dept nootice :marseyeyeroll:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

what's funny :marseylaugh: is recently the ecommunist published an article about the VA being too generous https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2024/11/28/american-veterans-now-receive-absurdly-generous-benefits

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They can be extremely generous if you get approved for benefits. The wonky part is how they decide who gets approved for all the benefits

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They might as well say 'they both want to cut the budget but one wants to do it in bad faith'.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

When /r/politics posters want the government to cut spending on the military they expect the extra money to go towards gibs that benefit them like college loan forgiveness. This money will be used in bad faith so Redditors disapprove.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

he will do blatantly obvious illegal thing

The last decade ought to have repeatedly demonstrated to you that nothing actually happens when the executive branch does "blatantly obvious illegal thing".

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Last decade? More like since existence

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Emphasis on blatant. They used to at least put effort into maintaining a facade. Now they can barely even half-butt pretend they are held accountable for anything.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

true but he won't be part of the executive branch

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Dems know a huge part of their power is permanent unelected bureaucrats who can't be fired. Something like 70-90% of money allocated to a lot of government programs are eaten up by salary of people who's only job is to hold the line.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More dead Ziggers is good, actually.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Every dead zigger makes the world a better place

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The war in Ukraine is just to deplete both nations of the most slavs until all that remains is a husk shell anyways

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Is this what the patriots support now? Reducing military budget? US rightoids are so cucked now man can you guys get more pathetic than this

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Modern rightoids (incl myself) are fairly isolationist. I much prefer this to Bush-era jannying in other people's countries

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

bombs are dropped cause yall cant behave

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Did ron paul republicans wanting to end the world police shit

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I can't parse this sentence.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think . I can figure this one. Didn't Ron Paul republicans, wanted to end the world police shit.

My best guess

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

i feel like alot of rightoids began turning against the GWOT in bush's second term bc after Katrina gas prices went skyrocketing and the one stated benefit of fricking around over there was low gas prices(also there was no wmds). This lead to scrutiny which allowed for rhe rise of libertarian/ron paul/"zeitgest"/"america freedom to fascism" sentiments. This also caused fracturing in conservatism which arguably allowed for Obama's success. Then Obama continued all the worst of those forieng policies throighout his administration. Also under the Obama admin the worst implications of the patriot act/Bush's GWOT came to fruition with the wikileaks revelations and Snowden revealing the NSA spying lead to a strong anti-government anti-globalist sentiment among republicans. Which is why Drumpf ran on getting out of wars in 2016

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Reported by:

Historically the American right wing has always been against a standing army. Why is it in US interest to die or even spend money for polacks?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why is it in US interest to die or even spend money for polacks?

Chuds cannot have anything beyond a puddle-deep understanding of geopolitics istg

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Surely isolating and alienating yourself will help us become a greatest country on earth, just look at North Korea :marseyclueless:

Who needs military and alliances amirite

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Reported by:
  • HailVictory1776 : Why are we fighting yuropes wars for them when the EU was literally made so they support themselves

I don't understand why MAGAcels are so enthusiastic about shutting off allies and burning bridges. They really want to take all the work done with the Marshall Plan, NATO, all the trade deals an investments and throw them into a trash bin out of spite and in exchange of zero gains.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Agreed. It's imperative that we don't let Trump turn his back on Israel in its hour of need. :marseytroublemaker: !jidf

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Milkies for Israel.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17331500839801037.webp

!mommymilkers

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Pathetic. I've got so many hot asian chicks aged 65-75 in my binders, it would make your head spin.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'd inflate her portfolio with some insider trading :marseystocksupdown:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No offense but you two are seething provincials worried that the core will turn off the protection tap because they're bored of you. Framing it as "concern" about the core's standing when in reality it's your own standing you're worried about is silly. Be born in the centre next time tbh.

That said I am with you guys at how quick the pivot was from IR liberalism to straight up isolationism in the US but that tenent isn't exactly rare in the burger right. Think the people on top have to make the benefits of the "American Empire" more clear to your average burger rather than framing it in vague freedom and democracy terms.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm a global provincial, but my country is not at risk of being invaded and it doesn't even have US protection like Poland lol.

Think the people on top have to make the benefits of the "American Empire" more clear to your average burger rather than framing it in vague freedom and democracy terms.

That was my main point, I was referring not just security but rather the whole bulk of networks and tarde relationships the US created with Europe and the rest of the world after WW2 ended. Of course non-Americans are more concerned with their own countries (like any sane person would), that doesn't mean the US and it's industries, banks, and services sectors didn't benefit from said trade relationships (if not straight up foreign meddling in the case of some countries) because they did massively, and I agree is a though point to see to the average burger.

The end of the Cold War sort of made the right-wing retreat as the threat of communism vanished.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

right-wing retreat

I mean was it a retreat or was it a rout? Now the main "enemy" had disappeared rightoids took heavy beatings around a lot of the Western world during the 90s, especially in the Anglo countries. Some recovering by the middle of the decade some getting JUSTed well into the 00s.

Nevermind while said relationships and "meddling" may be good overall for the US it's not surprising a country which bills itself as the defender of freedom pauches at the more egregious forms of such to the point of overcorrection.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>im from chile

How far are you guys coming along with indoor plumbing?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The benefit is all the money, it's not a hard concept.

Preventing wars and keeping trade partners is more profitable than anything else

R-slurs also see whatever big military spend without realizing it all goes back into the economy anyway

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That needs to be made more clear to the average burger then though the latter point sounds like supply-side or "trickle down" economics which has been generally demonised in popular discourse so it may still not go over well then.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

military spending isn't exactly the same as it is often "trickle up", ie giving loads of r-slurs money to blow on cars to crash. Of course CEOs of weapon makers get a good chunk as well, but those companies do actually hire people and manufacture real things at the end of the day compared to hedge funds

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I shouldn't have to worry about my support being cut off when our country is paying our fair share and even a little above :marseyindignant:

I always valued strong military and think army spending is a necessity. And so I see reducing your military prowess as a foolish move, especially when you're the largest military in the world while the supposed "2nd strongest" has been getting too uppity and increasing their spending exponentially the past few years

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

you seem to have a lot of faith in how money is actually spent by the us government for 750 military bases around the world. surely all of it is done in the interests of national security, distrubuted by the smartest people.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Hey Americans, let's all listen to Poland on how to be a successful country, lmao.

>why would America weaken itself by not having the ultra terrifying forces of fricking Poland? Aren't they afraid of Russia like we are?!?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lmao. Maybe you should look into getting guns. Or did you let your govt take them?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They don't need guns, they need nursing homes and Muhammad's strong genetics to avoid the oncoming population collapse.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

Same for Biden and his supporters. :marseyshrug:

Voters tend to be anti-market.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Should the US be ruled by a Military Junta and just ignore the votercels? :marseypinochet:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>you know, your allies. The ones with no military and hate you for being insanely more productive than they are

Oh no what are we gonna do without our allies?!?! Who are we going to send all these neetbux to, China and India? Oh wait

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>comparing a tiny, landlocked, resource poor, literal half nation shithole, to resource rich, quasi empire that makes up roughly 60% of it's continental landmass, that can easily steamroll the entire hemisphere if it wanted to and has had that capability for almost 200 years.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17331687534227004.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"Not sending tax payer money to derelict city states filled with shitlib lazy losers is isolationism!" Lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

There's a difference between stopping being the world's policeman and becoming North Korea. There's room to pull back a bit. Not that I expect to agree with how far Trump decides to go with it, though.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"If no send gibs to europoors, world war 3, 4 and 5!"

Very deep.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What advantage does the extension of eastern Europe in NATO do for the US? Eastern Europe mostly just fuels the German industry, which is a competitor of the US economy.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

And here I always thought rightoids want to be a superpower but it seems they're content being puny b-words lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You seem kinda mad, and all im getting from you is "daddy us help me dont leave pls" vibes.

If you're important enough, you dont need to worry.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Modern rightoids are dull isolationist cucks. Just look at Britain's brexiteers, they went from being proud of the British Empire to being happy with a provincial little England. Peak mediocrity

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

seems they're content being puny b-words

That what a foid would say when the guy don't want to spend money on her.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

But what does being a superpower mean, if schools are deteriorating, industry rotting, and society pessimistic?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

actually, Polacks are really good at getting invaded :marseyindignant:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Cope, Republicans have been pushing towards isolationism for a while now.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm more confused as to why libs are suddenly huge supporters of the military industrial complex :marseyinsane:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I was always a supporter of a strong military :marseysalutearmy:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It costs the US 20-100k to fly a single military jet PER hour. you seem to have an extremely naive or clueless view of how govenment contracts work in the US. For the military especially, it's a textbook example of grift at extraordinarily high levels. https://www.yahoo.com/news/pentagon-fails-7th-audit-row-130419510.html

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I mean for Poland I'm sure. You guys just need a strong military for parades or w/e. Americans are used to watching three lifetimes of tax income get spent on a giant toy for some r-slur to drive in circles with in a desert across the world before it's giftwrapped and left for the Taliban.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

And that's bad because? :marseyconfused:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Your brain is cooked if you think your average center-right/rightoid loves the US military budget. It's overbloated as heck and subject to no oversight; unlike the rest of us that have to work directly beneath them and are subject to all the scrutiny in the world. The DoD does have a purpose and needs to exist, but simultaneously, frick the DoD. Audit it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Elon is in charge of efficiency, he wants to cut bloat not funding that is important

Whether he can decide that correctly I have no idea. He managed to do it at Twitter without too many major issues but the DoD is a totally different beast. Obviously if a social media site crashes it's less detrimental than fricking with the world's greatest military operations

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

We now spend more money paying interest on old debt(1.1 trillion) than we spend on any single discretionary items, including defense(900 billion). We spend more than anyone else, but we also are being out produced by the Russians in artillery shell production 10 to 1. They make 300k a month and we make 30k.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If we're not going to use the military to conquer our enemies or acquire new territory, we should cut costs and treat it as a defensive force. Anything else is just a huge waste of money. The return on investment is shit.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Frick war.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Pft military spending, more like protecting limp wristed Europe against le evil Russia.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Patriotism is whwn you spend a gorilla dolars to subsidize the shitty defenses of countries on the other side of the ocean

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyhorseshoe#:

Libs love the military and cons hate it now.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

High paying "civilian" jobs like giving union members heart attacks, staging coups and shredding documents of evidence of corruption

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wdym? :marseysad:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseymentalgymnastics: different "types" of budget cuts

:marseymentalgymnastics2: more like Musk agrees with Bernie

:marseygymnast: Bernie has always said this

:marseygymnast2: bad headline from…Rolling Stone?

:marseymentalgymnastics: why mention musk at all?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Remember when Dems were labeled anti-troops because they simply didn't want to increase military spending?

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17331507798190734.webp

Remember when Dems invited the Bush/Cheney ghouls who said that to leave the Republicans and support Democrats instead...and then holy shit it actually fricking happened? :marseypikachu2: :marseyxd:

https://media.tenor.com/e-GudjJkiAYAAAAx/veronica-mars-veronica-mars-season1.webp

!chuds and !nonchuds crossover episode! Last year's "war criminals" are this year's "right side of herstory!" :marseyprojection:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

BUSH IS A WAR CRIMINAL!

BUSH NEEDS TO ENDORSE KAMALA!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Defunding the pentagon sounded more sensible back when we weren't potentially facing WW3. Defunding anything related to national security at a point of heightened tension between basically all of our rivals sounds particularly r-slurred to me.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What WW3 neighbor? The closest we'll get to that is China-Taiwan and that shit will continue to receive funding.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If Russia goes hot on NATO there is zero chance the US manages to stay out of it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Or if its smaller we won't find the need to fight ww3.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You understimate the grip the US has over the world

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The bloated national security state is the one pulling us into ww3, just like they pulled us into a war in Ukraine.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Whatever you say, Andrei.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm 100% :marseyburger:

:#muttscooter:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Whatever you say, Cleetus.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No wonder that frickin r-slur commie Sanders is against a good big defense budget. Musk does it only because he clearly wants to become a contractor and rake in for himself the money

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The budget would have been used to pay contractors, no?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Correct. It would enrich him further as a contractor to inflate NASA and DoD budgets

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

But slashing the Pentagon budget is bad though? :marseysad:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Learn to code :marseynails:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I love the Military-industrial Complex so fricking much it's unreal!

:#speechbubble:.

:#chadleftoid:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

it is punk to enlist :marseyfellowkids:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

they love big-pharma ans big phosphate now too :sciencejak:

!slots100

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If Hitler crawled out of the ground and said, "Trump bad" he'd be on the cover of vanity fair and time

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm starting to wonder if Trump said "trans rights" how many Redditors would detransition? Maybe they could convert to radical Islam (but I repeat myself) since they love that ideology already.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More military bidget = more dead ziggers

Gotta pump up those numbers :marseyletsfuckinggo2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is because we keep printing money for other countries that is laundered back to companies that only want to hire sexy Indian dudes. If congress would you know actually fund domestic programs that help people directly like when hurricanes happen not other shit, like terrorists we will have to fight right after we fund them. Americans would probably more supportive in like in the past.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Remember when the redditor used to accuse the republicans of being the just oppose current democrat thing party, and we used to take it seriously?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

LMAO even the pentagon is like "For the love of god stop making us buy all these tanks"

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:!#marseymini: :#soysnoogenocide:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.