https://x.com/DanCrenshawTX/status/1869574803667181797
Yeah or maybe youβre a fucking lying piece of shit because Iβm not even on the YES list for the whip team. Never have been. But hey, whatever gets you pathetic bottom feeders your click bait. Fucking incels. https://t.co/nc0i3NwBub
— Dan Crenshaw (@DanCrenshawTX) December 19, 2024
Anonymous coward like βcatturdβ talking shit without any evidence. Iβm used to it. Sorry I was guy fighting the wars that little b-words like you would never dare to. One of us has actually served this country and continues to, while losers like you make money being trolls onβ¦
β Dan Crenshaw (@DanCrenshawTX) December 19, 2024
"What the frick did you just say about me, you little b-word..."
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Musk and the
are so rarted whining about corruption in one tweet and then saying Congress people should never get any money in the next.
Guess what kind of person wants to take a job with no money and lots of power?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Congressmen should be given a big payrise, but it should be illegal for them, their relatives, or associated entities to trade stock of any kind.
Also, after leaving office, they're not allowed to work in the private sector for a minimum of 1/3 of the years they were in office.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Do congressppl even make above average money off of stocks? I thought the Pelosi thing was just a meme
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Uh yeah they write laws that directly affect stock price and they can buy up companies prior to annoucing subsidies
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
literally 0 evidence of this
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
what? insider trading is explicitly legal for US politicians. they passed a law for that.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
surely there would be evidence
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
evidence that politicians get insider knowledge all the time? evidence that they trade on that knowledge?
since it's legal for them, there's no investigation, so if you're hoping for court records proving it:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Nancy Pelosi's husband's trades outperform Warren Buffett's
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
surely you are going to present evidence
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
https://finbold.com/warren-buffett-michael-burry-nancy-pelosi-which-stock-portfolio-has-the-best-performance/
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
bro im not going to click that link.
just give it to us in words
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Nancy pelosis and mitt romneys stocks suggest otherwise
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
surely you will present evidence
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
They do?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
A study from 2012-2022 said essentially no: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0047272722000044
Unusual whales claimed yes (for the average, although not everyone) for 2023: https://unusualwhales.com/politics/article/congress-trading-report-2023#pelosi-trading-again
Unusual whales tweets seem kinda r-slurred, so I don't know how much I trust them. But at any rate, doesn't seem like it's some incredible moneymaker for congressppl, compared to just using the S&P 500.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!commenters
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I don't know whether to be disappointed I didn't fall for it or be proud I didn't fall for it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Sadly the jannietype is the good outcome here. A congresscritter who just gets off on status and petty showboating in hearings is annoying, but better than the ones who are actively selling out the public, which is more likely.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
issue with parliament system in uk. mostly richies because they are only ones who can afford to get paid nothing.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I mean, you literally have a House of Lords... not to mention a king.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Are you r-slurred?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
YES
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
JimJim finally admits it!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
zoz
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
zle
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
zozzle
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context