Most Based Comments
Basedness: ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐
"How do you know capitalism works better than communism.""Look at history!""Ok, should we also look at history to see if monarchy works better than democracy?""NOOO!!!! No more looking at history!!!" (14)
r/RoyalismSlander Royalism was very successful historically. (-1)
Basedness: ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐๐
"How do you know capitalism works better than communism.""Look at history!""Ok, should we also look at history to see if monarchy works better than democracy?""NOOO!!!! No more looking at history!!!" (14)
The vast majority of human progress occurred under monarchs (-1)
Basedness: ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐๐
Are you talking about World War I, literally the most shameful event in the history of monarchy as an institution and the catalyst that caused most politically powerful monarchies to start crumbling world wide? (13)
Angriest Comments
Angriness: ๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก
"What in tarnation, by not ceding ground to Adolf Hitler, you triggered him to start a destructive war! What a shameful display to democracy (Hitler was democratically elected)!" (-1)
Angriness: ๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก๐
WW2, war of 1812, craziness during classical antiquity, Roman Republic etc.. (1)
Angriness: ๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก๐
With the new territories in the East... they would've been able to continue fighting. (1)
Biggest Lolcow: /u/Derpballz
Score: ๐ฎ๐ฎ๐ฎ๐ฎ๐
Number of comments: 23
Average angriness: ๐๐๐๐๐
Maximum angriness: ๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก๐
Minimum angriness: ๐๐๐๐๐
NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining! 
autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramneurodivergents. 
Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion 
.webp?h=10 "Nuzzles, pounces on you, UwU, you're so warm!..")
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The biggest issue with democracy that I'm frankly not sure how to overcome is that it is simply not a winning strategy to do things that will be beneficial in the long run but hurt in the short term. On the contrary you seem to win and remain popular by for example running massive deficits that fund ballooning public sector jobs.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Cultural changes but western democracies seem to be encouraging a culture that only values short term solutions that create long term problems.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I think it's because the individual voter quite reasonably only cares about how much is in their own wallet. Asking someone to face 10 years of hardship so that the economy of everyone can improve is just an impossible sell.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I think some people can deal with it but that percentage has rapidly shrunk with mass immigration from countries that only value short term solutions and things becoming more of a rat race
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Idk man this had been a steady trend since like the early 80s, I think this might be the one issue you can't blame immigrants for
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Its not blaming immigrants for its entirety rather its them adding to the issue.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Well you are claiming that immigrants are worse per capita which I disagree with
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
+ most people aren't policy wonks and wouldn't even know e.g. what monetary policy is good/bad in the long/short term
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Also when people that r*ped the economy leave office they are remembered very fondly like Thatcher, Reagan and even like Karamanlis in Greece. People used to joke that under the New Democracy party people didn't know what the โฌ5 note looked like.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Downmarseyd for Thatcher-phobia
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
HOW DID THATCHER AND REAGAN R*PE THE ECONOMY?
I LOVE SUCKING PEEPEE
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
With their peepeees
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
With their peepeees
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
SOMEHOW MILEI MANAGED TO CONVINCE MILLIONS OF ARGIES TO SUFFER SHORT TERM HARDSHIP FOR LONG TERM GAIN AND PULLED IT OFF
SO IT'S NOT IMPOSSIBLE
I LOVE SUCKING PEEPEE
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Its because they were already suffering
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Yeah I am really impressed he managed to win, but his approval rate is already dipping :(
But I'm also not excited for our economy to get to Argentina levels of fricked before we even try to right the ship
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
As opposite to which country?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It's why it's called the least bad option, sure you don't do a lot of things like long term planning well but at least you don't do far worse things like starting wars over your ego or killing all the sparrows
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
it's only the best option
for developed economies that don't need to change much and have an educated middle 
class. for developing economies developmental dictatorships are the best.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I guess the r-slurred russians voted themselves back into a dictatorship anyway so some truth there
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
russia
isn't a developmental dictatorship though. putin 
hasn't improved the economy at all except stabilized it with resource extraction.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
The least worse option is democracy with very limited power.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Even better, you can make things worse on purpose to encourage people who oppose you to move somewhere else. That's what the hibernians did to Boston
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The best way to restrict its r-slurred parts is to decrease government's power over the social and economic spheres of life. Of course, voters hate this, but they're r-slurred and should be ignored.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
My solution has been an open democracy, but requires a rigorous exam to actually vote.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
You options are a 5% shit sandwich up too a 100% shitsandwich. Democracy is the 5% shisandwich
Jewish lives matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context