https://old.reddit.com/r/neofeudalism/comments/1ho7izw/democracy_moment/

Most Based Comments

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔘🔘

"How do you know capitalism works better than communism.""Look at history!""Ok, should we also look at history to see if monarchy works better than democracy?""NOOO!!!! No more looking at history!!!" (14)

r/RoyalismSlander Royalism was very successful historically. (-1)

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔘🔘🔘

"How do you know capitalism works better than communism.""Look at history!""Ok, should we also look at history to see if monarchy works better than democracy?""NOOO!!!! No more looking at history!!!" (14)

The vast majority of human progress occurred under monarchs (-1)

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔘🔘🔘

Are you talking about World War I, literally the most shameful event in the history of monarchy as an institution and the catalyst that caused most politically powerful monarchies to start crumbling world wide? (13)

"What in tarnation, by not ceding ground to Adolf Hitler, you triggered him to start a destructive war! What a shameful display to democracy (Hitler was democratically elected)!" (-1)

Angriest Comments

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

"What in tarnation, by not ceding ground to Adolf Hitler, you triggered him to start a destructive war! What a shameful display to democracy (Hitler was democratically elected)!" (-1)

Are you seriously mixing up World War I and World War II?? Hitler was a direct consequence of World War I which was a direct consequence of poor leadership by monarchists. (10)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡🔘

WW2, war of 1812, craziness during classical antiquity, Roman Republic etc.. (1)

So cleaning up monarchy's mess, a war between a republic and a monarchy, and a nation that started more wars as an empire than as a republic? Sounds about right. Did you forget that Europe was at war continuously for 1,500 years under monarchy? (6)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡🔘

With the new territories in the East... they would've been able to continue fighting. (1)

Ok, and? The people were being starved, around 750,000 people. That's a lot of non-military casualties. They were being pushed back, their propaganda said they weren't, but they were, and by 1917 luddendorf was already preparing for defeat. That's why they were already weakening the monarchy before the war even ended, they hoped that the entente would prefer a democracy. Austria Hungary would've been battered by Italy regardless, American troops weren't really there, and if Austria fell, than Germany would be by itself. The ottomans were already collapsing, and Bulgaria couldn't sustain itself (2)

Derpballz

Score: 🐮🐮🐮🐮🔘

Number of comments: 23

Average angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

Maximum angriness: 😡😡😡😡🔘

Minimum angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining! :marseyminer:

autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramneurodivergents. Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

View entire discussion

Katedra polska/gora :marseyflagpoland:

1mo ago #7549676

Looking at world war 1 and reaching a conclusion like 'monarchies are necessarily evil' instead of 'balkanoids and Slavs are r-slurred' is hilarious

35 Context

TheUbieSeether cute/twink :marseyhissing:

Katedra 1mo ago #7551415

How did the flow of events go?

We had the UK and France in a mutual defense agreement. France and Russia had the same. Germoids weren't beholden to any major nation, or maybe somethibg with Austria. Serboid assassinates Duke Ferdinand of Austria. Austria does something.... Russia attacks Austria. France declares war against Russia. Germany, which could've remained neutral, decided to invade France.

!historychads, help a neighbor out.

12 Context

BushWasRight free/dom There's no ideology but liberal democracy :marseyliberty:

and Fukuyama :marseyreactor:

is its prophet TheUbieSeether 1mo ago #7552738

Looking at any 20th century event and not reaching the conclusion that Germs are evil is r-slurred.

5 Context

Allende trussy/rate TheUbieSeether 1mo ago #7551626

It's been a bit and the Alliance networks were a bit of a mess in regards to Britain particularly, but..

Russia viewed itself as protector of the Slavs

Austria-Hungary and Germany were allied

France and Russia were allied.

Britain had declared it would protect Belgium Neutrality.

Franz Ferdinand was just the match strike that set this all off and there were off ramps after it happened, but a variety of blunders prevented them from being taken.

Ferdinand was killed, Austria-Hungary received assurances from Germany that they had a "blank check", Russia wanted to appear as the strong slavic protector, and distract from some inner failings leading to the conflict really kicking off. From there the Alliance network of France and Russia triggered bringing France into the war, this lead to the Germans acting on their pre-war Schlieffen Plan leading them to attack France through Belgium. This violated the neutrality of Belgium giving the UK an excuse to enter the war on the side of the entente.

6 Context

Redactor0 naori/oppa Darklands shill, do not engage TheUbieSeether 1mo ago #7555736

The Germans had already decided earlier that 1914 was about the the last moment when they had any hope of beating Russia because of its rapid industrialization so they needed to blow up the next crisis into a world war. This is actually how krauts think. (Not hyperbole, this is all from kraut archives.)