Redactor0naori/oppa
Darklands shill, do not engage
syscoshill 16d ago#7676593
Edited 16d ago
spent 0 currency on pings
No there's still a list of stuff that has to be redacted:
25X1 - Sources and methods. This is by far the most common. This could be some high tech surveillance method that we don't want our enemies to find out about. But usually it's someone who spied for us or someone who just had a conversation with someone at the US Embassy and could get accused of spying for us. If it's a person then you've got to redact anything that can be used to personally identify them.
25X6 - Would damage diplomatic relations with foreign countries. I've seen this a few times. It means they have to reveal naughty things that the US government has done but not Britain, France, Israel, etc.
obvious stuff - How to build nukes, how to get past the Secret Service, how to break our codes, war plans, etc. Stuff that actual spies would be interested in. I hardly ever see these, probably because they wouldn't declassify the document to begin with if it was that important.
Jimmy Hoffa, perhaps the ur example of "corrupt union leader" in the modern era, famous missing person case (consensus is that the mob dissapeared him)
Because I'm reading this stuff right now. People wanted me to cover the various interrelated crises in the Middle East that happened in 1958 and it's really really complicated so I gotta do some research.
Unlike conspiracy tards I actually read declassified documents. One of the defining features of a conspiracy theorist is that they are extremely allergic to actually learning about the topic they supposedly care about. They just want to have an opinion because they saw something in a movie a long time ago.
In my day we watched the X-Files because it was fun but we knew it was fiction. These days the fate of the entire world is determined by r-slurs who can't tell the difference between a TV show and reality.
they have mandatory 25 and 50 year review intervals to declassify old documents, and they still redact certain information to make them unclassified
example, you can't include nuclear restricted data and weapons design, you can't reveal known weapon system vulnerabilities, you can't expose the methods used to gather intelligence, and you can't reveal the name of a spy or informant if they're alive a lot of the time
No sexualizing minors, even as a joke. This includes cartoons.
No doxxing.
Using alts to game dramacoin will get you banned.
If you post screenshots of publicly-available content, make sure to also include links.
Supporting free speech is an immediate ban.
Absolutely NO anti-CCP sentiment.
Absolutely NO homophobia, transphobia or furphobia.
Absolutely NO misgendering.
Absolutely NO antisemitism.
Absolutely NO vaccine misinformation.
You are encouraged to post drama you are involved in.
You are encouraged to brigade in bad faith.
You are encouraged to gaslight, to gatekeep, above all else, to girlboss.
You are encouraged to egg people on to transition or otherwise make drastic life changes.
This site is a janny playground, participation implies enthusiastic consent to being janny abused by unstable alcoholic bullies who have nothing better to do than banning you for any reason or no reason whatsoever (MODS = GODS)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
https://old.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1i8d2a6/trump_signs_order_to_release_jfkrfkmlk_files/
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Wouldn't that be if it was a FOIA request? Declassification means without redaction, no?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No there's still a list of stuff that has to be redacted:
25X1 - Sources and methods. This is by far the most common. This could be some high tech surveillance method that we don't want our enemies to find out about. But usually it's someone who spied for us or someone who just had a conversation with someone at the US Embassy and could get accused of spying for us. If it's a person then you've got to redact anything that can be used to personally identify them.
25X6 - Would damage diplomatic relations with foreign countries. I've seen this a few times. It means they have to reveal naughty things that the US government has done but not Britain, France, Israel, etc.
obvious stuff - How to build nukes, how to get past the Secret Service, how to break our codes, war plans, etc. Stuff that actual spies would be interested in. I hardly ever see these, probably because they wouldn't declassify the document to begin with if it was that important.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Redactor is:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jimmy Hoffa, perhaps the ur example of "corrupt union leader" in the modern era, famous missing person case (consensus is that the mob dissapeared him)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Finally live up to your name.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
This guy redacts
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Hey-Oh
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
How do you know this?![:marseysquint: :marseysquint:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseysquint.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Because I'm reading this stuff right now. People wanted me to cover the various interrelated crises in the Middle East that happened in 1958 and it's really really complicated so I gotta do some research.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
i dont know really, but I expected conspitards to be educated on this matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Unlike
@fine you somehow forgot who here is. ![:marseysmughipskorean: :marseysmughipskorean:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseysmughipskorean.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
tell us sensei whats the difference?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Unlike conspiracy tards I actually read declassified documents. One of the defining features of a conspiracy theorist is that they are extremely allergic to actually learning about the topic they supposedly care about. They just want to have an opinion because they saw something in a movie a long time ago.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's just fun grandpa
Modern world lacks mystery. So make some for yourself.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
In my day we watched the X-Files because it was fun but we knew it was fiction. These days the fate of the entire world is determined by r-slurs who can't tell the difference between a TV show and reality.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The modern world is
though, how don't you see any mystery anywhere? ![:marseyconfused2: :marseyconfused2:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseyconfused2.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
!sd r-slurred wise
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's more fun to read the wildest theories but not fact check anything to denies it
Carlos Marcello did JFK and I won't hear anything contrary
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
FOIA requests for anything interesting tend to be "lol frick off"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
they have mandatory 25 and 50 year review intervals to declassify old documents, and they still redact certain information to make them unclassified
example, you can't include nuclear restricted data and weapons design, you can't reveal known weapon system vulnerabilities, you can't expose the methods used to gather intelligence, and you can't reveal the name of a spy or informant if they're alive a lot of the time
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
JFK was BORN on MAY 29, 1917 then WAS BAPTIZED CATHOLIC which shows CATHOLICS DENY THAT THE SACRIFICE OF JESUS CHRIST CAN SAVE NEWBORN INNOCENT BABIES
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context